合法性是否影响食品安全管理中的协同监管?来自中国的证据

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI:10.1080/15309576.2023.2181196
Guochong Xu, Longxia Huo, Can Chen
{"title":"合法性是否影响食品安全管理中的协同监管?来自中国的证据","authors":"Guochong Xu, Longxia Huo, Can Chen","doi":"10.1080/15309576.2023.2181196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article discusses the influence of external and internal legitimacy on food safety collaborative regulation. Drawing upon the legitimacy theory, this research proposes key hypotheses: (1) external legitimacy shapes the overall features of collaborative regulation, and (2) internal legitimacy influences partner selection. This research empirically tests research hypotheses using social network analysis (bootstrap t-test and MR-QAP) and the food safety regulation documents jointly issued by the Chinese central government’s agencies during 2010–2017. It finds that external legitimacy influences the overall characteristics of collaborative networks (cohesion), and internal legitimacy influences the local characteristics of collaborative networks, that is, partner selection (pragmatic consideration and cognitive consideration). Although partner selection is driven by both pragmatic and cognitive considerations, the latter is much more important.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Legitimacy Affect the Collaborative Regulation in the Food Safety Administration? Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Guochong Xu, Longxia Huo, Can Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15309576.2023.2181196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article discusses the influence of external and internal legitimacy on food safety collaborative regulation. Drawing upon the legitimacy theory, this research proposes key hypotheses: (1) external legitimacy shapes the overall features of collaborative regulation, and (2) internal legitimacy influences partner selection. This research empirically tests research hypotheses using social network analysis (bootstrap t-test and MR-QAP) and the food safety regulation documents jointly issued by the Chinese central government’s agencies during 2010–2017. It finds that external legitimacy influences the overall characteristics of collaborative networks (cohesion), and internal legitimacy influences the local characteristics of collaborative networks, that is, partner selection (pragmatic consideration and cognitive consideration). Although partner selection is driven by both pragmatic and cognitive considerations, the latter is much more important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2181196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2181196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了外部合法性和内部合法性对食品安全协同监管的影响。借鉴合法性理论,本研究提出了关键假设:(1)外部合法性塑造了协同监管的整体特征;(2)内部合法性影响合作伙伴选择。本研究利用社会网络分析(bootstrap t检验和MR-QAP)和2010-2017年中国中央政府部门联合发布的食品安全监管文件对研究假设进行实证检验。研究发现,外部合法性影响协作网络的整体特征(凝聚力),内部合法性影响协作网络的局部特征,即伙伴选择(语用考虑和认知考虑)。尽管伴侣的选择受到实用主义和认知因素的双重影响,但后者更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Legitimacy Affect the Collaborative Regulation in the Food Safety Administration? Evidence from China
Abstract This article discusses the influence of external and internal legitimacy on food safety collaborative regulation. Drawing upon the legitimacy theory, this research proposes key hypotheses: (1) external legitimacy shapes the overall features of collaborative regulation, and (2) internal legitimacy influences partner selection. This research empirically tests research hypotheses using social network analysis (bootstrap t-test and MR-QAP) and the food safety regulation documents jointly issued by the Chinese central government’s agencies during 2010–2017. It finds that external legitimacy influences the overall characteristics of collaborative networks (cohesion), and internal legitimacy influences the local characteristics of collaborative networks, that is, partner selection (pragmatic consideration and cognitive consideration). Although partner selection is driven by both pragmatic and cognitive considerations, the latter is much more important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1