社区参与背后的动机:来自斯里兰卡自然和人工实地实验的证据

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Pacific Economic Review Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1111/1468-0106.12352
M. Shoji, Keitaro Aoyagi, Ryuji Kasahara, Y. Sawada
{"title":"社区参与背后的动机:来自斯里兰卡自然和人工实地实验的证据","authors":"M. Shoji, Keitaro Aoyagi, Ryuji Kasahara, Y. Sawada","doi":"10.1111/1468-0106.12352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We tested four alternative hypotheses concerning the motivations behind the participation by rural households in community work: public goods investment, production network formation, risk‐sharing network formation, and pure altruism. We used a unique dataset from an irrigation project in Sri Lanka under a natural experimental situation where a significant portion of irrigated land was allocated through a lottery mechanism. In addition, we elicited the level of altruism using the dictator game. By combining these data, we showed that community participation patterns fit the motive to form risk‐sharing networks better than the other major motives. Only a few studies have empirically investigated the process of risk‐sharing network formation, and our analysis fills the gap in the literature.","PeriodicalId":46516,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Economic Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"577-600"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1468-0106.12352","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motives behind community participation: Evidence from natural and artefactual field experiments in Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"M. Shoji, Keitaro Aoyagi, Ryuji Kasahara, Y. Sawada\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-0106.12352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We tested four alternative hypotheses concerning the motivations behind the participation by rural households in community work: public goods investment, production network formation, risk‐sharing network formation, and pure altruism. We used a unique dataset from an irrigation project in Sri Lanka under a natural experimental situation where a significant portion of irrigated land was allocated through a lottery mechanism. In addition, we elicited the level of altruism using the dictator game. By combining these data, we showed that community participation patterns fit the motive to form risk‐sharing networks better than the other major motives. Only a few studies have empirically investigated the process of risk‐sharing network formation, and our analysis fills the gap in the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacific Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"577-600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1468-0106.12352\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacific Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12352\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们测试了关于农村家庭参与社区工作背后动机的四种假设:公共物品投资、生产网络形成、风险分担网络形成和纯粹利他主义。我们使用了斯里兰卡一个灌溉项目的独特数据集,该项目在自然实验情况下,通过摇号机制分配了很大一部分灌溉土地。此外,我们用独裁者游戏引出了利他主义的水平。通过结合这些数据,我们发现社区参与模式比其他主要动机更适合形成风险分担网络的动机。只有少数研究对风险分担网络的形成过程进行了实证研究,我们的分析填补了文献的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Motives behind community participation: Evidence from natural and artefactual field experiments in Sri Lanka
We tested four alternative hypotheses concerning the motivations behind the participation by rural households in community work: public goods investment, production network formation, risk‐sharing network formation, and pure altruism. We used a unique dataset from an irrigation project in Sri Lanka under a natural experimental situation where a significant portion of irrigated land was allocated through a lottery mechanism. In addition, we elicited the level of altruism using the dictator game. By combining these data, we showed that community participation patterns fit the motive to form risk‐sharing networks better than the other major motives. Only a few studies have empirically investigated the process of risk‐sharing network formation, and our analysis fills the gap in the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Pacific Economic Review (PER) publishes high-quality articles in all areas of economics, both the theoretical and empirical, and welcomes in particular analyses of economic issues in the Asia-Pacific area. Published five times a year from 2007, the journal is of interest to academic, government and corporate economists. The Pacific Economic Review is the official publication of the Hong Kong Economic Association and has a strong editorial team and international board of editors. As a highly acclaimed journal, the Pacific Economic Review is a source of valuable information and insight. Contributors include Nobel Laureates and leading scholars from all over the world.
期刊最新文献
Consumption externalities, habit formation and optimal dynamic non‐linear income taxation under asymmetric information Can immigrant workers help to solve the child labour problem? Informed traders, beauty contest and stock price volatility: Evidence from laboratory markets Imperfect information and tourist's response to natural disasters Is Hong Kong still an entrepôt under the Sino‐U.S. trade war?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1