书评

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Social Service Review Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1086/717266
Danae Dotolo
{"title":"书评","authors":"Danae Dotolo","doi":"10.1086/717266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Moral Distress and Injury in Human Services: Cases, Causes, and Strategies for Prevention, Frederic Reamer provides a much-needed introduction to the concepts of moral distress and moral injury. As an eminent educator, researcher, and ethicist in the field of social work, Reamer draws on his extensive experience to ground concepts in practice-based examples and case studies,which are particularly valuable resources for educators in socialwork training and continuing education programs. The concept ofmoral distresswas developed in nursing and ethics scholarship in the 1980s. As recently as 2009, scholars observed that, even though nurses and social workers practice in similarly complex, hierarchical, and morally fraught contexts, the concept has been conspicuously absent from North American social work scholarship. (See Merlinda Weinberg, “Moral Distress: A Missing but Relevant Concept for Ethics in Social Work,” Canadian Social Work Review 26, no. 2 [2009]: 139–51.) Research and teaching on ethics in social work often focus on explications and applications of ethical principles in relation to major ethical dilemmas and overt transgressions by providers.This orientation sometimes fails to attend to the psychological toll of “everyday” ethical challenges in practice,which are complicated bymeso andmacro contexts, such as organizational practices or social policies.Moral Distress and Injury in Human Services provides a helpful foundation for a deeper dive into ethics in social work practice and integration of the concepts of moral distress and injury in the field. Reamer defines moral distress as “the psychological disequilibrium and negative feeling state experiencedwhen a personmakes amoral decision but does not follow through by performing the behavior indicated by that decision” (13). He defines moral injury as “harm that results when someone has","PeriodicalId":47665,"journal":{"name":"Social Service Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review\",\"authors\":\"Danae Dotolo\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/717266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Moral Distress and Injury in Human Services: Cases, Causes, and Strategies for Prevention, Frederic Reamer provides a much-needed introduction to the concepts of moral distress and moral injury. As an eminent educator, researcher, and ethicist in the field of social work, Reamer draws on his extensive experience to ground concepts in practice-based examples and case studies,which are particularly valuable resources for educators in socialwork training and continuing education programs. The concept ofmoral distresswas developed in nursing and ethics scholarship in the 1980s. As recently as 2009, scholars observed that, even though nurses and social workers practice in similarly complex, hierarchical, and morally fraught contexts, the concept has been conspicuously absent from North American social work scholarship. (See Merlinda Weinberg, “Moral Distress: A Missing but Relevant Concept for Ethics in Social Work,” Canadian Social Work Review 26, no. 2 [2009]: 139–51.) Research and teaching on ethics in social work often focus on explications and applications of ethical principles in relation to major ethical dilemmas and overt transgressions by providers.This orientation sometimes fails to attend to the psychological toll of “everyday” ethical challenges in practice,which are complicated bymeso andmacro contexts, such as organizational practices or social policies.Moral Distress and Injury in Human Services provides a helpful foundation for a deeper dive into ethics in social work practice and integration of the concepts of moral distress and injury in the field. Reamer defines moral distress as “the psychological disequilibrium and negative feeling state experiencedwhen a personmakes amoral decision but does not follow through by performing the behavior indicated by that decision” (13). He defines moral injury as “harm that results when someone has\",\"PeriodicalId\":47665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Service Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Service Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/717266\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Service Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《人类服务中的道德痛苦和伤害:案例、原因和预防策略》一书中,弗雷德里克·雷默对道德痛苦和道德伤害的概念进行了必要的介绍。作为社会工作领域的杰出教育家、研究者和伦理学家,雷默利用他丰富的经验,在基于实践的例子和案例研究中建立概念,这对社会工作培训和继续教育项目的教育者来说是特别宝贵的资源。道德困境的概念是在20世纪80年代在护理和伦理学术中发展起来的。就在最近的2009年,学者们观察到,尽管护士和社会工作者在同样复杂、等级森严、充满道德的环境中工作,但这个概念在北美社会工作学术中明显缺失。(参见梅琳达·温伯格:《道德困境:社会工作中缺失但相关的伦理概念》,《加拿大社会工作评论》第26期。[2009]: 139-51。关于社会工作伦理的研究和教学往往侧重于解释和应用与主要道德困境和提供者明显违法行为有关的道德原则。这种取向有时无法关注实践中“日常”道德挑战的心理代价,这些挑战因中观和宏观背景(如组织实践或社会政策)而变得复杂。《人类服务中的道德困境和伤害》为深入研究社会工作实践中的道德问题以及该领域中道德困境和伤害概念的整合提供了有益的基础。Reamer将道德困境定义为“当一个人做出了不道德的决定,但却没有按照决定所指示的行为去做时所经历的心理失衡和消极情绪状态”(13)。他将道德伤害定义为“当某人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review
In Moral Distress and Injury in Human Services: Cases, Causes, and Strategies for Prevention, Frederic Reamer provides a much-needed introduction to the concepts of moral distress and moral injury. As an eminent educator, researcher, and ethicist in the field of social work, Reamer draws on his extensive experience to ground concepts in practice-based examples and case studies,which are particularly valuable resources for educators in socialwork training and continuing education programs. The concept ofmoral distresswas developed in nursing and ethics scholarship in the 1980s. As recently as 2009, scholars observed that, even though nurses and social workers practice in similarly complex, hierarchical, and morally fraught contexts, the concept has been conspicuously absent from North American social work scholarship. (See Merlinda Weinberg, “Moral Distress: A Missing but Relevant Concept for Ethics in Social Work,” Canadian Social Work Review 26, no. 2 [2009]: 139–51.) Research and teaching on ethics in social work often focus on explications and applications of ethical principles in relation to major ethical dilemmas and overt transgressions by providers.This orientation sometimes fails to attend to the psychological toll of “everyday” ethical challenges in practice,which are complicated bymeso andmacro contexts, such as organizational practices or social policies.Moral Distress and Injury in Human Services provides a helpful foundation for a deeper dive into ethics in social work practice and integration of the concepts of moral distress and injury in the field. Reamer defines moral distress as “the psychological disequilibrium and negative feeling state experiencedwhen a personmakes amoral decision but does not follow through by performing the behavior indicated by that decision” (13). He defines moral injury as “harm that results when someone has
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Service Review
Social Service Review SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Founded in 1927, Social Service Review is devoted to the publication of thought-provoking, original research on social welfare policy, organization, and practice. Articles in the Review analyze issues from the points of view of various disciplines, theories, and methodological traditions, view critical problems in context, and carefully consider long-range solutions. The Review features balanced, scholarly contributions from social work and social welfare scholars, as well as from members of the various allied disciplines engaged in research on human behavior, social systems, history, public policy, and social services.
期刊最新文献
Social Transfer Programs as Non-Spatially-Targeted Methods of Reducing Interregional Geographic Inequality The Effects of Waiving WIC Physical Presence Requirements on Program Caseloads Unconditional Cash and Breastfeeding, Child Care, and Maternal Employment among Families with Young Children Residing in Poverty The Effects of the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC) on Child-Care Use and Maternal Labor Supply Increasing Home Visiting Enrollment through Enhanced Outreach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1