使用最先进的自然语言处理技术评估接受性词汇

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Second Language Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-20 DOI:10.1075/jsls.22006.cro
S. Crossley, Langdon Holmes
{"title":"使用最先进的自然语言处理技术评估接受性词汇","authors":"S. Crossley, Langdon Holmes","doi":"10.1075/jsls.22006.cro","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Semantic embedding approaches commonly used in natural language processing such as transformer models have rarely\n been used to examine L2 lexical knowledge. Importantly, their performance has not been contrasted with more traditional annotation\n approaches to lexical knowledge. This study used NLP techniques related to lexical annotations and semantic embedding approaches\n to model the receptive vocabulary of L2 learners based on their lexical production during a writing task. The goal of the study is\n to examine the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches in understanding L2 lexical knowledge. Findings indicate that\n transformer approaches based on semantic embeddings outperform linguistic annotations and Word2vec models in predicting L2\n learners’ vocabulary scores. The findings help to support the strength and accuracy of semantic-embedding approaches as well as\n their generalizability across tasks when compared to linguistic feature models. Limitations to semantic-embedding approaches,\n especially interpretability, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":29903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing receptive vocabulary using state‑of‑the‑art natural language processing techniques\",\"authors\":\"S. Crossley, Langdon Holmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jsls.22006.cro\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Semantic embedding approaches commonly used in natural language processing such as transformer models have rarely\\n been used to examine L2 lexical knowledge. Importantly, their performance has not been contrasted with more traditional annotation\\n approaches to lexical knowledge. This study used NLP techniques related to lexical annotations and semantic embedding approaches\\n to model the receptive vocabulary of L2 learners based on their lexical production during a writing task. The goal of the study is\\n to examine the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches in understanding L2 lexical knowledge. Findings indicate that\\n transformer approaches based on semantic embeddings outperform linguistic annotations and Word2vec models in predicting L2\\n learners’ vocabulary scores. The findings help to support the strength and accuracy of semantic-embedding approaches as well as\\n their generalizability across tasks when compared to linguistic feature models. Limitations to semantic-embedding approaches,\\n especially interpretability, are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.22006.cro\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.22006.cro","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

语义嵌入方法通常用于自然语言处理,如变压器模型,很少用于检查二语词汇知识。重要的是,它们的表现没有与更传统的词汇知识注释方法进行对比。本研究使用与词汇注释和语义嵌入相关的自然语言处理技术,基于二语学习者在写作任务中的词汇生成,对其接受性词汇进行建模。本研究的目的是考察这两种方法在理解二语词汇知识方面的优缺点。研究结果表明,基于语义嵌入的转换方法在预测二语学习者词汇成绩方面优于语言注释和Word2vec模型。与语言特征模型相比,这些发现有助于支持语义嵌入方法的强度和准确性,以及它们在任务间的泛化性。讨论了语义嵌入方法的局限性,特别是可解释性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing receptive vocabulary using state‑of‑the‑art natural language processing techniques
Semantic embedding approaches commonly used in natural language processing such as transformer models have rarely been used to examine L2 lexical knowledge. Importantly, their performance has not been contrasted with more traditional annotation approaches to lexical knowledge. This study used NLP techniques related to lexical annotations and semantic embedding approaches to model the receptive vocabulary of L2 learners based on their lexical production during a writing task. The goal of the study is to examine the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches in understanding L2 lexical knowledge. Findings indicate that transformer approaches based on semantic embeddings outperform linguistic annotations and Word2vec models in predicting L2 learners’ vocabulary scores. The findings help to support the strength and accuracy of semantic-embedding approaches as well as their generalizability across tasks when compared to linguistic feature models. Limitations to semantic-embedding approaches, especially interpretability, are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
The effects of frequency, duration, and intensity on L2 learning through Duolingo The detriment that error production creates is affected by non-L1 speakers’ linguistic group membership The neural correlates of second language syntax The relationships between individual differences in working memory and language analytical ability and the effectiveness of different types of corrective feedback How can we communicate (visually) what we (usually) mean by collocation and keyness?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1