D. K. Srivastava, M. Bharadwaj, T. Kapur, R. Trehan
{"title":"估计印度选定邦的相对税收效率:一种误差修正方法","authors":"D. K. Srivastava, M. Bharadwaj, T. Kapur, R. Trehan","doi":"10.1177/09763996231157048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We estimate state-level tax efficiency in India using an error correction framework, making a distinction between a long-term cointegrating relationship and a short-term dynamics around it. We use a stochastic frontier approach in a panel data framework considering 17 medium and large (ML) states for the period 2004–2005 to 2019–2020. We find that the FC14’s initiative to sharply increase the states’ share in the divisible pool of central taxes had an adverse impact on states’ own tax revenues. The short-term relationship converges to the long-term relationship in 2.6 years. In terms of relative tax effort, the most efficient state was Tamil Nadu, while the least efficient was Bihar. Results from this study would be useful in averting the problem of adverse incentives, while determining the intergovernmental transfers. In the post-GST scenario, operating at their tax efficiency frontier would be critical for states especially in the light of discontinuation of the GST compensation cess.","PeriodicalId":41791,"journal":{"name":"Millennial Asia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Relative Tax Efficiency for Selected States in India: An Error Correction Approach\",\"authors\":\"D. K. Srivastava, M. Bharadwaj, T. Kapur, R. Trehan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09763996231157048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We estimate state-level tax efficiency in India using an error correction framework, making a distinction between a long-term cointegrating relationship and a short-term dynamics around it. We use a stochastic frontier approach in a panel data framework considering 17 medium and large (ML) states for the period 2004–2005 to 2019–2020. We find that the FC14’s initiative to sharply increase the states’ share in the divisible pool of central taxes had an adverse impact on states’ own tax revenues. The short-term relationship converges to the long-term relationship in 2.6 years. In terms of relative tax effort, the most efficient state was Tamil Nadu, while the least efficient was Bihar. Results from this study would be useful in averting the problem of adverse incentives, while determining the intergovernmental transfers. In the post-GST scenario, operating at their tax efficiency frontier would be critical for states especially in the light of discontinuation of the GST compensation cess.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Millennial Asia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Millennial Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996231157048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennial Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996231157048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimating Relative Tax Efficiency for Selected States in India: An Error Correction Approach
We estimate state-level tax efficiency in India using an error correction framework, making a distinction between a long-term cointegrating relationship and a short-term dynamics around it. We use a stochastic frontier approach in a panel data framework considering 17 medium and large (ML) states for the period 2004–2005 to 2019–2020. We find that the FC14’s initiative to sharply increase the states’ share in the divisible pool of central taxes had an adverse impact on states’ own tax revenues. The short-term relationship converges to the long-term relationship in 2.6 years. In terms of relative tax effort, the most efficient state was Tamil Nadu, while the least efficient was Bihar. Results from this study would be useful in averting the problem of adverse incentives, while determining the intergovernmental transfers. In the post-GST scenario, operating at their tax efficiency frontier would be critical for states especially in the light of discontinuation of the GST compensation cess.
期刊介绍:
Millennial Asia: An International Journal of Asian Studies is a multidisciplinary, refereed biannual journal of the Association of Asia Scholars (AAS)–an association of the alumni of the Asian Scholarship Foundation (ASF). It aims to encourage multifaceted, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research on Asia, in order to understand its fast changing context as a growth pole of global economy. By providing a forum for Asian scholars situated globally, it promotes dialogue between the global academic community, civil society and policy makers on Asian issues. The journal examines Asia on a regional and comparative basis, emphasizing patterns and tendencies that go beyond national borders and are globally relevant. Modern and contemporary Asia has witnessed dynamic transformations in cultures, societies, economies and political institutions, among others. It confronts issues of collective identity formation, ecological crisis, rapid economic change and resurgence of religion and communal identifies while embracing globalization. An analysis of past experiences can help produce a deeper understanding of contemporary change. In particular, the journal is interested in locating contemporary changes within a historical perspective, through the use of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches. This way, it hopes to promote comparative studies involving Asia’s various regions. The journal brings out both thematic and general issues and the thrust areas are: Asian integration, Asian economies, sociology, culture, politics, governance, security, development issues, arts and literature and any other such issue as the editorial board may deem fit. The core fields include development encompassing agriculture, industry, regional trade, social sectors like health and education and development policy across the region and in specific countries in a comparative perspective.