Edwin Lenin Chica Arrieta, J. Betancour, L. Velásquez, A. Rubio Clemente
{"title":"基于六自由度UDF和滑动网格法的水轮机性能仿真","authors":"Edwin Lenin Chica Arrieta, J. Betancour, L. Velásquez, A. Rubio Clemente","doi":"10.22201/icat.24486736e.2023.21.2.1568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, a comparison between the six degrees of freedom (6-DoF) method and the sliding mesh approach in computational fluid dynamics simulations of an Archimedes screw turbine for hydrokinetic applications was performed using ANSYs Fluent software. The numerical curves obtained by representing the power coefficient () values versus the tip speed ratio ( or ) were compared based on the experimental data available in the literature. Therefore, by considering the values as the comparison benchmark parameter between the numerical and experimental data, the error obtained when using the 6-DoF method and the sliding mesh approach was 13% and 40%, respectively. Both methods allowed the simulation of the rotor rotation, although the 6-DoF method was more accurate in the prediction of the turbine performance, higher computational resources were consumed in comparison with the sliding mesh method, which allows to obtain a computational solution in affordable times.","PeriodicalId":15073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance simulation of water turbines by using 6-DoF UDF and sliding mesh methods\",\"authors\":\"Edwin Lenin Chica Arrieta, J. Betancour, L. Velásquez, A. Rubio Clemente\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/icat.24486736e.2023.21.2.1568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, a comparison between the six degrees of freedom (6-DoF) method and the sliding mesh approach in computational fluid dynamics simulations of an Archimedes screw turbine for hydrokinetic applications was performed using ANSYs Fluent software. The numerical curves obtained by representing the power coefficient () values versus the tip speed ratio ( or ) were compared based on the experimental data available in the literature. Therefore, by considering the values as the comparison benchmark parameter between the numerical and experimental data, the error obtained when using the 6-DoF method and the sliding mesh approach was 13% and 40%, respectively. Both methods allowed the simulation of the rotor rotation, although the 6-DoF method was more accurate in the prediction of the turbine performance, higher computational resources were consumed in comparison with the sliding mesh method, which allows to obtain a computational solution in affordable times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/icat.24486736e.2023.21.2.1568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/icat.24486736e.2023.21.2.1568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance simulation of water turbines by using 6-DoF UDF and sliding mesh methods
In this work, a comparison between the six degrees of freedom (6-DoF) method and the sliding mesh approach in computational fluid dynamics simulations of an Archimedes screw turbine for hydrokinetic applications was performed using ANSYs Fluent software. The numerical curves obtained by representing the power coefficient () values versus the tip speed ratio ( or ) were compared based on the experimental data available in the literature. Therefore, by considering the values as the comparison benchmark parameter between the numerical and experimental data, the error obtained when using the 6-DoF method and the sliding mesh approach was 13% and 40%, respectively. Both methods allowed the simulation of the rotor rotation, although the 6-DoF method was more accurate in the prediction of the turbine performance, higher computational resources were consumed in comparison with the sliding mesh method, which allows to obtain a computational solution in affordable times.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Research and Technology (JART) is a bimonthly open access journal that publishes papers on innovative applications, development of new technologies and efficient solutions in engineering, computing and scientific research. JART publishes manuscripts describing original research, with significant results based on experimental, theoretical and numerical work.
The journal does not charge for submission, processing, publication of manuscripts or for color reproduction of photographs.
JART classifies research into the following main fields:
-Material Science:
Biomaterials, carbon, ceramics, composite, metals, polymers, thin films, functional materials and semiconductors.
-Computer Science:
Computer graphics and visualization, programming, human-computer interaction, neural networks, image processing and software engineering.
-Industrial Engineering:
Operations research, systems engineering, management science, complex systems and cybernetics applications and information technologies
-Electronic Engineering:
Solid-state physics, radio engineering, telecommunications, control systems, signal processing, power electronics, electronic devices and circuits and automation.
-Instrumentation engineering and science:
Measurement devices (pressure, temperature, flow, voltage, frequency etc.), precision engineering, medical devices, instrumentation for education (devices and software), sensor technology, mechatronics and robotics.