中国农产品期货市场流动性:计量与跨市场依赖

IF 4.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY China Agricultural Economic Review Pub Date : 2022-01-14 DOI:10.1108/caer-05-2021-0099
Yuanyuan Xu, Jian Li, Linjie Wang, Chongguang Li
{"title":"中国农产品期货市场流动性:计量与跨市场依赖","authors":"Yuanyuan Xu, Jian Li, Linjie Wang, Chongguang Li","doi":"10.1108/caer-05-2021-0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to present the first empirical liquidity measurement of China’s agricultural futures markets and study time-varying liquidity dependence across markets.Design/methodology/approachBased on both high- and low-frequency trading data of soybean and corn, this paper evaluates short-term liquidity adjustment in Chinese agricultural futures market measured by liquidity benchmark and long-term liquidity development measured by liquidity proxies.FindingsBy constructing comparisons, the authors identify the seminal paper of Fong, Holden and Trzcinka (2017) as the best low-frequency liquidity proxy in China’s agricultural futures market and capture similar historical patterns of the liquidity in soybean and corn markets. The authors further employ Copula-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models to investigate liquidity dependence between soybean and corn futures markets. Results show that cross-market liquidity dependence tends to be dynamic and asymmetric (in upper versus lower tails). The liquidity dependence becomes stronger when these markets experience negative shocks than positive shocks, indicating a concern on the contagion effect of liquidity risk under negative financial situations.Originality/valueThe findings of this study provide useful information on the dynamic evolution of liquidity pattern and cross-market dependence of fastest-growing agricultural futures in the largest emerging economy.","PeriodicalId":10095,"journal":{"name":"China Agricultural Economic Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquidity of China’s agricultural futures market: measurement and cross-market dependence\",\"authors\":\"Yuanyuan Xu, Jian Li, Linjie Wang, Chongguang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/caer-05-2021-0099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper aims to present the first empirical liquidity measurement of China’s agricultural futures markets and study time-varying liquidity dependence across markets.Design/methodology/approachBased on both high- and low-frequency trading data of soybean and corn, this paper evaluates short-term liquidity adjustment in Chinese agricultural futures market measured by liquidity benchmark and long-term liquidity development measured by liquidity proxies.FindingsBy constructing comparisons, the authors identify the seminal paper of Fong, Holden and Trzcinka (2017) as the best low-frequency liquidity proxy in China’s agricultural futures market and capture similar historical patterns of the liquidity in soybean and corn markets. The authors further employ Copula-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models to investigate liquidity dependence between soybean and corn futures markets. Results show that cross-market liquidity dependence tends to be dynamic and asymmetric (in upper versus lower tails). The liquidity dependence becomes stronger when these markets experience negative shocks than positive shocks, indicating a concern on the contagion effect of liquidity risk under negative financial situations.Originality/valueThe findings of this study provide useful information on the dynamic evolution of liquidity pattern and cross-market dependence of fastest-growing agricultural futures in the largest emerging economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Agricultural Economic Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Agricultural Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-05-2021-0099\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Agricultural Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-05-2021-0099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的本文首次对中国农产品期货市场的流动性进行实证测量,并研究跨市场流动性的时变依赖性。设计/方法论/方法基于大豆和玉米的高频和低频交易数据,评估了以流动性基准衡量的中国农业期货市场短期流动性调整和以流动性代理衡量的长期流动性发展。通过构建比较,作者将Fong、Holden和Trzcinka(2017)的开创性论文确定为中国农业期货市场的最佳低频流动性代理,并捕捉到大豆和玉米市场流动性的相似历史模式。作者进一步使用Copula广义自回归条件异方差模型来研究大豆和玉米期货市场之间的流动性依赖性。结果表明,跨市场流动性依赖往往是动态的和不对称的(上尾部与下尾部)。当这些市场经历负面冲击时,流动性依赖性比正面冲击更强,这表明人们担心在负面金融情况下流动性风险的传染效应。原创性/价值本研究的发现为最大的新兴经济体中增长最快的农业期货的流动性模式和跨市场依赖性的动态演变提供了有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Liquidity of China’s agricultural futures market: measurement and cross-market dependence
PurposeThis paper aims to present the first empirical liquidity measurement of China’s agricultural futures markets and study time-varying liquidity dependence across markets.Design/methodology/approachBased on both high- and low-frequency trading data of soybean and corn, this paper evaluates short-term liquidity adjustment in Chinese agricultural futures market measured by liquidity benchmark and long-term liquidity development measured by liquidity proxies.FindingsBy constructing comparisons, the authors identify the seminal paper of Fong, Holden and Trzcinka (2017) as the best low-frequency liquidity proxy in China’s agricultural futures market and capture similar historical patterns of the liquidity in soybean and corn markets. The authors further employ Copula-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models to investigate liquidity dependence between soybean and corn futures markets. Results show that cross-market liquidity dependence tends to be dynamic and asymmetric (in upper versus lower tails). The liquidity dependence becomes stronger when these markets experience negative shocks than positive shocks, indicating a concern on the contagion effect of liquidity risk under negative financial situations.Originality/valueThe findings of this study provide useful information on the dynamic evolution of liquidity pattern and cross-market dependence of fastest-growing agricultural futures in the largest emerging economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
China Agricultural Economic Review
China Agricultural Economic Review AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published in association with China Agricultural University and the Chinese Association for Agricultural Economics, China Agricultural Economic Review publishes academic writings by international scholars, and particularly encourages empirical work that can be replicated and extended by others; and research articles that employ econometric and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models. The journal aims to publish research which can be applied to China’s agricultural and rural policy-making process, the development of the agricultural economics discipline and to developing countries hoping to learn from China’s agricultural and rural development.
期刊最新文献
Impact of agricultural land ownership on child nutrition in rural Sudan: an investigation across gender Typologies of South African small-scale farmers and their risk perceptions: an unsupervised machine learning approach Trade and energy efficiency: theory and evidence How do digital media strengthen the role of social networks in promoting farmers' adoption of climate change mitigation measures? Saving farm subsidies with smart climate interventions: the case of transition to a millet-based agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1