对蜜蜂的态度和对传粉者友好的做法:对爱荷华州养蜂人、农民和土地所有者的调查

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Integrated Pest Management Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jipm/pmac027
Randall P Cass, E. Hodgson, M. O'Neal, A. Toth, A. Dolezal
{"title":"对蜜蜂的态度和对传粉者友好的做法:对爱荷华州养蜂人、农民和土地所有者的调查","authors":"Randall P Cass, E. Hodgson, M. O'Neal, A. Toth, A. Dolezal","doi":"10.1093/jipm/pmac027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The north central state of Iowa is heavily dominated by agriculture, with limited nesting and foraging habitat for wild and managed pollinators. This region has been identified as critical for pollinator conservation for bees and non-bee species (e.g., monarch butterfly [Danaus plexippus]). Pollinator sustainability (i.e., wild bee conservation and sustainable beekeeping) relies upon management decisions by beekeepers, farmers, and landowners, but it is unclear if these stakeholders are aware of and use best practices. We present results of surveys administered to Iowan beekeepers, farmers, and landowners after extension programming on best management practices for sustaining honey bees (Apis mellifera) and other pollinators. Results show beekeepers, farmers, and landowners believe implementing pollinator-friendly practices is important. However, knowledge of tools to implement these practices, such as registering apiaries to avoid pesticide drift or cost-share programs for establishing habitat on their land, was very low. These results suggest opportunities exist for connecting beekeepers seeking higher quality apiaries with landowners that have established habitat with added floral resources. Further, we reviewed practices that reconstruct tallgrass prairie with support of federal cost-share funds, specifically CP42 and CP43 of the USDA’s conservation reserve program. Overall, we document strong support and enthusiasm for pollinator-friendly practices in Iowa but note gaps in knowledge of practices that are most effective and what tools are available to implement them. These results suggest a way for pollinator extension programs to address these knowledge gaps in a receptive group of beekeepers, farmers, and landowners.","PeriodicalId":16119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Pest Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes About Honey Bees and Pollinator-Friendly Practices: A Survey of Iowan Beekeepers, Farmers, and Landowners\",\"authors\":\"Randall P Cass, E. Hodgson, M. O'Neal, A. Toth, A. Dolezal\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jipm/pmac027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The north central state of Iowa is heavily dominated by agriculture, with limited nesting and foraging habitat for wild and managed pollinators. This region has been identified as critical for pollinator conservation for bees and non-bee species (e.g., monarch butterfly [Danaus plexippus]). Pollinator sustainability (i.e., wild bee conservation and sustainable beekeeping) relies upon management decisions by beekeepers, farmers, and landowners, but it is unclear if these stakeholders are aware of and use best practices. We present results of surveys administered to Iowan beekeepers, farmers, and landowners after extension programming on best management practices for sustaining honey bees (Apis mellifera) and other pollinators. Results show beekeepers, farmers, and landowners believe implementing pollinator-friendly practices is important. However, knowledge of tools to implement these practices, such as registering apiaries to avoid pesticide drift or cost-share programs for establishing habitat on their land, was very low. These results suggest opportunities exist for connecting beekeepers seeking higher quality apiaries with landowners that have established habitat with added floral resources. Further, we reviewed practices that reconstruct tallgrass prairie with support of federal cost-share funds, specifically CP42 and CP43 of the USDA’s conservation reserve program. Overall, we document strong support and enthusiasm for pollinator-friendly practices in Iowa but note gaps in knowledge of practices that are most effective and what tools are available to implement them. These results suggest a way for pollinator extension programs to address these knowledge gaps in a receptive group of beekeepers, farmers, and landowners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrated Pest Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrated Pest Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmac027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Pest Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmac027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

爱荷华州中北部以农业为主,野生和管理传粉昆虫的筑巢和觅食栖息地有限。该地区已被确定为蜜蜂和非蜜蜂物种(如帝王蝶[Danaus plexippus])传粉昆虫保护的关键地区。传粉者的可持续性(即野生蜜蜂保护和可持续养蜂)取决于养蜂人、农民和土地所有者的管理决策,但尚不清楚这些利益相关者是否意识到并使用最佳实践。我们介绍了在对维持蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)和其他传粉昆虫的最佳管理实践进行扩展编程后,对爱荷华州养蜂人、农民和土地所有者进行的调查结果。研究结果表明,养蜂人、农民和土地所有者认为实施对传粉昆虫友好的做法很重要。然而,对实施这些做法的工具的了解非常少,例如登记养蜂场以避免农药漂移或在其土地上建立栖息地的成本分担计划。这些结果表明,有机会将寻求更高质量养蜂场的养蜂人与拥有更多花卉资源的土地所有者联系起来。此外,我们还回顾了在联邦成本分担基金的支持下重建牛脂草草原的做法,特别是美国农业部保护区计划的CP42和CP43。总的来说,我们记录了爱荷华州对传粉昆虫友好做法的大力支持和热情,但注意到在最有效的做法以及实施这些做法的工具方面存在知识差距。这些结果为传粉昆虫推广计划提供了一种方法,以解决养蜂人、农民和土地所有者等乐于接受的群体中的这些知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitudes About Honey Bees and Pollinator-Friendly Practices: A Survey of Iowan Beekeepers, Farmers, and Landowners
The north central state of Iowa is heavily dominated by agriculture, with limited nesting and foraging habitat for wild and managed pollinators. This region has been identified as critical for pollinator conservation for bees and non-bee species (e.g., monarch butterfly [Danaus plexippus]). Pollinator sustainability (i.e., wild bee conservation and sustainable beekeeping) relies upon management decisions by beekeepers, farmers, and landowners, but it is unclear if these stakeholders are aware of and use best practices. We present results of surveys administered to Iowan beekeepers, farmers, and landowners after extension programming on best management practices for sustaining honey bees (Apis mellifera) and other pollinators. Results show beekeepers, farmers, and landowners believe implementing pollinator-friendly practices is important. However, knowledge of tools to implement these practices, such as registering apiaries to avoid pesticide drift or cost-share programs for establishing habitat on their land, was very low. These results suggest opportunities exist for connecting beekeepers seeking higher quality apiaries with landowners that have established habitat with added floral resources. Further, we reviewed practices that reconstruct tallgrass prairie with support of federal cost-share funds, specifically CP42 and CP43 of the USDA’s conservation reserve program. Overall, we document strong support and enthusiasm for pollinator-friendly practices in Iowa but note gaps in knowledge of practices that are most effective and what tools are available to implement them. These results suggest a way for pollinator extension programs to address these knowledge gaps in a receptive group of beekeepers, farmers, and landowners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Pest Management
Journal of Integrated Pest Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
24
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Integrated Pest Management is an open access, peer-reviewed, extension journal covering the field of integrated pest management. The Editors-in-Chief are Dr. Marlin E. Rice (formerly with Iowa State University) and Dr. Kevin L. Steffey (formerly with the University of Illinois). The journal is multi-disciplinary in scope, publishing articles in all pest management disciplines, including entomology, nematology, plant pathology, weed science, and other subject areas.
期刊最新文献
Grower perceptions and adoption of IPM and non-Bt refuge in field corn: a survey in North and South Carolina Agricultural issues with climate change—case studies with 3 soybean pests: Johnsongrass, kudzu bug, and charcoal rot Gendered barriers and opportunities for scaling integrated pest management practices along the mango value chain in Kenya Forecasting the population development of within-season insect crop pests in sub-Saharan Africa: the Pest Risk Information Service Assessment of insecticide risk quantification methods: Introducing the Pesticide Risk Tool and its improvements over the Environmental Impact Quotient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1