laissez aller与竞争尊重:对尼采哲学竞争挪用的思考

IF 4.1 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Society Pub Date : 2021-01-29 DOI:10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E71200
Jean Gabriel Castro da Costa
{"title":"laissez aller与竞争尊重:对尼采哲学竞争挪用的思考","authors":"Jean Gabriel Castro da Costa","doi":"10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E71200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we analyze the use that agonistic theorists of democracy have made of Nietzsche’s philosophy with a focus on one of their main normative propositions: the idea of “agonisticrespect”. In the first section we present general characteristics of the appropriation of Nietzsche’s philosophy by the agonistic theorists of democracy. In the second section we present what William Connolly and Lawrence Hatab mean by “agonistic respect” and “democratic respect”.In the third section we criticize these appropriations of Nietzsche’s philosophy using Nietzsche’s own texts, pointing out some limits of the notion of agonistic respect and claiming that these theorists use Nietzsche to promote a laisser aller ethics that was severely criticized by him.","PeriodicalId":47847,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laisser aller e respeito agonístico: considerações sobre as apropriações agonísticas da filosofia de Nietzsche\",\"authors\":\"Jean Gabriel Castro da Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E71200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article we analyze the use that agonistic theorists of democracy have made of Nietzsche’s philosophy with a focus on one of their main normative propositions: the idea of “agonisticrespect”. In the first section we present general characteristics of the appropriation of Nietzsche’s philosophy by the agonistic theorists of democracy. In the second section we present what William Connolly and Lawrence Hatab mean by “agonistic respect” and “democratic respect”.In the third section we criticize these appropriations of Nietzsche’s philosophy using Nietzsche’s own texts, pointing out some limits of the notion of agonistic respect and claiming that these theorists use Nietzsche to promote a laisser aller ethics that was severely criticized by him.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics & Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E71200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E71200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们分析了痛苦的民主理论家对尼采哲学的使用,重点是他们的一个主要规范命题:“痛苦的尊重”思想。在第一节中,我们介绍了痛苦的民主理论家挪用尼采哲学的一般特征。在第二节中,我们介绍了威廉·康诺利和劳伦斯·哈塔布所说的“痛苦的尊重”和“民主的尊重”,指出了痛苦尊重概念的一些局限性,并声称这些理论家利用尼采来提倡一种被他严厉批评的自由主义伦理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Laisser aller e respeito agonístico: considerações sobre as apropriações agonísticas da filosofia de Nietzsche
In this article we analyze the use that agonistic theorists of democracy have made of Nietzsche’s philosophy with a focus on one of their main normative propositions: the idea of “agonisticrespect”. In the first section we present general characteristics of the appropriation of Nietzsche’s philosophy by the agonistic theorists of democracy. In the second section we present what William Connolly and Lawrence Hatab mean by “agonistic respect” and “democratic respect”.In the third section we criticize these appropriations of Nietzsche’s philosophy using Nietzsche’s own texts, pointing out some limits of the notion of agonistic respect and claiming that these theorists use Nietzsche to promote a laisser aller ethics that was severely criticized by him.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Society
Politics & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Politics & Society is a peer-reviewed journal. All submitted papers are read by a rotating editorial board member. If a paper is deemed potentially publishable, it is sent to another board member, who, if agreeing that it is potentially publishable, sends it to a third board member. If and only if all three agree, the paper is sent to the entire editorial board for consideration at board meetings. The editorial board meets three times a year, and the board members who are present (usually between 9 and 14) make decisions through a deliberative process that also considers written reports from absent members. Unlike many journals which rely on 1–3 individual blind referee reports and a single editor with final say, the peers who decide whether to accept submitted work are thus the full editorial board of the journal, comprised of scholars from various disciplines, who discuss papers openly, with author names known, at meetings. Editors are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest when evaluating manuscripts and to recuse themselves from voting if such a potential exists.
期刊最新文献
Bringing Household Finance Back In: House Prices and the Missing Macroeconomics of Comparative Political Economy Who Pays for Environmental Policy? Business Power and the Design of State-Level Climate Policies* Supervising Local Cadres in China: The Quest for Authoritarian Accountability Rethinking Antitrust for the Cloud Era Antitrust and Equal Liberty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1