人工池塘中与本地生产相关的高碳埋藏率

IF 5.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 LIMNOLOGY Limnology and Oceanography Letters Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1002/lol2.10351
Meredith A. Holgerson, Nicholas E. Ray, Chelsea Russ
{"title":"人工池塘中与本地生产相关的高碳埋藏率","authors":"Meredith A. Holgerson,&nbsp;Nicholas E. Ray,&nbsp;Chelsea Russ","doi":"10.1002/lol2.10351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ponds are globally abundant and important to the global carbon cycle. Although ponds have large greenhouse gas emissions, they also sequester carbon in their sediments. Here, we studied organic carbon (OC) burial rates in 22 temperate experimental ponds with negligible watersheds, where carbon sequestration derives solely from autochthonous primary production. The ponds were built identically in 1964 and have since experienced different management strategies, allowing us to test how management actions influence burial rates. On average, the ponds accumulated 67.1 g OC m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (range 38.3–113.6 g OC m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>)—about double the global average burial rate for lakes and similar to global averages for wetlands. Carbon burial rates were higher in ponds with macrophytes, fish, and higher N : P loads. We contend that the global carbon sink for inland waters may be substantially underestimated due to the undervaluation of OC burial in natural and artificial ponds.</p>","PeriodicalId":18128,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography Letters","volume":"9 1","pages":"43-51"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lol2.10351","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High rates of carbon burial linked to autochthonous production in artificial ponds\",\"authors\":\"Meredith A. Holgerson,&nbsp;Nicholas E. Ray,&nbsp;Chelsea Russ\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lol2.10351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Ponds are globally abundant and important to the global carbon cycle. Although ponds have large greenhouse gas emissions, they also sequester carbon in their sediments. Here, we studied organic carbon (OC) burial rates in 22 temperate experimental ponds with negligible watersheds, where carbon sequestration derives solely from autochthonous primary production. The ponds were built identically in 1964 and have since experienced different management strategies, allowing us to test how management actions influence burial rates. On average, the ponds accumulated 67.1 g OC m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (range 38.3–113.6 g OC m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>)—about double the global average burial rate for lakes and similar to global averages for wetlands. Carbon burial rates were higher in ponds with macrophytes, fish, and higher N : P loads. We contend that the global carbon sink for inland waters may be substantially underestimated due to the undervaluation of OC burial in natural and artificial ponds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Limnology and Oceanography Letters\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"43-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lol2.10351\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Limnology and Oceanography Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lol2.10351\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lol2.10351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

池塘在全球范围内非常丰富,对全球碳循环非常重要。尽管池塘有大量的温室气体排放,但它们也能在沉积物中封存碳。在这里,我们研究了22个可忽略流域的温带实验池塘中的有机碳(OC)埋藏率,这些池塘的碳固存仅来自当地的初级生产。这些池塘在1964年同样建造,此后经历了不同的管理策略,使我们能够测试管理行为如何影响埋葬率。平均而言,池塘累积了67.1 g OC m−2 1年(范围38.3–113.6 g OC m−2 yr−1)——大约是全球湖泊平均埋葬率的两倍,与全球湿地平均埋葬率相似。在有大型植物、鱼类和较高氮的池塘中,碳埋藏率较高 : P负载。我们认为,由于对天然和人工池塘中OC埋藏的低估,内陆水域的全球碳汇可能被大大低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High rates of carbon burial linked to autochthonous production in artificial ponds

Ponds are globally abundant and important to the global carbon cycle. Although ponds have large greenhouse gas emissions, they also sequester carbon in their sediments. Here, we studied organic carbon (OC) burial rates in 22 temperate experimental ponds with negligible watersheds, where carbon sequestration derives solely from autochthonous primary production. The ponds were built identically in 1964 and have since experienced different management strategies, allowing us to test how management actions influence burial rates. On average, the ponds accumulated 67.1 g OC m−2 yr−1 (range 38.3–113.6 g OC m−2 yr−1)—about double the global average burial rate for lakes and similar to global averages for wetlands. Carbon burial rates were higher in ponds with macrophytes, fish, and higher N : P loads. We contend that the global carbon sink for inland waters may be substantially underestimated due to the undervaluation of OC burial in natural and artificial ponds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography Letters (LO-Letters) serves as a platform for communicating the latest innovative and trend-setting research in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts submitted to LO-Letters are expected to present high-impact, cutting-edge results, discoveries, or conceptual developments across all areas of limnology and oceanography, including their integration. Selection criteria for manuscripts include their broad relevance to the field, strong empirical and conceptual foundations, succinct and elegant conclusions, and potential to advance knowledge in aquatic sciences.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Capitalizing on the wealth of chemical data in the accretionary structures of aquatic taxa: Opportunities from across the tree of life The Great Lakes Winter Grab: Limnological data from a multi‐institutional winter sampling campaign on the Laurentian Great Lakes Disentangling effects of droughts and heatwaves on alpine periphyton communities: A mesocosm experiment Snow removal cools a small dystrophic lake
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1