小学英语作为外语学习者的半球优势、元认知阅读策略偏好与阅读理解的关系

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reading & Writing Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-12-07 DOI:10.1080/10573569.2020.1846005
Ali Arabmofrad, Mehdi Badi, Mehran Rajaee Pitehnoee
{"title":"小学英语作为外语学习者的半球优势、元认知阅读策略偏好与阅读理解的关系","authors":"Ali Arabmofrad, Mehdi Badi, Mehran Rajaee Pitehnoee","doi":"10.1080/10573569.2020.1846005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The past decade has witnessed a plethora of research to study the relationship between reading strategies and reading comprehension, but few studies have examined the brain functionality; more specifically the relationship between hemispheric dominance and reading strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether there would be any relationship among elementary English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ hemispheric dominance (Left, Right and Whole-brained dominance), their reading strategies, and reading comprehension. To this end, 67 elementary EFL students were selected based on convenience sampling. After determining the participants’ brain dominance, they completed a survey of reading strategies (RS) in order to identify their general preferences of reading strategies. Then a Reading Comprehension Test (RC) was administered to examine the students’ reading comprehension proficiency. The results demonstrated that most of the students were left-brain who generally preferred to employ problem-solving strategies (PROB). Furthermore, no significant relationship was found between hemispheric dominance, reading strategies, and reading comprehension of Iranian elementary EFL students. The results had also some implications for teachers stating that they should consider their students’ individual differences in terms of hemisphericity and adopt or balance their teaching techniques based on the students’ brain dominance types (learning styles and strategies) or at least to be sensitive to that.","PeriodicalId":51619,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","volume":"37 1","pages":"413 - 424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10573569.2020.1846005","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship among Elementary English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Hemispheric Dominance, Metacognitive Reading Strategies Preferences, and Reading Comprehension\",\"authors\":\"Ali Arabmofrad, Mehdi Badi, Mehran Rajaee Pitehnoee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10573569.2020.1846005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The past decade has witnessed a plethora of research to study the relationship between reading strategies and reading comprehension, but few studies have examined the brain functionality; more specifically the relationship between hemispheric dominance and reading strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether there would be any relationship among elementary English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ hemispheric dominance (Left, Right and Whole-brained dominance), their reading strategies, and reading comprehension. To this end, 67 elementary EFL students were selected based on convenience sampling. After determining the participants’ brain dominance, they completed a survey of reading strategies (RS) in order to identify their general preferences of reading strategies. Then a Reading Comprehension Test (RC) was administered to examine the students’ reading comprehension proficiency. The results demonstrated that most of the students were left-brain who generally preferred to employ problem-solving strategies (PROB). Furthermore, no significant relationship was found between hemispheric dominance, reading strategies, and reading comprehension of Iranian elementary EFL students. The results had also some implications for teachers stating that they should consider their students’ individual differences in terms of hemisphericity and adopt or balance their teaching techniques based on the students’ brain dominance types (learning styles and strategies) or at least to be sensitive to that.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading & Writing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"413 - 424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10573569.2020.1846005\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading & Writing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1846005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1846005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要在过去的十年里,人们对阅读策略和阅读理解之间的关系进行了大量的研究,但很少有研究考察大脑功能;更具体地说,半球优势与阅读策略之间的关系。因此,本研究旨在调查基础英语作为外语(EFL)学习者的半球优势(左、右和全脑优势)、阅读策略和阅读理解之间是否存在任何关系。为此,采用方便抽样的方法,选取了67名小学EFL学生。在确定了参与者的大脑优势后,他们完成了一项阅读策略调查,以确定他们对阅读策略的总体偏好。然后进行阅读理解测试来检验学生的阅读理解能力。研究结果表明,大多数学生都是左脑,他们通常更喜欢使用解决问题的策略(PROB)。此外,伊朗小学生的半球优势、阅读策略和阅读理解之间没有发现显著的关系。这一结果也对教师产生了一些影响,他们表示,他们应该考虑学生在半球性方面的个体差异,并根据学生的大脑优势类型(学习风格和策略)采用或平衡教学技术,或者至少对此保持敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Relationship among Elementary English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Hemispheric Dominance, Metacognitive Reading Strategies Preferences, and Reading Comprehension
Abstract The past decade has witnessed a plethora of research to study the relationship between reading strategies and reading comprehension, but few studies have examined the brain functionality; more specifically the relationship between hemispheric dominance and reading strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether there would be any relationship among elementary English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ hemispheric dominance (Left, Right and Whole-brained dominance), their reading strategies, and reading comprehension. To this end, 67 elementary EFL students were selected based on convenience sampling. After determining the participants’ brain dominance, they completed a survey of reading strategies (RS) in order to identify their general preferences of reading strategies. Then a Reading Comprehension Test (RC) was administered to examine the students’ reading comprehension proficiency. The results demonstrated that most of the students were left-brain who generally preferred to employ problem-solving strategies (PROB). Furthermore, no significant relationship was found between hemispheric dominance, reading strategies, and reading comprehension of Iranian elementary EFL students. The results had also some implications for teachers stating that they should consider their students’ individual differences in terms of hemisphericity and adopt or balance their teaching techniques based on the students’ brain dominance types (learning styles and strategies) or at least to be sensitive to that.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Argumentative Writing for Students With Disabilities in Inclusive Science Classes: A Pilot Study Online Intervention to Prevent Summer Learning Loss For Struggling First Grade Writers Can Artificial Intelligence Identify Reading Fluency and Level? Comparison of Human and Machine Performance Exploring Relations between Teachers’ Language- and Code-Based Writing Supports to Early Literacy and Vocabulary Learning in Children with Language Vulnerabilities The Technical Adequacy of Coding Procedures for Retell Measures in Elementary School Students with Dyslexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1