say动词真的通过从句组合语法化为补语吗?

IF 0.6 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Functions of Language Pub Date : 2022-11-29 DOI:10.1075/fol.21023.den
Haiping Long, Chuanlin Deng
{"title":"say动词真的通过从句组合语法化为补语吗?","authors":"Haiping Long, Chuanlin Deng","doi":"10.1075/fol.21023.den","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n When a ‘say’ clause is combined with a quoted-speech clause, one of two hypothetical pathways may be followed: (a)\n a complementation pathway on which the ‘say’ clause takes the quoted-speech clause as its complement clause and thus becomes its\n matrix clause; (b) a conjoining pathway which involves no syntactic operation but rather the loss of a prosodic gap between the\n two. Following the second pathway, ‘say’ may become grammaticalized into a quotative particle. On neither pathway is ‘say’\n grammaticalized into a complementizer. It is proposed that cross-linguistically so-called ‘say’ complementizers, including the\n alleged Chinese complementizer shuō, are more likely to be not complementizers but rather quotative\n particles.","PeriodicalId":44232,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do ‘say’ verbs really grammaticalize into complementizers through clause combination?\",\"authors\":\"Haiping Long, Chuanlin Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/fol.21023.den\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n When a ‘say’ clause is combined with a quoted-speech clause, one of two hypothetical pathways may be followed: (a)\\n a complementation pathway on which the ‘say’ clause takes the quoted-speech clause as its complement clause and thus becomes its\\n matrix clause; (b) a conjoining pathway which involves no syntactic operation but rather the loss of a prosodic gap between the\\n two. Following the second pathway, ‘say’ may become grammaticalized into a quotative particle. On neither pathway is ‘say’\\n grammaticalized into a complementizer. It is proposed that cross-linguistically so-called ‘say’ complementizers, including the\\n alleged Chinese complementizer shuō, are more likely to be not complementizers but rather quotative\\n particles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Functions of Language\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Functions of Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21023.den\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functions of Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21023.den","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当“说”从句与引语从句结合时,可能会遵循两种假设途径之一:(a)一种互补途径,“说”子句将引语从句作为其补语从句,从而成为其矩阵从句;(b) 一种不涉及句法操作而是在两者之间失去韵律间隙的联合途径。按照第二种途径,“say”可能会被语法化为引用助词。在这两条路径上,“say”都没有语法化为补语词。有人提出,跨语言的所谓“说”补语词,包括所谓的汉语补语词shuō,更有可能不是补语词而是引用助词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do ‘say’ verbs really grammaticalize into complementizers through clause combination?
When a ‘say’ clause is combined with a quoted-speech clause, one of two hypothetical pathways may be followed: (a) a complementation pathway on which the ‘say’ clause takes the quoted-speech clause as its complement clause and thus becomes its matrix clause; (b) a conjoining pathway which involves no syntactic operation but rather the loss of a prosodic gap between the two. Following the second pathway, ‘say’ may become grammaticalized into a quotative particle. On neither pathway is ‘say’ grammaticalized into a complementizer. It is proposed that cross-linguistically so-called ‘say’ complementizers, including the alleged Chinese complementizer shuō, are more likely to be not complementizers but rather quotative particles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Functions of Language is an international journal of linguistics which explores the functionalist perspective on the organisation and use of natural language. It encourages the interplay of theory and description, and provides space for the detailed analysis, qualitative or quantitative, of linguistic data from a broad range of languages. Its scope is broad, covering such matters as prosodic phenomena in phonology, the clause in its communicative context, and regularities of pragmatics, conversation and discourse, as well as the interaction between the various levels of analysis. The overall purpose is to contribute to our understanding of how the use of languages in speech and writing has impacted, and continues to impact, upon the structure of those languages.
期刊最新文献
The functions of evidentiality On the co-optation of according to as an evidential in English Review of Martin, Quiroz & Wang (2023): Systemic functional grammar: A text-based description of English, Spanish and Chinese Review of Yus (2023): Pragmatics of internet humour Definite-like meaning of bare classifiers in Nung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1