桥隧过渡对有侧风和无侧风列车空气动力学性能影响的比较研究

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Wind and Structures Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.12989/WAS.2021.32.6.597
Lei Zhou, Tang-hong Liu, Zhengwei Chen, Wen-hui Li, Zi-jian Guo, Xuhui He, Youwu Wang
{"title":"桥隧过渡对有侧风和无侧风列车空气动力学性能影响的比较研究","authors":"Lei Zhou, Tang-hong Liu, Zhengwei Chen, Wen-hui Li, Zi-jian Guo, Xuhui He, Youwu Wang","doi":"10.12989/WAS.2021.32.6.597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studied the case of high-speed train running from flat ground to bridges and into/out of tunnels, with or \nwithout crosswind based on the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method. First, the flow structure was analyzed to explain \nthe influence mechanisms of different infrastructures on the aerodynamic characteristics of the train. Then, the evolution of \naerodynamic forces of the train during the entire process was analyzed and compared. Additionally, the pressure variation on the \ntrain body and the tunnel wall was examined in detail. The results showed that the pressure coefficient and the flow structure on \nboth sides of the high-speed train were symmetrical for no crosswind case. By contrast, under crosswind, there was a \ntremendous and immediate change in the pressure mapping and flow structure when the train passing through the bridge-tunnel section. The influence of the ground-bridge transition on the aerodynamic forces was much smaller than that of the bridge-tunnel section. Moreover, the variation of aerodynamic load during the process of entering and exiting the bridge-tunnel sections was both significant. In addition, in the case without crosswind, the change in the pressure change in the tunnel conformed to the law of pressure wave propagation, while under crosswind, the variation in pressure was comprehensively affected by both the train and crosswind in the tunnel.","PeriodicalId":51210,"journal":{"name":"Wind and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison study of the effect of bridge-tunnel transition on train aerodynamic performance with or without crosswind\",\"authors\":\"Lei Zhou, Tang-hong Liu, Zhengwei Chen, Wen-hui Li, Zi-jian Guo, Xuhui He, Youwu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.12989/WAS.2021.32.6.597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studied the case of high-speed train running from flat ground to bridges and into/out of tunnels, with or \\nwithout crosswind based on the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method. First, the flow structure was analyzed to explain \\nthe influence mechanisms of different infrastructures on the aerodynamic characteristics of the train. Then, the evolution of \\naerodynamic forces of the train during the entire process was analyzed and compared. Additionally, the pressure variation on the \\ntrain body and the tunnel wall was examined in detail. The results showed that the pressure coefficient and the flow structure on \\nboth sides of the high-speed train were symmetrical for no crosswind case. By contrast, under crosswind, there was a \\ntremendous and immediate change in the pressure mapping and flow structure when the train passing through the bridge-tunnel section. The influence of the ground-bridge transition on the aerodynamic forces was much smaller than that of the bridge-tunnel section. Moreover, the variation of aerodynamic load during the process of entering and exiting the bridge-tunnel sections was both significant. In addition, in the case without crosswind, the change in the pressure change in the tunnel conformed to the law of pressure wave propagation, while under crosswind, the variation in pressure was comprehensively affected by both the train and crosswind in the tunnel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wind and Structures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wind and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12989/WAS.2021.32.6.597\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wind and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/WAS.2021.32.6.597","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文基于计算流体力学(CFD)方法,研究了高速列车在有无侧风的情况下,从平坦地面进入桥梁和进出隧道的情况。首先,对流动结构进行了分析,解释了不同基础设施对列车气动特性的影响机理。然后,对列车在整个过程中的气动力演化进行了分析和比较。此外,还对列车车体和隧道壁的压力变化进行了详细分析。结果表明:在无侧风情况下,高速列车两侧的压力系数和流动结构是对称的;而在侧风作用下,列车通过桥隧段时,压力分布和水流结构会发生巨大而直接的变化。地桥过渡段对气动力的影响远小于桥隧段。此外,在进入和退出桥隧段的过程中,气动载荷的变化也很显著。此外,在无侧风情况下,隧道内压力变化符合压力波传播规律,而在侧风情况下,隧道内压力变化综合受到列车和侧风的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison study of the effect of bridge-tunnel transition on train aerodynamic performance with or without crosswind
This paper studied the case of high-speed train running from flat ground to bridges and into/out of tunnels, with or without crosswind based on the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method. First, the flow structure was analyzed to explain the influence mechanisms of different infrastructures on the aerodynamic characteristics of the train. Then, the evolution of aerodynamic forces of the train during the entire process was analyzed and compared. Additionally, the pressure variation on the train body and the tunnel wall was examined in detail. The results showed that the pressure coefficient and the flow structure on both sides of the high-speed train were symmetrical for no crosswind case. By contrast, under crosswind, there was a tremendous and immediate change in the pressure mapping and flow structure when the train passing through the bridge-tunnel section. The influence of the ground-bridge transition on the aerodynamic forces was much smaller than that of the bridge-tunnel section. Moreover, the variation of aerodynamic load during the process of entering and exiting the bridge-tunnel sections was both significant. In addition, in the case without crosswind, the change in the pressure change in the tunnel conformed to the law of pressure wave propagation, while under crosswind, the variation in pressure was comprehensively affected by both the train and crosswind in the tunnel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wind and Structures
Wind and Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The WIND AND STRUCTURES, An International Journal, aims at: - Major publication channel for research in the general area of wind and structural engineering, - Wider distribution at more affordable subscription rates; - Faster reviewing and publication for manuscripts submitted. The main theme of the Journal is the wind effects on structures. Areas covered by the journal include: Wind loads and structural response, Bluff-body aerodynamics, Computational method, Wind tunnel modeling, Local wind environment, Codes and regulations, Wind effects on large scale structures.
期刊最新文献
Challenges and Perspectives of Wind Energy Technology Responses of a Modular Floating Wind TLP of MarsVAWT Supporting a 10 MW Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Wind Power Forecasting in a Semi-Arid Region Based on Machine Learning Error Correction Scaling Challenges for Conical Plain Bearings as Wind Turbine Main Bearings Numerical Modeling and Application of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine Arrays in Large Wind Farms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1