谁代表谁发言?

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Historical Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI:10.1075/jhp.18013.xia
Mingjian Xiang, Esther Pascual, Bosen Ma
{"title":"谁代表谁发言?","authors":"Mingjian Xiang, Esther Pascual, Bosen Ma","doi":"10.1075/jhp.18013.xia","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper deals with rhetorically intended questions in the Zhuangzi, a foundational text of\n Daoism (fourth century bc). Such questions are generally meant to evoke silent answers in the addressee’s mind, thereby\n involving a fictive type of interaction (Pascual 2006, 2014). We analyse rhetorical questions as constructions of intersubjectivity (see Verhagen 2005, 2008), involving not just a conceptual\n integration of question and assertion but also a viewpoint blend (Dancygier and Sweetser [eds]\n 2012). They involve fusing the perspectives of the writer, the assumed prospective readers, and possibly also that of\n the discourse characters (in the case of rhetorical questions ascribed to a discourse character but meant to represent the\n writer’s voice). In this highly influential text with abundant mixed viewpoint scenarios, the interpretation of rhetorical\n questions involves the resolution of different viewpoints, which are set up and shifted in a multi-layered manner for particular\n argumentative purposes.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who’s speaking for whom?\",\"authors\":\"Mingjian Xiang, Esther Pascual, Bosen Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhp.18013.xia\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper deals with rhetorically intended questions in the Zhuangzi, a foundational text of\\n Daoism (fourth century bc). Such questions are generally meant to evoke silent answers in the addressee’s mind, thereby\\n involving a fictive type of interaction (Pascual 2006, 2014). We analyse rhetorical questions as constructions of intersubjectivity (see Verhagen 2005, 2008), involving not just a conceptual\\n integration of question and assertion but also a viewpoint blend (Dancygier and Sweetser [eds]\\n 2012). They involve fusing the perspectives of the writer, the assumed prospective readers, and possibly also that of\\n the discourse characters (in the case of rhetorical questions ascribed to a discourse character but meant to represent the\\n writer’s voice). In this highly influential text with abundant mixed viewpoint scenarios, the interpretation of rhetorical\\n questions involves the resolution of different viewpoints, which are set up and shifted in a multi-layered manner for particular\\n argumentative purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.18013.xia\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.18013.xia","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《庄子》是道教的奠基文本,其修辞学问题是本文研究的重点。这样的问题通常是为了在收件人的脑海中唤起沉默的答案,从而涉及到一种虚拟的互动类型(Pascual 2006, 2014)。我们将修辞问题作为主体间性的结构进行分析(参见Verhagen 2005,2008),不仅涉及问题和断言的概念整合,还涉及观点融合(Dancygier和Sweetser[主编]2012)。它们包括融合作者的观点,假设的潜在读者的观点,也可能是话语角色的观点(在归因于话语角色的反问句的情况下,它代表了作者的声音)。在这部有着丰富的混合观点场景的极具影响力的文本中,修辞学问题的解释涉及不同观点的解决,这些观点以多层次的方式建立和转移,以达到特定的论证目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who’s speaking for whom?
This paper deals with rhetorically intended questions in the Zhuangzi, a foundational text of Daoism (fourth century bc). Such questions are generally meant to evoke silent answers in the addressee’s mind, thereby involving a fictive type of interaction (Pascual 2006, 2014). We analyse rhetorical questions as constructions of intersubjectivity (see Verhagen 2005, 2008), involving not just a conceptual integration of question and assertion but also a viewpoint blend (Dancygier and Sweetser [eds] 2012). They involve fusing the perspectives of the writer, the assumed prospective readers, and possibly also that of the discourse characters (in the case of rhetorical questions ascribed to a discourse character but meant to represent the writer’s voice). In this highly influential text with abundant mixed viewpoint scenarios, the interpretation of rhetorical questions involves the resolution of different viewpoints, which are set up and shifted in a multi-layered manner for particular argumentative purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.
期刊最新文献
Women’s voices in the public sphere Democratisation Colloquialisation A corpus-pragmatic analysis of linguistic democratisation in the British Hansard Speaking for the downtrodden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1