硬膜外麻醉与椎旁神经阻滞在非插管单门静脉胸腔镜手术中的比较

Panpan Li, X. Lang
{"title":"硬膜外麻醉与椎旁神经阻滞在非插管单门静脉胸腔镜手术中的比较","authors":"Panpan Li, X. Lang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2020.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"目的 \n比较硬膜外麻醉与椎旁神经阻滞非气管插管单孔胸腔镜手术的效果。 \n \n \n方法 \n选择2017年11月至2019年6月锦州医科大学附属第一医院收治的45例采用非气管插管麻醉单孔胸腔镜手术的肺部良恶性肿瘤患者,采用随机数字表法分为椎旁神经阻滞组(22例)与硬膜外麻醉组(23例)。麻醉诱导前,椎旁神经阻滞组均于超声引导下阻滞胸3~6棘突旁神经根;硬膜外麻醉组均于胸6~7或7~8间隙行硬膜外穿刺置管麻醉。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后定向力恢复时间、下床活动时间、带管时间、出院时间及相关并发症。 \n \n \n结果 \n两组患者手术时间、术中出血量差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与硬膜外麻醉组相比,椎旁神经阻滞组术后定向力恢复时间[(7.22±2.20)min比(18.80±5.06)min]、下床活动时间[(11.45±3.01)h比(21.90±4.61)h]、带管时间[(2.77±0.81)d比(5.47±1.31)d]、出院时间[(3.68±0.84)d比(6.17±1.03)d]均缩短,两组差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-9.874、-8.763、-8.282、-7.594,均P<0.05)。椎旁神经阻滞组术后未发生低氧血症、低血压、肺部并发症、恶心、呕吐、尿潴留等相关并发症。 \n \n \n结论 \n非气管插管单孔胸腔镜手术中采用椎旁神经阻滞术后恢复快、并发症少,临床上可优先选择,有助于快速康复。","PeriodicalId":9505,"journal":{"name":"肿瘤研究与临床","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of epidural anesthesia with paravertebral nerve block for non-intubated uniportal video-assisted thoraeoseopic surgery\",\"authors\":\"Panpan Li, X. Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2020.01.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"目的 \\n比较硬膜外麻醉与椎旁神经阻滞非气管插管单孔胸腔镜手术的效果。 \\n \\n \\n方法 \\n选择2017年11月至2019年6月锦州医科大学附属第一医院收治的45例采用非气管插管麻醉单孔胸腔镜手术的肺部良恶性肿瘤患者,采用随机数字表法分为椎旁神经阻滞组(22例)与硬膜外麻醉组(23例)。麻醉诱导前,椎旁神经阻滞组均于超声引导下阻滞胸3~6棘突旁神经根;硬膜外麻醉组均于胸6~7或7~8间隙行硬膜外穿刺置管麻醉。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后定向力恢复时间、下床活动时间、带管时间、出院时间及相关并发症。 \\n \\n \\n结果 \\n两组患者手术时间、术中出血量差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与硬膜外麻醉组相比,椎旁神经阻滞组术后定向力恢复时间[(7.22±2.20)min比(18.80±5.06)min]、下床活动时间[(11.45±3.01)h比(21.90±4.61)h]、带管时间[(2.77±0.81)d比(5.47±1.31)d]、出院时间[(3.68±0.84)d比(6.17±1.03)d]均缩短,两组差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-9.874、-8.763、-8.282、-7.594,均P<0.05)。椎旁神经阻滞组术后未发生低氧血症、低血压、肺部并发症、恶心、呕吐、尿潴留等相关并发症。 \\n \\n \\n结论 \\n非气管插管单孔胸腔镜手术中采用椎旁神经阻滞术后恢复快、并发症少,临床上可优先选择,有助于快速康复。\",\"PeriodicalId\":9505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"肿瘤研究与临床\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"肿瘤研究与临床\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2020.01.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"肿瘤研究与临床","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2020.01.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Objective To compare the effects of epidural anesthesia and paravertebral nerve block on non tracheal intubation single hole thoracoscopic surgery. Method: A total of 45 patients with benign and malignant lung tumors who underwent non tracheal intubation anesthesia single hole thoracoscopic surgery and were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University from November 2017 to June 2019 were randomly divided into a paravertebral nerve block group (22 cases) and an epidural anesthesia group (23 cases) using a random number table method. Before induction of anesthesia, the paravertebral nerve block group was guided by ultrasound to block the thoracic 3-6 spinous nerve roots; The epidural anesthesia group underwent epidural puncture and catheterization anesthesia in the 6-7 or 7-8 intervals of the chest. Compare the surgical time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative recovery time of directional force, time of getting out of bed activity, time of catheterization, discharge time, and related complications between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in surgical time and intraoperative bleeding between the two groups of patients (both P>0.05). Compared with the epidural anesthesia group, the paraspinal nerve block group had shorter postoperative directional recovery time [(7.22 ± 2.20) minutes compared to (18.80 ± 5.06) minutes], ambulation time [(11.45 ± 3.01) hours compared to (21.90 ± 4.61) hours], tube insertion time [(2.77 ± 0.81) days compared to (5.47 ± 1.31) days], and discharge time [(3.68 ± 0.84) days compared to (6.17 ± 1.03) days], The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (t-values were -9.874, -8.763, -8.282, -7.594, all P<0.05). In the paravertebral nerve block group, there were no postoperative complications such as hypoxemia, hypotension, pulmonary complications, nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention. Conclusion: The use of paravertebral nerve block in non tracheal intubation single hole thoracoscopic surgery has fast recovery and fewer complications, and can be prioritized in clinical practice, which is helpful for rapid recovery.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of epidural anesthesia with paravertebral nerve block for non-intubated uniportal video-assisted thoraeoseopic surgery
目的 比较硬膜外麻醉与椎旁神经阻滞非气管插管单孔胸腔镜手术的效果。 方法 选择2017年11月至2019年6月锦州医科大学附属第一医院收治的45例采用非气管插管麻醉单孔胸腔镜手术的肺部良恶性肿瘤患者,采用随机数字表法分为椎旁神经阻滞组(22例)与硬膜外麻醉组(23例)。麻醉诱导前,椎旁神经阻滞组均于超声引导下阻滞胸3~6棘突旁神经根;硬膜外麻醉组均于胸6~7或7~8间隙行硬膜外穿刺置管麻醉。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后定向力恢复时间、下床活动时间、带管时间、出院时间及相关并发症。 结果 两组患者手术时间、术中出血量差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与硬膜外麻醉组相比,椎旁神经阻滞组术后定向力恢复时间[(7.22±2.20)min比(18.80±5.06)min]、下床活动时间[(11.45±3.01)h比(21.90±4.61)h]、带管时间[(2.77±0.81)d比(5.47±1.31)d]、出院时间[(3.68±0.84)d比(6.17±1.03)d]均缩短,两组差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-9.874、-8.763、-8.282、-7.594,均P<0.05)。椎旁神经阻滞组术后未发生低氧血症、低血压、肺部并发症、恶心、呕吐、尿潴留等相关并发症。 结论 非气管插管单孔胸腔镜手术中采用椎旁神经阻滞术后恢复快、并发症少,临床上可优先选择,有助于快速康复。
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
肿瘤研究与临床
肿瘤研究与临床 Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7737
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Progress of the relationship between breast cancer and thyroid diseases Analysis of cancer incidence and mortality in registration areas of Shanxi Province in 2014 Expressions of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in recurrent patients after radical gastrectomy and its significance Progress of molecular markers related to papillary thyroid carcinoma Significance of changes of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1