“家庭政策”:我们如何定义它?

Q4 Social Sciences Enfances, Familles, Generations Pub Date : 2020-08-20 DOI:10.7202/1077676ar
G. Séraphin, Nathalie St-Amour
{"title":"“家庭政策”:我们如何定义它?","authors":"G. Séraphin, Nathalie St-Amour","doi":"10.7202/1077676ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research Framework: This article is part of a broader reflection on the future of family policies, including their beneficiaries, the change of levels responsible for their development and implementation, and the delegitimization of intermediary bodies involved in this process. Objectives: To better define the parameters of family policies and to outline the elements of a frame of reference that could be used to map the scope of this policy area in different countries. Methodology: This article is based on the contributions in this thematic issue, a review of the literature, and the research expertise of the authors. Results: The ideas presented in this article focus on delimiting the scope of family policies by analyzing the beneficiaries, the intervention fields, the founding principle(s) and the actors. Based on the cases of France and Quebec, the authors present, in the form of questions, the criteria that could make it possible to define how family policy is defined in a given region. Conclusions: At international and often at national levels, the scope of family policy still appears vague. In fact, it is impossible to provide a single and shared definition, adapted to all the countries where the term is used. Despite some commonalities, \"family policy\" remains difficult to define. Contribution: The authors confirm that family policies cannot be understood without being considered in the context of the current dynamic of the social state as a whole.","PeriodicalId":38709,"journal":{"name":"Enfances, Familles, Generations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Family policy\\\": How do we define it?\",\"authors\":\"G. Séraphin, Nathalie St-Amour\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1077676ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research Framework: This article is part of a broader reflection on the future of family policies, including their beneficiaries, the change of levels responsible for their development and implementation, and the delegitimization of intermediary bodies involved in this process. Objectives: To better define the parameters of family policies and to outline the elements of a frame of reference that could be used to map the scope of this policy area in different countries. Methodology: This article is based on the contributions in this thematic issue, a review of the literature, and the research expertise of the authors. Results: The ideas presented in this article focus on delimiting the scope of family policies by analyzing the beneficiaries, the intervention fields, the founding principle(s) and the actors. Based on the cases of France and Quebec, the authors present, in the form of questions, the criteria that could make it possible to define how family policy is defined in a given region. Conclusions: At international and often at national levels, the scope of family policy still appears vague. In fact, it is impossible to provide a single and shared definition, adapted to all the countries where the term is used. Despite some commonalities, \\\"family policy\\\" remains difficult to define. Contribution: The authors confirm that family policies cannot be understood without being considered in the context of the current dynamic of the social state as a whole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfances, Familles, Generations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfances, Familles, Generations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1077676ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfances, Familles, Generations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1077676ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究框架:这篇文章是对家庭政策未来的更广泛反思的一部分,包括其受益者、负责制定和实施家庭政策的级别的变化,以及参与这一过程的中介机构的非法性。目标:更好地界定家庭政策的参数,并概述可用于绘制不同国家这一政策领域范围图的参考框架的要素。方法论:本文基于本专题的贡献、文献综述和作者的研究专长。结果:本文提出的观点侧重于通过分析受益者、干预领域、建立原则和行为者来界定家庭政策的范围。根据法国和魁北克的案例,作者以问题的形式提出了一些标准,这些标准可以确定在特定地区如何定义家庭政策。结论:在国际和国家一级,家庭政策的范围似乎仍然模糊不清。事实上,不可能提供一个单一和共享的定义,适用于所有使用该术语的国家。尽管有一些共同点,“家庭政策”仍然难以界定。贡献:作者确认,如果不从当前整个社会状态的动态来看,就无法理解家庭政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Family policy": How do we define it?
Research Framework: This article is part of a broader reflection on the future of family policies, including their beneficiaries, the change of levels responsible for their development and implementation, and the delegitimization of intermediary bodies involved in this process. Objectives: To better define the parameters of family policies and to outline the elements of a frame of reference that could be used to map the scope of this policy area in different countries. Methodology: This article is based on the contributions in this thematic issue, a review of the literature, and the research expertise of the authors. Results: The ideas presented in this article focus on delimiting the scope of family policies by analyzing the beneficiaries, the intervention fields, the founding principle(s) and the actors. Based on the cases of France and Quebec, the authors present, in the form of questions, the criteria that could make it possible to define how family policy is defined in a given region. Conclusions: At international and often at national levels, the scope of family policy still appears vague. In fact, it is impossible to provide a single and shared definition, adapted to all the countries where the term is used. Despite some commonalities, "family policy" remains difficult to define. Contribution: The authors confirm that family policies cannot be understood without being considered in the context of the current dynamic of the social state as a whole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Enfances, Familles, Generations
Enfances, Familles, Generations Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Im/migration: Family Strategies and Access to Rights Vieillir chez soi en situation de dépendance : attachement au domicile et (dis)continuité identitaire au grand âge Home and the Limits of Individualization: Imbalance Between Personal, Statutory, and Belonging spaces L’individu à l’épreuve du chez-soi Réinvestir son foyer lors d’un cancer, une menace pour l’individualisation des adolescent∙e∙s ? Retours d’expériences maternelles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1