普通教育教师对残疾学生全纳教育的认知意义

Guadalupe Elizabeth Morales-Martinez, Y. Mezquita-Hoyos, Claudia Castro-Campos
{"title":"普通教育教师对残疾学生全纳教育的认知意义","authors":"Guadalupe Elizabeth Morales-Martinez, Y. Mezquita-Hoyos, Claudia Castro-Campos","doi":"10.6000/2292-2598.2022.10.06.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Successful inclusive education strongly represents the development of society, promoting better living conditions for students with disabilities. \nObjective: This study explored the mental representation of knowledge of inclusive education and disability held by regular education teachers with experience in this field. \nMethods: First, participants performed a conceptual definition task through the Natural Semantic Networks technique. Teachers defined ten target concepts related to the cognitive schema of inclusive education. They had 60 seconds to define each target, using verbs, adjectives, nouns, and pronouns, after rating the definers’ quality to conceptualize the target. Subsequently, the authors implemented a constraint satisfaction neural network to simulate the school inclusion schema's behavior and carried out a chronometric cognitive analysis using data from the first study. \nResults: Participants organized the educative inclusion meaning on four dimensions (definition, actors' qualities, stakeholders, and inclusion program effects). However, some concepts about school integration and conventional education appeared in the educative inclusion schema. Further, computer simulations showed that participants seem to have an internal locus of control over inclusive actions. Generally, experience with students with disabilities promotes the formation of a favorable educational inclusion schema. However, even though participants in this study have experience in inclusion programs, they are still constructing the inclusive education schema. \nConclusion: The cognitive evaluation provides useful information to empower teachers to be aware of their knowledge and biases on inclusive education and the importance of their work in the success of school inclusion programs.","PeriodicalId":37806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Meaning of Inclusive Education of Students with Disability in Regular Education Teachers\",\"authors\":\"Guadalupe Elizabeth Morales-Martinez, Y. Mezquita-Hoyos, Claudia Castro-Campos\",\"doi\":\"10.6000/2292-2598.2022.10.06.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Successful inclusive education strongly represents the development of society, promoting better living conditions for students with disabilities. \\nObjective: This study explored the mental representation of knowledge of inclusive education and disability held by regular education teachers with experience in this field. \\nMethods: First, participants performed a conceptual definition task through the Natural Semantic Networks technique. Teachers defined ten target concepts related to the cognitive schema of inclusive education. They had 60 seconds to define each target, using verbs, adjectives, nouns, and pronouns, after rating the definers’ quality to conceptualize the target. Subsequently, the authors implemented a constraint satisfaction neural network to simulate the school inclusion schema's behavior and carried out a chronometric cognitive analysis using data from the first study. \\nResults: Participants organized the educative inclusion meaning on four dimensions (definition, actors' qualities, stakeholders, and inclusion program effects). However, some concepts about school integration and conventional education appeared in the educative inclusion schema. Further, computer simulations showed that participants seem to have an internal locus of control over inclusive actions. Generally, experience with students with disabilities promotes the formation of a favorable educational inclusion schema. However, even though participants in this study have experience in inclusion programs, they are still constructing the inclusive education schema. \\nConclusion: The cognitive evaluation provides useful information to empower teachers to be aware of their knowledge and biases on inclusive education and the importance of their work in the success of school inclusion programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2022.10.06.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2022.10.06.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:成功的包容性教育有力地代表了社会的发展,促进了残疾学生更好的生活条件。目的:本研究探讨有此领域经验的普通教育教师对包容性教育与残疾知识的心理表征。方法:首先,参与者通过自然语义网络技术进行概念定义任务。教师定义了与全纳教育认知图式相关的十个目标概念。他们有60秒的时间来定义每个目标,使用动词、形容词、名词和代词,然后对定义者概念化目标的质量进行评分。随后,作者实现了一个约束满足神经网络来模拟学校包容模式的行为,并使用第一项研究的数据进行了时间计量认知分析。结果:参与者从四个维度(定义、参与者素质、利益相关者和包容性项目效果)组织了教育包容性含义。然而,在教育包容模式中出现了一些关于学校整合和传统教育的概念。此外,计算机模拟显示,参与者似乎对包容性行为有一个内部控制点。一般来说,残疾学生的经历有助于形成有利的教育包容模式。然而,尽管本研究的参与者有包容性项目的经验,但他们仍在构建包容性教育模式。结论:认知评估提供了有用的信息,使教师能够意识到他们在包容性教育方面的知识和偏见,以及他们的工作对学校包容性计划成功的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive Meaning of Inclusive Education of Students with Disability in Regular Education Teachers
Background: Successful inclusive education strongly represents the development of society, promoting better living conditions for students with disabilities. Objective: This study explored the mental representation of knowledge of inclusive education and disability held by regular education teachers with experience in this field. Methods: First, participants performed a conceptual definition task through the Natural Semantic Networks technique. Teachers defined ten target concepts related to the cognitive schema of inclusive education. They had 60 seconds to define each target, using verbs, adjectives, nouns, and pronouns, after rating the definers’ quality to conceptualize the target. Subsequently, the authors implemented a constraint satisfaction neural network to simulate the school inclusion schema's behavior and carried out a chronometric cognitive analysis using data from the first study. Results: Participants organized the educative inclusion meaning on four dimensions (definition, actors' qualities, stakeholders, and inclusion program effects). However, some concepts about school integration and conventional education appeared in the educative inclusion schema. Further, computer simulations showed that participants seem to have an internal locus of control over inclusive actions. Generally, experience with students with disabilities promotes the formation of a favorable educational inclusion schema. However, even though participants in this study have experience in inclusion programs, they are still constructing the inclusive education schema. Conclusion: The cognitive evaluation provides useful information to empower teachers to be aware of their knowledge and biases on inclusive education and the importance of their work in the success of school inclusion programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment
Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The journal aims to describe the research work on Intellectual Disability Diagnosis and Treatment in children and adults. It covers not just the technical aspects of the procedures in prenatal, newborn and postnatal screening, but also the impact which the process of testing and treatment has on individuals, parents, families and public-health in general. The journal seeks to publish, but is a not restricted to, Genetic Intellectual Disability Syndromes, using a range of approaches from medicine, psychiatry, psychology, pharmacy, biology, epidemiology, bioinformatics, biopharmaceutical to association and population studies as well as sociological, ethical, philosophical, legal and quality control issues with the ultimate goal of advancing the knowledge on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of the Intellectual Disabilities. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports and short communications(Letter article).
期刊最新文献
Special Education Teachers' Perceptions of Using Artificial Intelligence in Educating Students with Disabilities Directions and Practices for Implementing Early Care for Children with Developmental Disabilities in Ukrainian and Swedish ECEC System The Inner World and Formation of the Paranoid Personality Type in Persons with Intellectual Disabilities Perception and Acceptability of Regular Education Teachers Towards Inclusion of Children with Intellectual Disability in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria Extreme Psycho-Emotional Stress for Kharkivites Caused by Russia-Aggressor Bombardments: Ways to Overcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1