解开紧急情况下互助在线协作工具的功能:来自COVID-19封锁的见解

IF 2.5 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1145/3593056
Xiao Zeng, David Ji, D. Thadani, Boying Li, Xiaodie Pu, Zhao Cai, Patrick Y. K. Chau
{"title":"解开紧急情况下互助在线协作工具的功能:来自COVID-19封锁的见解","authors":"Xiao Zeng, David Ji, D. Thadani, Boying Li, Xiaodie Pu, Zhao Cai, Patrick Y. K. Chau","doi":"10.1145/3593056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the uncertain trajectory of COVID-19 conditions worldwide, there lies the potential for emergencies to arise, abruptly yielding mass social and economic disruption. Gaining insight into how digital technologies may be leveraged for effective emergency response is therefore pertinent. Emergency-induced needs may prompt citizens to organize mutual aid initiatives where people give what they can and get what they need in response. An increasingly prominent technology used for emergency response, online collaboration tools (OCTs), enables the appropriate match between the supply of aid and its relevant demand in mutual aid initiatives by mediating information and interactions between participants. Through analysis of mutual aid cases during the 2022 Shanghai COVID-19 lockdown, this study elucidates the benefits OCTs provide through the lens of affordance theory and identifies five key affordances of OCTs for emergency mutual aid: persistent accessibility, iterative modifiability, structured consolidation and retrieval, multisynchronous participation, and multichannel broadcasting. We illustrate how such affordances are actualized and how their enabling features work across information flow processes, specifically highlighting benefits of software minimalism with implications for practitioners and future software design in emergency situations. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on OCTs and affordances by disentangling its role in emergency responses.","PeriodicalId":45274,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling Affordances of Online Collaboration Tools for Mutual Aid in Emergencies: Insights from the COVID-19 Lockdown\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Zeng, David Ji, D. Thadani, Boying Li, Xiaodie Pu, Zhao Cai, Patrick Y. K. Chau\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3593056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the uncertain trajectory of COVID-19 conditions worldwide, there lies the potential for emergencies to arise, abruptly yielding mass social and economic disruption. Gaining insight into how digital technologies may be leveraged for effective emergency response is therefore pertinent. Emergency-induced needs may prompt citizens to organize mutual aid initiatives where people give what they can and get what they need in response. An increasingly prominent technology used for emergency response, online collaboration tools (OCTs), enables the appropriate match between the supply of aid and its relevant demand in mutual aid initiatives by mediating information and interactions between participants. Through analysis of mutual aid cases during the 2022 Shanghai COVID-19 lockdown, this study elucidates the benefits OCTs provide through the lens of affordance theory and identifies five key affordances of OCTs for emergency mutual aid: persistent accessibility, iterative modifiability, structured consolidation and retrieval, multisynchronous participation, and multichannel broadcasting. We illustrate how such affordances are actualized and how their enabling features work across information flow processes, specifically highlighting benefits of software minimalism with implications for practitioners and future software design in emergency situations. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on OCTs and affordances by disentangling its role in emergency responses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3593056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3593056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于COVID-19在世界范围内的发展轨迹不确定,有可能出现紧急情况,突然造成大规模的社会和经济混乱。因此,深入了解如何利用数字技术进行有效的应急反应是有意义的。紧急情况引起的需求可能促使公民组织互助行动,人们尽其所能,得到他们所需要的作为回应。用于应急反应的一项日益突出的技术是在线协作工具(oct),它通过协调参与者之间的信息和互动,使援助供应与其相关需求在互助倡议中得到适当匹配。本研究通过对2022年上海疫情封锁期间的互助案例分析,从功能可及性理论的角度阐述了应急互助的功能可及性,确定了应急互助的功能可及性主要有五个方面:持续可及性、迭代可修改性、结构化整合与检索性、多同步参与性和多通道广播性。我们说明了这些功能是如何实现的,以及它们的支持功能是如何跨信息流过程工作的,特别强调了软件极简主义的好处,以及在紧急情况下对从业者和未来软件设计的影响。本研究通过理清oct在应急响应中的作用,为oct及其能力提供了知识体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disentangling Affordances of Online Collaboration Tools for Mutual Aid in Emergencies: Insights from the COVID-19 Lockdown
With the uncertain trajectory of COVID-19 conditions worldwide, there lies the potential for emergencies to arise, abruptly yielding mass social and economic disruption. Gaining insight into how digital technologies may be leveraged for effective emergency response is therefore pertinent. Emergency-induced needs may prompt citizens to organize mutual aid initiatives where people give what they can and get what they need in response. An increasingly prominent technology used for emergency response, online collaboration tools (OCTs), enables the appropriate match between the supply of aid and its relevant demand in mutual aid initiatives by mediating information and interactions between participants. Through analysis of mutual aid cases during the 2022 Shanghai COVID-19 lockdown, this study elucidates the benefits OCTs provide through the lens of affordance theory and identifies five key affordances of OCTs for emergency mutual aid: persistent accessibility, iterative modifiability, structured consolidation and retrieval, multisynchronous participation, and multichannel broadcasting. We illustrate how such affordances are actualized and how their enabling features work across information flow processes, specifically highlighting benefits of software minimalism with implications for practitioners and future software design in emergency situations. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on OCTs and affordances by disentangling its role in emergency responses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
From Dissonance to Dialogue: A Token-Based Approach to Bridge the Gap Between Manufacturers and Customers A Process Mining Method for Inter-organizational Business Process Integration Introduction to the Special Issue on IT-enabled Business Management and Decision Making in the (Post) Covid-19 Era Non-Monotonic Generation of Knowledge Paths for Context Understanding How Should Enterprises Quantify and Analyze (Multi-Party) APT Cyber-Risk Exposure in their Industrial IoT Network?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1