精英中的精英:对数字化关键驱动因素的政策制定的调查

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Transforming Government- People Process and Policy Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1108/tg-06-2023-0082
Marcus Heidlund
{"title":"精英中的精英:对数字化关键驱动因素的政策制定的调查","authors":"Marcus Heidlund","doi":"10.1108/tg-06-2023-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore whether the key drivers identified in digitalization policies are being prioritized by practitioners in health and social care and to what degree the goals of the policies are being enacted.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe investigation comprised two stages. First, the key drivers of digitalization in the national policies were identified. Second, a survey was disseminated to practitioners within health and social care, asking them to indicate their stance on each key driver (using Likert scales).\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings of this paper are twofold. First, they demonstrate that practitioners more readily enact the key drivers centered around their everyday operations, such as improving services and care and increasing efficiency. Second, it shows that key drivers of a more rhetorical nature, such as “becoming the best,” do not yield benefits for practitioners.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper shows that for policies to have an effect in practice and to contribute to change, they should be rooted in key drivers centered around practitioners’ everyday operations, promoting specificity over abstraction.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWhile previous studies have involved policy analysis, few studies investigate the enactment of policies, how they are implemented and whether they contribute to changes in practice.\n","PeriodicalId":51696,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best of the best: an investigation of policy enactment for key drivers of digitalization\",\"authors\":\"Marcus Heidlund\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/tg-06-2023-0082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to explore whether the key drivers identified in digitalization policies are being prioritized by practitioners in health and social care and to what degree the goals of the policies are being enacted.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe investigation comprised two stages. First, the key drivers of digitalization in the national policies were identified. Second, a survey was disseminated to practitioners within health and social care, asking them to indicate their stance on each key driver (using Likert scales).\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings of this paper are twofold. First, they demonstrate that practitioners more readily enact the key drivers centered around their everyday operations, such as improving services and care and increasing efficiency. Second, it shows that key drivers of a more rhetorical nature, such as “becoming the best,” do not yield benefits for practitioners.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis paper shows that for policies to have an effect in practice and to contribute to change, they should be rooted in key drivers centered around practitioners’ everyday operations, promoting specificity over abstraction.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nWhile previous studies have involved policy analysis, few studies investigate the enactment of policies, how they are implemented and whether they contribute to changes in practice.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-06-2023-0082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-06-2023-0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本文旨在探讨数字化政策中确定的关键驱动因素是否被卫生和社会保健从业人员优先考虑,以及政策目标的制定程度。设计/方法/方法调查包括两个阶段。首先,确定了国家政策中数字化的关键驱动因素。第二,向卫生和社会保健领域的从业人员分发了一项调查,要求他们表明他们对每个关键驱动因素的立场(使用李克特量表)。这篇论文的发现是双重的。首先,他们证明了从业人员更容易制定以日常操作为中心的关键驱动因素,例如改善服务和护理以及提高效率。其次,它显示了更多修辞性质的关键驱动因素,例如“成为最好的”,不会给从业者带来好处。本文表明,要使政策在实践中产生效果并有助于变革,它们应该植根于以实践者日常操作为中心的关键驱动因素,促进具体而不是抽象。原创性/价值虽然以前的研究涉及政策分析,但很少有研究调查政策的制定、如何实施以及它们是否有助于实践中的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Best of the best: an investigation of policy enactment for key drivers of digitalization
Purpose This paper aims to explore whether the key drivers identified in digitalization policies are being prioritized by practitioners in health and social care and to what degree the goals of the policies are being enacted. Design/methodology/approach The investigation comprised two stages. First, the key drivers of digitalization in the national policies were identified. Second, a survey was disseminated to practitioners within health and social care, asking them to indicate their stance on each key driver (using Likert scales). Findings The findings of this paper are twofold. First, they demonstrate that practitioners more readily enact the key drivers centered around their everyday operations, such as improving services and care and increasing efficiency. Second, it shows that key drivers of a more rhetorical nature, such as “becoming the best,” do not yield benefits for practitioners. Practical implications This paper shows that for policies to have an effect in practice and to contribute to change, they should be rooted in key drivers centered around practitioners’ everyday operations, promoting specificity over abstraction. Originality/value While previous studies have involved policy analysis, few studies investigate the enactment of policies, how they are implemented and whether they contribute to changes in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Flawed charts in pension fund popular reports Public trust and collaborative e-governance performance: a study on government institutions and services Automation in public sector jobs and services: a framework to analyze public digital transformation’s impact in a data-constrained environment Digital inclusion for all? A gender-disaggregated analysis of e-government service use in Indonesia Measuring the effects of electronic government services and corrupt practices on information exchange: a comparison of public and private hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1