村务署(BUMDES)精英捕获现象

Syah Firdaus
{"title":"村务署(BUMDES)精英捕获现象","authors":"Syah Firdaus","doi":"10.14710/POLITIKA.9.2.2018.20-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTVillage independence is one of the main focuses to achieve the welfare ofrural communities. One of the implications of the village independence agenda is thepresence of BUMDes as a rural institution to perform the function of empoweringand improving the welfare of the community. However, the presence of BUMDes canlead to new problems: the emergence of an elite presence dominates BUMDes. Oneof the phenomena that can happen is Elite Capture. Elite capture is an elite hijackingof management spaces for personal or group interests.The object of this research is BUMDes Argosari located in Pulosari Village,Pemalang Regency. This study focuses on investigating elite capture phenomena bylooking at the strategy of empowering elite power by using John Gaventa's powercube theory in hijacking the management of BUMDes at each stage of itsmanagement. Stages of management are divided into four stages of agenda setting,implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. Each stage is analyzed by the elitehijacking actions so that later will get a comprehensive picture of capturing behaviorconducted by the elite. This research uses qualitative method with case studyapproachVillage Head and Chairman of BPD are two powerful actors who are veryinfluential in the management of Argosari BUMDes. Both actors are often contestedin the context of BUMDes management. However, during the process of running thevillage management is a very dominant actors that often plow each stage ofmanagement BUMDes. Some of the factors that make the village strong enoughposition in internal BUMDes is a very strong relationship with outside parties, boththe private and supradesa government. In addition, village heads are also able to buildhigh compliance against the internal ranks of BUMDes so that internal BUMDes isvery dependent on the figure of village head. While the Chairman of BPD, onlyoptimal in the realm of supervision only. The role and power possessed by the headof BPD is not enough to offset the power of the village head in the management ofBUMDes. Chairman of the BPD to fight in the form of reprimands either verbally orin writing to the internal BUMDes and Kades as advisor BUMDes and establishrelationships with groups that also cons with the leadership of villageKeywords: Elite Power, Elite Capture, BUMDes Management","PeriodicalId":32705,"journal":{"name":"Politika Jurnal Ilmu Politik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14710/POLITIKA.9.2.2018.20-37","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FENOMENA ELITE CAPTURE DALAM PENGELOLAAN BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA (BUMDES)\",\"authors\":\"Syah Firdaus\",\"doi\":\"10.14710/POLITIKA.9.2.2018.20-37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTVillage independence is one of the main focuses to achieve the welfare ofrural communities. One of the implications of the village independence agenda is thepresence of BUMDes as a rural institution to perform the function of empoweringand improving the welfare of the community. However, the presence of BUMDes canlead to new problems: the emergence of an elite presence dominates BUMDes. Oneof the phenomena that can happen is Elite Capture. Elite capture is an elite hijackingof management spaces for personal or group interests.The object of this research is BUMDes Argosari located in Pulosari Village,Pemalang Regency. This study focuses on investigating elite capture phenomena bylooking at the strategy of empowering elite power by using John Gaventa's powercube theory in hijacking the management of BUMDes at each stage of itsmanagement. Stages of management are divided into four stages of agenda setting,implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. Each stage is analyzed by the elitehijacking actions so that later will get a comprehensive picture of capturing behaviorconducted by the elite. This research uses qualitative method with case studyapproachVillage Head and Chairman of BPD are two powerful actors who are veryinfluential in the management of Argosari BUMDes. Both actors are often contestedin the context of BUMDes management. However, during the process of running thevillage management is a very dominant actors that often plow each stage ofmanagement BUMDes. Some of the factors that make the village strong enoughposition in internal BUMDes is a very strong relationship with outside parties, boththe private and supradesa government. In addition, village heads are also able to buildhigh compliance against the internal ranks of BUMDes so that internal BUMDes isvery dependent on the figure of village head. While the Chairman of BPD, onlyoptimal in the realm of supervision only. The role and power possessed by the headof BPD is not enough to offset the power of the village head in the management ofBUMDes. Chairman of the BPD to fight in the form of reprimands either verbally orin writing to the internal BUMDes and Kades as advisor BUMDes and establishrelationships with groups that also cons with the leadership of villageKeywords: Elite Power, Elite Capture, BUMDes Management\",\"PeriodicalId\":32705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politika Jurnal Ilmu Politik\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14710/POLITIKA.9.2.2018.20-37\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politika Jurnal Ilmu Politik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14710/POLITIKA.9.2.2018.20-37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politika Jurnal Ilmu Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/POLITIKA.9.2.2018.20-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

摘要乡村独立是实现农村社区福利的主要着力点之一。村庄独立议程的含义之一是,BUMDes作为一个农村机构的存在,履行着促进和改善社区福利的职能。然而,BUMD的存在可能会导致新的问题:精英的出现主导着BUMD。精英捕获是可能发生的现象之一。精英劫持是指精英为了个人或团体利益劫持管理空间。本研究的对象是位于Pemalang Regency Pulosari村的BUMDes Argosari。本研究的重点是利用约翰·加文塔的权力立方体理论,在劫持BUMDes管理的各个阶段,通过观察赋予精英权力的策略,来调查精英捕获现象。管理阶段分为议程制定、实施、监测和评估四个阶段。每个阶段都通过elitehijacking动作进行分析,以便稍后能够全面了解精英的捕捉行为。本研究采用定性方法,结合案例研究方法。村长和BPD主席是两位在Argosari BUMDes管理中非常有影响力的强有力的参与者。在BUMD管理的背景下,这两个角色经常受到争议。然而,在经营过程中,村级管理是一个非常占主导地位的行动者,他们往往在管理的各个阶段耕耘BUMD。使村庄在内部BUMD中占据足够强大地位的一些因素是与外部政党的密切关系,包括私营和超政府。此外,村长还能够建立与BUMD内部级别的高度合规性,因此内部BUMD非常依赖村长的数字。而作为BPD的主席,只有在监督领域才是最佳人选。BPD负责人的角色和权力不足以抵消村长在UMDes管理中的权力。BPD主席以口头或书面形式向内部BUMDes和Kades作为BUMDes顾问进行斗争,并与同样与村庄领导层相悖的团体建立关系关键词:精英力量、精英捕获、BUMDes管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FENOMENA ELITE CAPTURE DALAM PENGELOLAAN BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA (BUMDES)
ABSTRACTVillage independence is one of the main focuses to achieve the welfare ofrural communities. One of the implications of the village independence agenda is thepresence of BUMDes as a rural institution to perform the function of empoweringand improving the welfare of the community. However, the presence of BUMDes canlead to new problems: the emergence of an elite presence dominates BUMDes. Oneof the phenomena that can happen is Elite Capture. Elite capture is an elite hijackingof management spaces for personal or group interests.The object of this research is BUMDes Argosari located in Pulosari Village,Pemalang Regency. This study focuses on investigating elite capture phenomena bylooking at the strategy of empowering elite power by using John Gaventa's powercube theory in hijacking the management of BUMDes at each stage of itsmanagement. Stages of management are divided into four stages of agenda setting,implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. Each stage is analyzed by the elitehijacking actions so that later will get a comprehensive picture of capturing behaviorconducted by the elite. This research uses qualitative method with case studyapproachVillage Head and Chairman of BPD are two powerful actors who are veryinfluential in the management of Argosari BUMDes. Both actors are often contestedin the context of BUMDes management. However, during the process of running thevillage management is a very dominant actors that often plow each stage ofmanagement BUMDes. Some of the factors that make the village strong enoughposition in internal BUMDes is a very strong relationship with outside parties, boththe private and supradesa government. In addition, village heads are also able to buildhigh compliance against the internal ranks of BUMDes so that internal BUMDes isvery dependent on the figure of village head. While the Chairman of BPD, onlyoptimal in the realm of supervision only. The role and power possessed by the headof BPD is not enough to offset the power of the village head in the management ofBUMDes. Chairman of the BPD to fight in the form of reprimands either verbally orin writing to the internal BUMDes and Kades as advisor BUMDes and establishrelationships with groups that also cons with the leadership of villageKeywords: Elite Power, Elite Capture, BUMDes Management
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Negara, Gerakan Islam Pasca-Fundamentalis dan Masa Depan Demokrasi di Indonesia: Kekuasaan Simbolik dan Upaya Konsolidasi Nationalist-Islamist Party in a Liberal Ecosystem: The Solidity and Campaign Strategy of the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) during the 2014 and 2019 Elections Voter Behaviour and The Campaign Pattern of Candidates during Pandemics in Regional Head Election in Medan City, North Sumatra Delegitimisation of Indonesian Traditional Leaders: An Analysis in Minangkabau, West Sumatra Province Jokowi’s Sneakers Politics: Personal Branding, Politics of Imaging and Millenial Votes The 2019 Presidential Election
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1