Karl V. Healy, Solveig Weise, A. Fink, T. Frese, M. Richter, Anja Knöchelmann
{"title":"以学习方法了解2型糖尿病自我管理训练的困难与机会:两项德国教育课程的质性内容分析","authors":"Karl V. Healy, Solveig Weise, A. Fink, T. Frese, M. Richter, Anja Knöchelmann","doi":"10.1080/19325037.2022.2120580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Diabetes self-management education (DSME) improves disease-specific markers (HbA1c levels and bodyweight) and prevents disease-related complications. Yet, patients do not seem to benefit equally from such education, likely because of differences in approaches to learning. Purpose We investigated which learning approaches are best addressed by diabetes curricula and suggest improvements in curriculum design. Methods Two of the most popular German type 2 DSME curricula were studied. We used qualitative content analysis to build a systematic coding frame, extracting and connecting categories of meaning from the material. Criteria for categories were drawn from research on learning preferences in adult Germans. Results Both curricula mainly address participants preferring educator-guided and application-driven learning. One of the curricula more actively involves its participants with open discussions and personal goal-setting and shows a stronger emphasis on social support strategies. Discussion Different learning approaches are not met equally in the curricula, which might create unique difficulties for participants of DSME. Translation to Health Education Practice Introducing personal goal-setting and progress monitoring in DSME should benefit participants with passive approaches to learning. Offering additional course material could diversify teaching methods and satisfy theoretically driven people. All DSME programs should emphasize social support strategies. A AJHE Self-Study quiz is online for this article via the SHAPE America Online Institute (SAOI) http://portal.shapeamerica.org/trn-Webinars","PeriodicalId":46846,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Education","volume":"53 1","pages":"370 - 380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Approaches as a Means to Understand Difficulties and Opportunities in Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Training: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Two German Educational Curricula\",\"authors\":\"Karl V. Healy, Solveig Weise, A. Fink, T. Frese, M. Richter, Anja Knöchelmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19325037.2022.2120580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background Diabetes self-management education (DSME) improves disease-specific markers (HbA1c levels and bodyweight) and prevents disease-related complications. Yet, patients do not seem to benefit equally from such education, likely because of differences in approaches to learning. Purpose We investigated which learning approaches are best addressed by diabetes curricula and suggest improvements in curriculum design. Methods Two of the most popular German type 2 DSME curricula were studied. We used qualitative content analysis to build a systematic coding frame, extracting and connecting categories of meaning from the material. Criteria for categories were drawn from research on learning preferences in adult Germans. Results Both curricula mainly address participants preferring educator-guided and application-driven learning. One of the curricula more actively involves its participants with open discussions and personal goal-setting and shows a stronger emphasis on social support strategies. Discussion Different learning approaches are not met equally in the curricula, which might create unique difficulties for participants of DSME. Translation to Health Education Practice Introducing personal goal-setting and progress monitoring in DSME should benefit participants with passive approaches to learning. Offering additional course material could diversify teaching methods and satisfy theoretically driven people. All DSME programs should emphasize social support strategies. A AJHE Self-Study quiz is online for this article via the SHAPE America Online Institute (SAOI) http://portal.shapeamerica.org/trn-Webinars\",\"PeriodicalId\":46846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Education\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"370 - 380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2022.2120580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2022.2120580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Learning Approaches as a Means to Understand Difficulties and Opportunities in Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Training: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Two German Educational Curricula
ABSTRACT Background Diabetes self-management education (DSME) improves disease-specific markers (HbA1c levels and bodyweight) and prevents disease-related complications. Yet, patients do not seem to benefit equally from such education, likely because of differences in approaches to learning. Purpose We investigated which learning approaches are best addressed by diabetes curricula and suggest improvements in curriculum design. Methods Two of the most popular German type 2 DSME curricula were studied. We used qualitative content analysis to build a systematic coding frame, extracting and connecting categories of meaning from the material. Criteria for categories were drawn from research on learning preferences in adult Germans. Results Both curricula mainly address participants preferring educator-guided and application-driven learning. One of the curricula more actively involves its participants with open discussions and personal goal-setting and shows a stronger emphasis on social support strategies. Discussion Different learning approaches are not met equally in the curricula, which might create unique difficulties for participants of DSME. Translation to Health Education Practice Introducing personal goal-setting and progress monitoring in DSME should benefit participants with passive approaches to learning. Offering additional course material could diversify teaching methods and satisfy theoretically driven people. All DSME programs should emphasize social support strategies. A AJHE Self-Study quiz is online for this article via the SHAPE America Online Institute (SAOI) http://portal.shapeamerica.org/trn-Webinars
期刊介绍:
AJHE is sponsored by the American Association for Health Education of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. The mission of the American Association for Health Education(AAHE) is to advance the profession by serving health educators and others who strive to promote the health of all people through education and other systematic strategies.AAHE addresses the following priorities •Develop and promulgate standards, resources and services regarding health education to professionals and non-professionals •Foster the development of national research priorities in health education and promotion. Provide mechanisms for the translation and interaction between theory, research and practice.