{"title":"瓶颈长度和位置对模拟行人出口的影响","authors":"D. Parisi, G. Patterson","doi":"10.4279/PIP.090001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the problem of pedestrian egress under different geometries is studied by means of two numerical models. The length of the bottleneck after the exit and the distance of the exit to the lateral wall of a squared room are investigated. Both models show that an increase in the bottleneck length increases the evacuation time by more than 20 %, for any exit position. Hence, a bottleneck length tending to zero is the best choice. On the contrary, the results of moving the exit closer to the lateral wall are different in both models and, thus, its convenience cannot be stated. To unveil whether this layout modification is favorable, experimental data are required. Moreover, the discrepancy between models indicates that they should be validated considering several scenarios. Received: 25 August 2016, Accepted: 3 January 2017; Edited by: G. C. Barker; Reviewed by: A. Seyfried, Institute for Advanced Simulation Julich Supercomputing Centre, Germany; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4279/PIP.090001 Cite as: D R Parisi, G A Patterson, Papers in Physics 9, 090001 (2017) This paper, by D R Parisi, G A Patterson , is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 .","PeriodicalId":19791,"journal":{"name":"Papers in Physics","volume":"9 1","pages":"090001-090001"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of bottleneck lengths and position on simulated pedestrian egress\",\"authors\":\"D. Parisi, G. Patterson\",\"doi\":\"10.4279/PIP.090001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the problem of pedestrian egress under different geometries is studied by means of two numerical models. The length of the bottleneck after the exit and the distance of the exit to the lateral wall of a squared room are investigated. Both models show that an increase in the bottleneck length increases the evacuation time by more than 20 %, for any exit position. Hence, a bottleneck length tending to zero is the best choice. On the contrary, the results of moving the exit closer to the lateral wall are different in both models and, thus, its convenience cannot be stated. To unveil whether this layout modification is favorable, experimental data are required. Moreover, the discrepancy between models indicates that they should be validated considering several scenarios. Received: 25 August 2016, Accepted: 3 January 2017; Edited by: G. C. Barker; Reviewed by: A. Seyfried, Institute for Advanced Simulation Julich Supercomputing Centre, Germany; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4279/PIP.090001 Cite as: D R Parisi, G A Patterson, Papers in Physics 9, 090001 (2017) This paper, by D R Parisi, G A Patterson , is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":19791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Papers in Physics\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"090001-090001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Papers in Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4279/PIP.090001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers in Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4279/PIP.090001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
摘要
本文通过两个数值模型研究了不同几何形状下的行人出口问题。研究了方形房间出口后瓶颈的长度和出口到侧壁的距离。两个模型都表明,对于任何出口位置,瓶颈长度的增加都会使疏散时间增加20%以上。因此,趋向于零的瓶颈长度是最佳选择。相反,在两种模型中,将出口移近侧壁的结果不同,因此无法说明其便利性。为了揭示这种布局修改是否有利,需要实验数据。此外,模型之间的差异表明,应考虑几种情况对其进行验证。接收日期:2016年8月25日,接受日期:2017年1月3日;编辑:G.C.Barker;审核人:A.Seyfried,德国Julich超级计算中心高级模拟研究所;DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4279/PIP.090001引用自:D R Parisi,G A Patterson,《物理学论文》9,090001(2017)本文由D R Paris,G A帕特森撰写,根据知识共享归因许可证3.0获得许可。
Influence of bottleneck lengths and position on simulated pedestrian egress
In this paper, the problem of pedestrian egress under different geometries is studied by means of two numerical models. The length of the bottleneck after the exit and the distance of the exit to the lateral wall of a squared room are investigated. Both models show that an increase in the bottleneck length increases the evacuation time by more than 20 %, for any exit position. Hence, a bottleneck length tending to zero is the best choice. On the contrary, the results of moving the exit closer to the lateral wall are different in both models and, thus, its convenience cannot be stated. To unveil whether this layout modification is favorable, experimental data are required. Moreover, the discrepancy between models indicates that they should be validated considering several scenarios. Received: 25 August 2016, Accepted: 3 January 2017; Edited by: G. C. Barker; Reviewed by: A. Seyfried, Institute for Advanced Simulation Julich Supercomputing Centre, Germany; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4279/PIP.090001 Cite as: D R Parisi, G A Patterson, Papers in Physics 9, 090001 (2017) This paper, by D R Parisi, G A Patterson , is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 .
期刊介绍:
Papers in Physics publishes original research in all areas of physics and its interface with other subjects. The scope includes, but is not limited to, physics of particles and fields, condensed matter, relativity and gravitation, nuclear physics, physics of fluids, biophysics, econophysics, chemical physics, statistical mechanics, soft condensed matter, materials science, mathematical physics and general physics. Contributions in the areas of foundations of physics, history of physics and physics education are not considered for publication. Articles published in Papers in Physics contain substantial new results and ideas that advance the state of physics in a non-trivial way. Articles are strictly reviewed by specialists prior to publication. Papers in Physics highlights outstanding articles published in the journal through the Editors'' choice section. Papers in Physics offers two distinct editorial treatments to articles from which authors can choose. In Traditional Review, manuscripts are submitted to anonymous reviewers seeking constructive criticism and editors make a decision on whether publication is appropriate. In Open Review, manuscripts are sent to reviewers. If the paper is considered original and technically sound, the article, the reviewer''s comments and the author''s reply are published alongside the names of all involved. This way, Papers in Physics promotes the open discussion of controversies among specialists that are of help to the reader and to the transparency of the editorial process. Moreover, our reviewers receive their due recognition by publishing a recorded citable report. Papers in Physics publishes Commentaries from the reviewer(s) if major disagreements remain after exchange with the authors or if a different insight proposed is considered valuable for the readers.