《对加拿大野生动物的征服:原则和政策的失败》,马克斯·弗兰著

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-18 DOI:10.5663/aps.v9i1.29384
A. Bennett
{"title":"《对加拿大野生动物的征服:原则和政策的失败》,马克斯·弗兰著","authors":"A. Bennett","doi":"10.5663/aps.v9i1.29384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Max Foran’s The Subjugation of Canadian Wildlife argues that wildlife management and, by association, conservation are implicated in discriminatory anthropocentric practices that diminish biodiversity, protected areas, and marine ecosystems and dominate wildlife. Foran links the humancentric speciesism associated with animal domination to Aristotelian and Stoic philosophy and early Christianity. From there, he outlines the historical contours of what he calls the “dominant belief system.” This belief system includes a combination of the indirect duties argument, which suggested that humans benefited from extending kindness to animals (Immanuel Kant 1724–1804), and utilitarianism (Jeremy Bentham 1784–1832), which advocated maximizing utility or causing the least pain. This belief system, Foran suggests, later evolved in the early nineteenth century to expand into what is now known as the “classic animal welfare” position. This position advocates pursuing an anti-cruelty policy for animals while maintaining their use to humans. According to Foran, this belief system has not evolved since. Instead, human exceptionalism and entitlement to animal exploitation based on underdeveloped linguistic and cognitive capacities are commonplace. The Subjugation of Wildlife offers a thorough assessment of the current status of wildlife management and conservation in Canada. Foran offers examples from each of the provinces and territories to illustrate the consistency of the dominant belief system that underlies wildlife policy in this country. In addition to individual species, he lists failures in habitat protection, climate change policy, and the subjective application of wildlife risk markers (e.g., “concern,” “at risk,” and “extinct”). The introduction provides readers with the philosophical underpinning and overarching argument for the remainder of the book. Here, Foran summarizes the significant human moral and ethical positions that support our contemporary utilitarian/humanist approach to wildlife conservation and management.","PeriodicalId":42043,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal Policy Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Subjugation of Canadian Wildlife: Failures of Principle and Policy by Max Foran\",\"authors\":\"A. Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.5663/aps.v9i1.29384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Max Foran’s The Subjugation of Canadian Wildlife argues that wildlife management and, by association, conservation are implicated in discriminatory anthropocentric practices that diminish biodiversity, protected areas, and marine ecosystems and dominate wildlife. Foran links the humancentric speciesism associated with animal domination to Aristotelian and Stoic philosophy and early Christianity. From there, he outlines the historical contours of what he calls the “dominant belief system.” This belief system includes a combination of the indirect duties argument, which suggested that humans benefited from extending kindness to animals (Immanuel Kant 1724–1804), and utilitarianism (Jeremy Bentham 1784–1832), which advocated maximizing utility or causing the least pain. This belief system, Foran suggests, later evolved in the early nineteenth century to expand into what is now known as the “classic animal welfare” position. This position advocates pursuing an anti-cruelty policy for animals while maintaining their use to humans. According to Foran, this belief system has not evolved since. Instead, human exceptionalism and entitlement to animal exploitation based on underdeveloped linguistic and cognitive capacities are commonplace. The Subjugation of Wildlife offers a thorough assessment of the current status of wildlife management and conservation in Canada. Foran offers examples from each of the provinces and territories to illustrate the consistency of the dominant belief system that underlies wildlife policy in this country. In addition to individual species, he lists failures in habitat protection, climate change policy, and the subjective application of wildlife risk markers (e.g., “concern,” “at risk,” and “extinct”). The introduction provides readers with the philosophical underpinning and overarching argument for the remainder of the book. Here, Foran summarizes the significant human moral and ethical positions that support our contemporary utilitarian/humanist approach to wildlife conservation and management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aboriginal Policy Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aboriginal Policy Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5663/aps.v9i1.29384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aboriginal Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5663/aps.v9i1.29384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Max Foran的《加拿大野生动物的征服》认为,野生动物的管理和保护与歧视性的人类中心主义做法有关,这种做法减少了生物多样性、保护区和海洋生态系统,并主宰了野生动物。Foran将与动物统治相关的以人类为中心的物种主义与亚里士多德、斯多葛派哲学和早期基督教联系起来。在此基础上,他勾勒出了他所谓的“主导信仰体系”的历史轮廓。这一信仰体系包括间接责任论证(Immanuel Kant, 1724-1804)和功利主义(Jeremy Bentham, 1784-1832)的结合,前者认为人类从善待动物中受益,后者主张将效用最大化或造成的痛苦最小化。福兰认为,这种信仰体系后来在19世纪初发展壮大,成为现在所知的“经典动物福利”立场。这一立场主张奉行反虐待动物的政策,同时保持对人类的利用。根据Foran的说法,这种信仰体系从那时起就没有发展过。相反,人类的例外论和基于不发达的语言和认知能力的动物剥削权利是司空见惯的。《野生动物的征服》对加拿大野生动物管理和保护的现状进行了全面的评估。Foran提供了来自每个省和地区的例子来说明这个国家野生动物政策背后的主导信仰体系的一致性。除了个别物种,他还列举了栖息地保护、气候变化政策和野生动物风险标记(如“关注”、“有风险”和“灭绝”)的主观应用方面的失败。引言为读者提供了本书其余部分的哲学基础和总体论点。在这里,Foran总结了重要的人类道德和伦理立场,这些立场支持我们当代功利主义/人道主义的野生动物保护和管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Subjugation of Canadian Wildlife: Failures of Principle and Policy by Max Foran
Max Foran’s The Subjugation of Canadian Wildlife argues that wildlife management and, by association, conservation are implicated in discriminatory anthropocentric practices that diminish biodiversity, protected areas, and marine ecosystems and dominate wildlife. Foran links the humancentric speciesism associated with animal domination to Aristotelian and Stoic philosophy and early Christianity. From there, he outlines the historical contours of what he calls the “dominant belief system.” This belief system includes a combination of the indirect duties argument, which suggested that humans benefited from extending kindness to animals (Immanuel Kant 1724–1804), and utilitarianism (Jeremy Bentham 1784–1832), which advocated maximizing utility or causing the least pain. This belief system, Foran suggests, later evolved in the early nineteenth century to expand into what is now known as the “classic animal welfare” position. This position advocates pursuing an anti-cruelty policy for animals while maintaining their use to humans. According to Foran, this belief system has not evolved since. Instead, human exceptionalism and entitlement to animal exploitation based on underdeveloped linguistic and cognitive capacities are commonplace. The Subjugation of Wildlife offers a thorough assessment of the current status of wildlife management and conservation in Canada. Foran offers examples from each of the provinces and territories to illustrate the consistency of the dominant belief system that underlies wildlife policy in this country. In addition to individual species, he lists failures in habitat protection, climate change policy, and the subjective application of wildlife risk markers (e.g., “concern,” “at risk,” and “extinct”). The introduction provides readers with the philosophical underpinning and overarching argument for the remainder of the book. Here, Foran summarizes the significant human moral and ethical positions that support our contemporary utilitarian/humanist approach to wildlife conservation and management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aboriginal Policy Studies
Aboriginal Policy Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Indigenous Identity Fraud: An Interview with Caroline Tait Analysis of Crime, Incarceration, Victimization and Employment of Indigenous Persons in Canada from 2015 to 2021 NAISA Council Statement on Indigenous Identity Fraud From Reconciliation to ‘Idle No More’: ‘Articulation’ and Indigenous Struggle in Canada Remaining Unreconciled: Philanthropy and Indigenous Governance in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1