亨利·弗劳尔先生与《尤利西斯》中历史对生命的利用

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1353/jjq.2023.a905374
M. Fogarty
{"title":"亨利·弗劳尔先生与《尤利西斯》中历史对生命的利用","authors":"M. Fogarty","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2023.a905374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This essay brings two under-discussed aspects of Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy, including his reflections on \"cultural paralysis\" and what he calls the \"suprahistorical approach,\" into a productive philosophical dialogue with a comparably under-discussed aspect of Ulysses, that is, the significance of the role performed by Leopold Bloom's alter ego, Henry Flower. I argue that Bloom creates this alter ego using a process that is reminiscent of Nietzsche's suprahistorical approach, which proposes that an individual, or a body politic, might benefit from selective historical remembrance, with a view to overcoming the paralyzing trauma triggered by the death of his infant son, Rudy. Mindful of the temporal vantage point from which Joyce reflects upon the fictionalized events of 16 June 1904, this essay further demonstrates that the creation of Henry Flower completes the kaleidoscopic mode of narration through which Joyce refracts the stifling legacy of Irish history: first through Stephen Dedalus, then through Leopold Bloom, and ultimately through Henry Flower. When viewed from this perspective, it becomes apparent that the creation of Henry Flower allows Bloom to recognize the restorative potential of a surrogate father-son relationship with Stephen. In this way, Henry Flower performs a conciliatory function that establishes a philosophical blueprint for postcolonial nation-building, thereby underscoring the productive potential that resides in even the most disconcerting depths of Nietzsche's philosophical vision.","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":"60 1","pages":"357 - 377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Henry Flower Esq. and the Uses of History for Life in Ulysses\",\"authors\":\"M. Fogarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jjq.2023.a905374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This essay brings two under-discussed aspects of Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy, including his reflections on \\\"cultural paralysis\\\" and what he calls the \\\"suprahistorical approach,\\\" into a productive philosophical dialogue with a comparably under-discussed aspect of Ulysses, that is, the significance of the role performed by Leopold Bloom's alter ego, Henry Flower. I argue that Bloom creates this alter ego using a process that is reminiscent of Nietzsche's suprahistorical approach, which proposes that an individual, or a body politic, might benefit from selective historical remembrance, with a view to overcoming the paralyzing trauma triggered by the death of his infant son, Rudy. Mindful of the temporal vantage point from which Joyce reflects upon the fictionalized events of 16 June 1904, this essay further demonstrates that the creation of Henry Flower completes the kaleidoscopic mode of narration through which Joyce refracts the stifling legacy of Irish history: first through Stephen Dedalus, then through Leopold Bloom, and ultimately through Henry Flower. When viewed from this perspective, it becomes apparent that the creation of Henry Flower allows Bloom to recognize the restorative potential of a surrogate father-son relationship with Stephen. In this way, Henry Flower performs a conciliatory function that establishes a philosophical blueprint for postcolonial nation-building, thereby underscoring the productive potential that resides in even the most disconcerting depths of Nietzsche's philosophical vision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"357 - 377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2023.a905374\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2023.a905374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文将弗里德里希·尼采哲学中两个未被充分讨论的方面,包括他对“文化麻痹”和他所说的“超历史方法”的反思,与《尤利西斯》中一个未被广泛讨论的方面进行了富有成效的哲学对话,即利奥波德·布鲁姆的另一个自我亨利·弗劳尔所扮演的角色的意义。我认为,布鲁姆创造这个另一个自我的过程让人想起尼采的超历史方法,该方法提出,个人或政治体可能会从选择性的历史记忆中受益,以克服其幼子鲁迪之死引发的瘫痪创伤。考虑到乔伊斯反思1904年6月16日虚构事件的时间优势,本文进一步证明,亨利·弗劳尔的创作完成了乔伊斯折射爱尔兰历史令人窒息的遗产的万花筒般的叙事模式:首先是通过斯蒂芬·德达勒斯,然后是利奥波德·布鲁姆,最后是通过亨利·弗劳尔。从这个角度来看,很明显,亨利·弗劳尔的创作让布鲁姆认识到了与斯蒂芬代孕父子关系的恢复潜力。通过这种方式,亨利·弗劳尔发挥了和解的作用,为后殖民国家建设建立了哲学蓝图,从而强调了即使是尼采哲学视野中最令人不安的深处也存在的生产潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Henry Flower Esq. and the Uses of History for Life in Ulysses
ABSTRACT:This essay brings two under-discussed aspects of Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy, including his reflections on "cultural paralysis" and what he calls the "suprahistorical approach," into a productive philosophical dialogue with a comparably under-discussed aspect of Ulysses, that is, the significance of the role performed by Leopold Bloom's alter ego, Henry Flower. I argue that Bloom creates this alter ego using a process that is reminiscent of Nietzsche's suprahistorical approach, which proposes that an individual, or a body politic, might benefit from selective historical remembrance, with a view to overcoming the paralyzing trauma triggered by the death of his infant son, Rudy. Mindful of the temporal vantage point from which Joyce reflects upon the fictionalized events of 16 June 1904, this essay further demonstrates that the creation of Henry Flower completes the kaleidoscopic mode of narration through which Joyce refracts the stifling legacy of Irish history: first through Stephen Dedalus, then through Leopold Bloom, and ultimately through Henry Flower. When viewed from this perspective, it becomes apparent that the creation of Henry Flower allows Bloom to recognize the restorative potential of a surrogate father-son relationship with Stephen. In this way, Henry Flower performs a conciliatory function that establishes a philosophical blueprint for postcolonial nation-building, thereby underscoring the productive potential that resides in even the most disconcerting depths of Nietzsche's philosophical vision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963 at the University of Tulsa by Thomas F. Staley, the James Joyce Quarterly has been the flagship journal of international Joyce studies ever since. In each issue, the JJQ brings together a wide array of critical and theoretical work focusing on the life, writing, and reception of James Joyce. We encourage submissions of all types, welcoming archival, historical, biographical, and critical research. Each issue of the JJQ provides a selection of peer-reviewed essays representing the very best in contemporary Joyce scholarship. In addition, the journal publishes notes, reviews, letters, a comprehensive checklist of recent Joyce-related publications, and the editor"s "Raising the Wind" comments.
期刊最新文献
Calling Forth the Future: Joyce and the Messianism of Absence Ulysses "seen" Introducing Robert Berry's "Aeolus" A Cold Case of Irish Facts: Re(:)visiting John Stanislaus Joyce Stepping Through Origins: Nature, Home, & Landscape in Irish Literature by Jefferson Holdridge (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1