定义IFRS应用的公允价值概念

IF 1.9 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Intelligenza Artificiale Pub Date : 2021-05-14 DOI:10.24891/IA.24.5.575
M. Gorodilov, Anna A. Radevich
{"title":"定义IFRS应用的公允价值概念","authors":"M. Gorodilov, Anna A. Radevich","doi":"10.24891/IA.24.5.575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subject. This article discusses the issue of defining the Fair Value concept, its similarity and identification with the concept of Market Value. It examines the specifics of each particular value, defines the concept of Fair Value, and analyzes approaches (methods) of fair value valuation, clarifies existing problems of determining fair value for the purposes of IFRS application.\nObjectives. The article aims to define the notion of Fair Value and appropriate use in accounting, as well as explore approaches to assess fair value.\nMethods. For the study, we used a comparative analysis.\nResults. The article says of many inconsistencies in the valuation of fair value, starting with the lack of a clear definition of fair value in IFRS, which is actually identified with the concept of market value. It proposes a refined definition of fair value and identifies fundamental differences between fair and market values, which are based on the procedures used in their assessment.\nConclusions. Fair and market values are two different types of valuation. Fair value can be the same as market value, but only if there is an active market available. There is no single concept of Fair Value presented in scientific and special literature. The same approaches are used in fair (IFRS) and market (valuation standards) assessments, but the methods described for each approach are not always the same.","PeriodicalId":42055,"journal":{"name":"Intelligenza Artificiale","volume":"22 1","pages":"575-591"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining the Fair Value concept for IFRS application\",\"authors\":\"M. Gorodilov, Anna A. Radevich\",\"doi\":\"10.24891/IA.24.5.575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Subject. This article discusses the issue of defining the Fair Value concept, its similarity and identification with the concept of Market Value. It examines the specifics of each particular value, defines the concept of Fair Value, and analyzes approaches (methods) of fair value valuation, clarifies existing problems of determining fair value for the purposes of IFRS application.\\nObjectives. The article aims to define the notion of Fair Value and appropriate use in accounting, as well as explore approaches to assess fair value.\\nMethods. For the study, we used a comparative analysis.\\nResults. The article says of many inconsistencies in the valuation of fair value, starting with the lack of a clear definition of fair value in IFRS, which is actually identified with the concept of market value. It proposes a refined definition of fair value and identifies fundamental differences between fair and market values, which are based on the procedures used in their assessment.\\nConclusions. Fair and market values are two different types of valuation. Fair value can be the same as market value, but only if there is an active market available. There is no single concept of Fair Value presented in scientific and special literature. The same approaches are used in fair (IFRS) and market (valuation standards) assessments, but the methods described for each approach are not always the same.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligenza Artificiale\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"575-591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligenza Artificiale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24891/IA.24.5.575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligenza Artificiale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24891/IA.24.5.575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

主题本文讨论了公允价值概念的界定问题,以及公允价值概念与市场价值概念的相似性和一致性。它审查了每个特定价值的具体情况,定义了公允价值的概念,分析了公允价值估值的方法,澄清了为适用《国际财务报告准则》而确定公允价值的现有问题。目标。本文旨在界定公允价值的概念及其在会计中的适当应用,并探讨公允价值的评估方法。方法。在这项研究中,我们使用了比较分析。后果这篇文章谈到了公允价值估值中的许多不一致之处,首先是《国际财务报告准则》中缺乏对公允价值的明确定义,而公允价值实际上与市场价值的概念相一致。它提出了公允价值的精细定义,并确定了公允价值和市场价值之间的根本差异,这些差异基于其评估中使用的程序。结论。公允价值和市场价值是两种不同类型的估价。公允价值可以与市场价值相同,但前提是存在活跃的市场。科学文献和专门文献中没有单一的公允价值概念。公允(IFRS)和市场(估值标准)评估使用了相同的方法,但每种方法所描述的方法并不总是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining the Fair Value concept for IFRS application
Subject. This article discusses the issue of defining the Fair Value concept, its similarity and identification with the concept of Market Value. It examines the specifics of each particular value, defines the concept of Fair Value, and analyzes approaches (methods) of fair value valuation, clarifies existing problems of determining fair value for the purposes of IFRS application. Objectives. The article aims to define the notion of Fair Value and appropriate use in accounting, as well as explore approaches to assess fair value. Methods. For the study, we used a comparative analysis. Results. The article says of many inconsistencies in the valuation of fair value, starting with the lack of a clear definition of fair value in IFRS, which is actually identified with the concept of market value. It proposes a refined definition of fair value and identifies fundamental differences between fair and market values, which are based on the procedures used in their assessment. Conclusions. Fair and market values are two different types of valuation. Fair value can be the same as market value, but only if there is an active market available. There is no single concept of Fair Value presented in scientific and special literature. The same approaches are used in fair (IFRS) and market (valuation standards) assessments, but the methods described for each approach are not always the same.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligenza Artificiale
Intelligenza Artificiale COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Special Issue NL4AI 2022: Workshop on natural language for artificial intelligence User-centric item characteristics for personalized multimedia systems: A systematic review Combining human intelligence and machine learning for fact-checking: Towards a hybrid human-in-the-loop framework A framework for safe decision making: A convex duality approach Grounding End-to-End Pre-trained architectures for Semantic Role Labeling in multiple languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1