情感狗是一只青光眼犬:接受社会直觉主义模型,从神经中心范式到数字范式

Q4 Arts and Humanities Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso Pub Date : 2022-06-10 DOI:10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp63-83
Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla
{"title":"情感狗是一只青光眼犬:接受社会直觉主义模型,从神经中心范式到数字范式","authors":"Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla","doi":"10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp63-83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I analyze the academic reception of Jonathan Haidt’s seminal article The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. My thesis is that in the spheres of philosophy and psychology, this article was initially studied within the neurocentric paradigm, which dominated the field of scientific reflection in the fifteen years following its publication. This neurocentric reading established a specific interpretation of the text with several limitations. However, more recently a digital paradigm has emerged and come to prevail in academia, providing a new perspective from which to return to Haidt’s text. Indeed, this approach makes it possible to unravel elements of the famous article that in the neurocentric paradigm went unnoticed by researchers. Moreover, the digital paradigm manages to better integrate Haidt’s seminal article into his later work as a whole.","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Emotional Dog Was a Glauconian Canine: The Reception of the Social Intuitionist Model, From the Neurocentric Paradigm to the Digital Paradigm\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla\",\"doi\":\"10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp63-83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article I analyze the academic reception of Jonathan Haidt’s seminal article The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. My thesis is that in the spheres of philosophy and psychology, this article was initially studied within the neurocentric paradigm, which dominated the field of scientific reflection in the fifteen years following its publication. This neurocentric reading established a specific interpretation of the text with several limitations. However, more recently a digital paradigm has emerged and come to prevail in academia, providing a new perspective from which to return to Haidt’s text. Indeed, this approach makes it possible to unravel elements of the famous article that in the neurocentric paradigm went unnoticed by researchers. Moreover, the digital paradigm manages to better integrate Haidt’s seminal article into his later work as a whole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp63-83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp63-83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我分析了乔纳森·海特的开创性文章《感性的狗和它的理性尾巴:道德判断的社会直觉主义方法》在学术上的接受情况。我的论点是,在哲学和心理学领域,这篇文章最初是在神经中心范式中进行研究的,该范式在其发表后的15年里主导了科学反思领域。这种以神经为中心的阅读建立了对文本的特定解释,但有一些局限性。然而,最近出现了一种数字范式,并在学术界盛行起来,为我们回到海特的文本提供了一个新的视角。事实上,这种方法使得解开那篇著名文章的元素成为可能,这些元素在神经中心范式中被研究人员忽视了。此外,数字范式设法更好地将海特的开创性文章作为一个整体整合到他后来的作品中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Emotional Dog Was a Glauconian Canine: The Reception of the Social Intuitionist Model, From the Neurocentric Paradigm to the Digital Paradigm
In this article I analyze the academic reception of Jonathan Haidt’s seminal article The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. My thesis is that in the spheres of philosophy and psychology, this article was initially studied within the neurocentric paradigm, which dominated the field of scientific reflection in the fifteen years following its publication. This neurocentric reading established a specific interpretation of the text with several limitations. However, more recently a digital paradigm has emerged and come to prevail in academia, providing a new perspective from which to return to Haidt’s text. Indeed, this approach makes it possible to unravel elements of the famous article that in the neurocentric paradigm went unnoticed by researchers. Moreover, the digital paradigm manages to better integrate Haidt’s seminal article into his later work as a whole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso
Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
El ideal de progreso y sus implicaciones en una educación cosmopolita desde el pensamiento kantiano Cognición motora en las ciencias de diseño Explicación y justificación: una interpretación de la epistemología naturalista de Quine a partir del antecedente kantiano Las neuronas espejo. Un caso de estudio de la relación neurociencia-filosofía What Neuroscience Tells Us About Mental Illness: Scientific Realism in the Biomedical Sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1