道德不是快乐和无忧无虑的生活的秘诀:采访齐格蒙特·鲍曼和亚历山德拉Jasińska-Kania

Krzysztof Sielski
{"title":"道德不是快乐和无忧无虑的生活的秘诀:采访齐格蒙特·鲍曼和亚历山德拉Jasińska-Kania","authors":"Krzysztof Sielski","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following text is a transcript of a conversation I had with Prof. Zygmunt Bauman and Prof. Aleksandra Jasińska-Kania in the spring of 2014. At that time I was finishing writing my doctoral dissertation on Karl Popper’s social theory. I was just grappling with one of the most serious objections raised against it when – quite by accident – I came across Bauman’s Liquid Modernity and quickly realized that a number of arguments formulated in it by Bauman, could be used in defense of Popper’s theory. Without thinking too much, I wrote a letter to Professor Bauman asking whether my intuitions were correct. Just a few hours later, I received a comprehensive reply, along with an invitation to the professor’s home in Leeds for an interview, a transcript of which I present below. During the conversation we discussed topics including moral choice, the relationship between freedom and safety, distinction between ethics and morality and animal rights. Although almost a decade has passed since the following conversation was conducted, I firmly believe that the thoughts contained in this talk are of such a universal nature that they will interest the reader also, and perhaps especially today.","PeriodicalId":36457,"journal":{"name":"Onati Socio-Legal Series","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morality is not a recipe for a happy and trouble-free life: Interview with Zygmunt Bauman and Aleksandra Jasińska-Kania\",\"authors\":\"Krzysztof Sielski\",\"doi\":\"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following text is a transcript of a conversation I had with Prof. Zygmunt Bauman and Prof. Aleksandra Jasińska-Kania in the spring of 2014. At that time I was finishing writing my doctoral dissertation on Karl Popper’s social theory. I was just grappling with one of the most serious objections raised against it when – quite by accident – I came across Bauman’s Liquid Modernity and quickly realized that a number of arguments formulated in it by Bauman, could be used in defense of Popper’s theory. Without thinking too much, I wrote a letter to Professor Bauman asking whether my intuitions were correct. Just a few hours later, I received a comprehensive reply, along with an invitation to the professor’s home in Leeds for an interview, a transcript of which I present below. During the conversation we discussed topics including moral choice, the relationship between freedom and safety, distinction between ethics and morality and animal rights. Although almost a decade has passed since the following conversation was conducted, I firmly believe that the thoughts contained in this talk are of such a universal nature that they will interest the reader also, and perhaps especially today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Onati Socio-Legal Series\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Onati Socio-Legal Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onati Socio-Legal Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下文本是我在2014年春天与Zygmunt Bauman教授和Aleksandra Jasińska Kania教授的一次对话记录。当时我正在完成关于卡尔·波普尔社会理论的博士论文的写作。当我偶然发现鲍曼的《流动的现代性》时,我正在努力解决对它提出的最严重的反对意见之一,并很快意识到鲍曼在其中提出的许多论点可以用来为波普尔的理论辩护。我不假思索地给鲍曼教授写了一封信,询问我的直觉是否正确。仅仅几个小时后,我就收到了一份全面的回复,同时还收到了去利兹教授家接受采访的邀请,我在下面提供了一份成绩单。在谈话中,我们讨论了包括道德选择、自由与安全之间的关系、伦理与道德之间的区别以及动物权利在内的话题。尽管以下对话已经过去了近十年,但我坚信,本次对话中包含的思想具有普遍性,读者也会对此感兴趣,尤其是在今天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Morality is not a recipe for a happy and trouble-free life: Interview with Zygmunt Bauman and Aleksandra Jasińska-Kania
The following text is a transcript of a conversation I had with Prof. Zygmunt Bauman and Prof. Aleksandra Jasińska-Kania in the spring of 2014. At that time I was finishing writing my doctoral dissertation on Karl Popper’s social theory. I was just grappling with one of the most serious objections raised against it when – quite by accident – I came across Bauman’s Liquid Modernity and quickly realized that a number of arguments formulated in it by Bauman, could be used in defense of Popper’s theory. Without thinking too much, I wrote a letter to Professor Bauman asking whether my intuitions were correct. Just a few hours later, I received a comprehensive reply, along with an invitation to the professor’s home in Leeds for an interview, a transcript of which I present below. During the conversation we discussed topics including moral choice, the relationship between freedom and safety, distinction between ethics and morality and animal rights. Although almost a decade has passed since the following conversation was conducted, I firmly believe that the thoughts contained in this talk are of such a universal nature that they will interest the reader also, and perhaps especially today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Onati Socio-Legal Series
Onati Socio-Legal Series Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rethinking legal time: The temporal turn in socio-legal studies Engaging with court research: The case of French terror trials The concept of speed in Luhmann’s schemata: The case of the Russian criminal justice Two tiers of judicial officers El delito de violación en el Código Penal español: sombras e indefiniciones de la construcción político-jurídica del consentimiento sexual
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1