组织归属——提出一个新的量表及其与人口统计、组织和结果变量的关系

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health Pub Date : 2023-02-24 DOI:10.1080/15555240.2023.2178448
G. Blau, D. Goldberg, Diana Kyser
{"title":"组织归属——提出一个新的量表及其与人口统计、组织和结果变量的关系","authors":"G. Blau, D. Goldberg, Diana Kyser","doi":"10.1080/15555240.2023.2178448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In view of its absence, a literature review covering Organizational Belonging (OB) and related constructs was done, and indicated the lack of a perceived OB scale, codified under one measure. OB was defined as “experiencing an acknowledgment of one’s talents, interests and experiences, and finding whole acceptance of one’s self expression of these.” Using a sample of 141 employees, twenty-seven OB items were adapted from three sources: prior quantitative work, prior qualitative work, and a survey on Diversity and Inclusion (American Institute for Certified Professional Accountants). Factor analytic support was found for a four-scale, 16-item OB measure. The four scales were labeled Be Myself (seven items), Acceptance (four items), Value Diversity (three items) and Connection (two items). Additional open-item analyses corroborated the validity of these scales. All four OB scales demonstrated sufficient reliability and distinctiveness from each other. These results validated the OB definition. After controlling for demographic and organizational variables, Be Myself had a significant impact on productivity and Acceptance had a significant impact on intent to stay. Future research testing this OB scale is needed, given the recent changes in the workplace, including remote work, retaining current staff, and hiring for unfilled positions.","PeriodicalId":45287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health","volume":"38 1","pages":"226 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational belonging – proposing a new scale and its relationship to demographic, organization, and outcome variables\",\"authors\":\"G. Blau, D. Goldberg, Diana Kyser\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15555240.2023.2178448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In view of its absence, a literature review covering Organizational Belonging (OB) and related constructs was done, and indicated the lack of a perceived OB scale, codified under one measure. OB was defined as “experiencing an acknowledgment of one’s talents, interests and experiences, and finding whole acceptance of one’s self expression of these.” Using a sample of 141 employees, twenty-seven OB items were adapted from three sources: prior quantitative work, prior qualitative work, and a survey on Diversity and Inclusion (American Institute for Certified Professional Accountants). Factor analytic support was found for a four-scale, 16-item OB measure. The four scales were labeled Be Myself (seven items), Acceptance (four items), Value Diversity (three items) and Connection (two items). Additional open-item analyses corroborated the validity of these scales. All four OB scales demonstrated sufficient reliability and distinctiveness from each other. These results validated the OB definition. After controlling for demographic and organizational variables, Be Myself had a significant impact on productivity and Acceptance had a significant impact on intent to stay. Future research testing this OB scale is needed, given the recent changes in the workplace, including remote work, retaining current staff, and hiring for unfilled positions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"226 - 253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2023.2178448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2023.2178448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要鉴于其缺乏,我们对组织归属(OB)和相关结构进行了文献综述,并指出缺乏一个可感知的OB量表,该量表被编纂为一个衡量标准。OB被定义为“体验对自己才能、兴趣和经验的认可,并完全接受自己对这些的表达。”使用141名员工的样本,27个OB项目从三个来源进行了调整:先前的定量工作、先前的定性工作、,以及一项关于多样性和包容性的调查(美国注册专业会计师协会)。因子分析支持四量表,16项OB测量。四个量表分别标记为“做自己”(七个项目)、“接受”(四个项目),“价值多样性”(三个项目)和“联系”(两个项目)。额外的开放项目分析证实了这些量表的有效性。所有四个OB量表都显示出足够的可靠性和彼此的独特性。这些结果验证了OB的定义。在控制了人口统计学和组织变量后,Be Myself对生产力有显著影响,而Acceptance对留下来的意愿有显著影响。考虑到最近工作场所的变化,包括远程工作、留住现有员工和招聘空缺职位,未来需要对这种OB量表进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Organizational belonging – proposing a new scale and its relationship to demographic, organization, and outcome variables
Abstract In view of its absence, a literature review covering Organizational Belonging (OB) and related constructs was done, and indicated the lack of a perceived OB scale, codified under one measure. OB was defined as “experiencing an acknowledgment of one’s talents, interests and experiences, and finding whole acceptance of one’s self expression of these.” Using a sample of 141 employees, twenty-seven OB items were adapted from three sources: prior quantitative work, prior qualitative work, and a survey on Diversity and Inclusion (American Institute for Certified Professional Accountants). Factor analytic support was found for a four-scale, 16-item OB measure. The four scales were labeled Be Myself (seven items), Acceptance (four items), Value Diversity (three items) and Connection (two items). Additional open-item analyses corroborated the validity of these scales. All four OB scales demonstrated sufficient reliability and distinctiveness from each other. These results validated the OB definition. After controlling for demographic and organizational variables, Be Myself had a significant impact on productivity and Acceptance had a significant impact on intent to stay. Future research testing this OB scale is needed, given the recent changes in the workplace, including remote work, retaining current staff, and hiring for unfilled positions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health
Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, retitled from Employee Assistance Quarterly to better reflect its expanded focus, presents innovative research, applied theory, and practical information to keep workplace human service administrators, counselors, and consultants up to date on the latest developments in the field. This refereed journal is an essential guide to best practice and research issues faced by EAP professionals who deal with work-related and personal issues including workplace and family wellness, employee benefits, and organizational development.
期刊最新文献
Moderating effects of self-construal on the associations of workload and role ambiguity with psychological distress: A cross-sectional and prospective study in a Japanese workplace Job satisfaction, work engagement and psychological distress among nurses: A mediated moderation model Expressive writing as a practice against work stress: An experimental study Quality of life in nurses from neurological wards: The mediating role of burnout Establishing an Employee Assistance Program at a Tertiary Healthcare Center in a Time of Multiple Crises: The Experience of the American University of Beirut Medical Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1