《马太福音》中的“抄写员”——评阿兰·柯克的《马太福音Q》

IF 1.3 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus Pub Date : 2017-12-11 DOI:10.1163/17455197-01502004
Robert A. Derrenbacker
{"title":"《马太福音》中的“抄写员”——评阿兰·柯克的《马太福音Q》","authors":"Robert A. Derrenbacker","doi":"10.1163/17455197-01502004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay is a review and assessment of Alan Kirk’s book Matthew in Q (Bloomsbury, 2016). After an overview of the book, the essay assesses Kirk’s work in three areas: 1) Matthew's memory of (without visual contact with) Mark and Q, 2) the type of literary dependence evidenced by Matthew, and 3) Matthew and the mechanics of ancient media.","PeriodicalId":51987,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus","volume":"15 1","pages":"213-223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/17455197-01502004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Matthew as Scribal Tradent: An Assessment of Alan Kirk’s Q in Matthew\",\"authors\":\"Robert A. Derrenbacker\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/17455197-01502004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay is a review and assessment of Alan Kirk’s book Matthew in Q (Bloomsbury, 2016). After an overview of the book, the essay assesses Kirk’s work in three areas: 1) Matthew's memory of (without visual contact with) Mark and Q, 2) the type of literary dependence evidenced by Matthew, and 3) Matthew and the mechanics of ancient media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"213-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/17455197-01502004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/17455197-01502004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/17455197-01502004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是对Alan Kirk的著作《Q中的马太福音》(Bloomsbury,2016)的回顾和评价。在概述了这本书之后,本文从三个方面评估了柯克的作品:1)马修对马克和Q的记忆(没有视觉接触),2)马修所证明的文学依赖类型,3)马修和古代媒体的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Matthew as Scribal Tradent: An Assessment of Alan Kirk’s Q in Matthew
This essay is a review and assessment of Alan Kirk’s book Matthew in Q (Bloomsbury, 2016). After an overview of the book, the essay assesses Kirk’s work in three areas: 1) Matthew's memory of (without visual contact with) Mark and Q, 2) the type of literary dependence evidenced by Matthew, and 3) Matthew and the mechanics of ancient media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus provides an international forum for the academic discussion of Jesus within the context of first-century Palestine. The journal is accessible to all who are interested in how this complex topic has been addressed in the past and how it is approached today. The journal investigates the social, cultural and historical context in which Jesus lived, discusses methodological issues surrounding the reconstruction of the historical Jesus, examines the history of research on Jesus and explores how the life of Jesus has been portrayed in the arts and other media.
期刊最新文献
Why Name Popularity is a Good Test of Historicity: A Goodness-of-Fit Test Analysis on Names in the Gospels and Acts Teaching the Historical Jesus over Three Decades, from Waikato to London Thoughts on Teaching Critical History Using the Historical Jesus He’s No Spartacus: Jesus, Slavery, and the Utopian Imagination Jesus: A Life in Class Conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1