优化大规模生物多样性采样工作:走向不平衡的调查设计

IF 3.2 4区 地球科学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Oceanography Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.5670/oceanog.2021.216
E. Montes, J. Lefcheck, Edlin Guerra Castro, Eduardo Klein, Ana Carolina de Azevedo Mazzuco, G. Bigatti, C. Cordeiro, N. Simões, E. Macaya, Nicolas Moity, E. Londoño-Cruz, B. Helmuth, F. Choi, E. Soto, P. Miloslavich, F. Muller‐Karger
{"title":"优化大规模生物多样性采样工作:走向不平衡的调查设计","authors":"E. Montes, J. Lefcheck, Edlin Guerra Castro, Eduardo Klein, Ana Carolina de Azevedo Mazzuco, G. Bigatti, C. Cordeiro, N. Simões, E. Macaya, Nicolas Moity, E. Londoño-Cruz, B. Helmuth, F. Choi, E. Soto, P. Miloslavich, F. Muller‐Karger","doi":"10.5670/oceanog.2021.216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acquiring marine biodiversity data is difficult, costly, and time-consuming, making it challenging to understand the distribution and abundance of life in the ocean. Historically, approaches to biodiversity sampling over large geographic scales have advocated for equivalent effort across multiple sites to minimize comparative bias. When effort cannot be equalized, techniques such as rarefaction have been applied to minimize biases by reverting diversity estimates to equivalent numbers of samples or individuals. This often results in oversampling and wasted resources or inaccurately characterized communities due to undersampling. How, then, can we better determine an optimal survey design for characterizing species richness and community composition across a range of conditions and capacities without compromising taxonomic resolution and statistical power? Researchers in the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network Pole to Pole of the Americas (MBON Pole to Pole) are surveying rocky shore macroinvertebrates and algal communities spanning ~107° of latitude and 10 biogeographic ecoregions to address this question. Here, we apply existing techniques in the form of fixed-coverage subsampling and a complementary multivariate analysis to determine the optimal effort necessary for characterizing species richness and community composition across the network sampling sites. We show that oversampling for species richness varied between ~20% and 400% at over half of studied areas, while some locations were undersampled by up to 50%. Multivariate error analysis also revealed that most of the localities were oversampled by several-fold for benthic community composition. From this analysis, we advocate for an unbalanced sampling approach to support field programs in the collection of high-quality data, where preliminary information is used to set the minimum required effort to generate robust values of diversity and composition on a site-to-site basis. As part of this recommendation, we provide statistical tools in the open-source R statistical software to aid researchers in implementing optimization strategies and expanding the geographic footprint or sampling frequency of regional biodiversity survey programs.","PeriodicalId":54695,"journal":{"name":"Oceanography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Large-Scale Biodiversity Sampling Effort: Toward an Unbalanced Survey Design\",\"authors\":\"E. Montes, J. Lefcheck, Edlin Guerra Castro, Eduardo Klein, Ana Carolina de Azevedo Mazzuco, G. Bigatti, C. Cordeiro, N. Simões, E. Macaya, Nicolas Moity, E. Londoño-Cruz, B. Helmuth, F. Choi, E. Soto, P. Miloslavich, F. Muller‐Karger\",\"doi\":\"10.5670/oceanog.2021.216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Acquiring marine biodiversity data is difficult, costly, and time-consuming, making it challenging to understand the distribution and abundance of life in the ocean. Historically, approaches to biodiversity sampling over large geographic scales have advocated for equivalent effort across multiple sites to minimize comparative bias. When effort cannot be equalized, techniques such as rarefaction have been applied to minimize biases by reverting diversity estimates to equivalent numbers of samples or individuals. This often results in oversampling and wasted resources or inaccurately characterized communities due to undersampling. How, then, can we better determine an optimal survey design for characterizing species richness and community composition across a range of conditions and capacities without compromising taxonomic resolution and statistical power? Researchers in the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network Pole to Pole of the Americas (MBON Pole to Pole) are surveying rocky shore macroinvertebrates and algal communities spanning ~107° of latitude and 10 biogeographic ecoregions to address this question. Here, we apply existing techniques in the form of fixed-coverage subsampling and a complementary multivariate analysis to determine the optimal effort necessary for characterizing species richness and community composition across the network sampling sites. We show that oversampling for species richness varied between ~20% and 400% at over half of studied areas, while some locations were undersampled by up to 50%. Multivariate error analysis also revealed that most of the localities were oversampled by several-fold for benthic community composition. From this analysis, we advocate for an unbalanced sampling approach to support field programs in the collection of high-quality data, where preliminary information is used to set the minimum required effort to generate robust values of diversity and composition on a site-to-site basis. As part of this recommendation, we provide statistical tools in the open-source R statistical software to aid researchers in implementing optimization strategies and expanding the geographic footprint or sampling frequency of regional biodiversity survey programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oceanography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oceanography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2021.216\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2021.216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

获取海洋生物多样性数据既困难、昂贵又耗时,这使得了解海洋中生命的分布和丰度具有挑战性。从历史上看,在大地理范围内进行生物多样性采样的方法主张在多个地点进行同等努力,以最大限度地减少比较偏差。当努力无法均衡时,已经应用了稀疏等技术,通过将多样性估计恢复为等效数量的样本或个体来最大限度地减少偏差。这通常会导致过度采样和资源浪费,或者由于采样不足而导致社区特征不准确。那么,我们如何在不影响分类分辨率和统计能力的情况下,更好地确定一个最佳调查设计,以表征一系列条件和能力下的物种丰富度和群落组成?美洲极地海洋生物多样性观测网络(MBON Pole-to-Pole of the Americas)的研究人员正在调查横跨约107°纬度和10个生物地理生态区的岩石海岸大型无脊椎动物和藻类群落,以解决这个问题。在这里,我们应用固定覆盖子采样和互补多元分析形式的现有技术,以确定表征网络采样点物种丰富度和群落组成所需的最佳努力。我们发现,在超过一半的研究区域,物种丰富度的过度采样在约20%至400%之间,而一些地区的采样不足高达50%。多变量误差分析还显示,大多数地区的底栖生物群落组成样本过多。根据这一分析,我们主张采用不平衡抽样方法来支持现场项目收集高质量数据,其中初步信息用于设定在现场基础上生成稳健的多样性和组成值所需的最小努力。作为该建议的一部分,我们在开源R统计软件中提供了统计工具,以帮助研究人员实施优化策略,并扩大区域生物多样性调查项目的地理足迹或采样频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing Large-Scale Biodiversity Sampling Effort: Toward an Unbalanced Survey Design
Acquiring marine biodiversity data is difficult, costly, and time-consuming, making it challenging to understand the distribution and abundance of life in the ocean. Historically, approaches to biodiversity sampling over large geographic scales have advocated for equivalent effort across multiple sites to minimize comparative bias. When effort cannot be equalized, techniques such as rarefaction have been applied to minimize biases by reverting diversity estimates to equivalent numbers of samples or individuals. This often results in oversampling and wasted resources or inaccurately characterized communities due to undersampling. How, then, can we better determine an optimal survey design for characterizing species richness and community composition across a range of conditions and capacities without compromising taxonomic resolution and statistical power? Researchers in the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network Pole to Pole of the Americas (MBON Pole to Pole) are surveying rocky shore macroinvertebrates and algal communities spanning ~107° of latitude and 10 biogeographic ecoregions to address this question. Here, we apply existing techniques in the form of fixed-coverage subsampling and a complementary multivariate analysis to determine the optimal effort necessary for characterizing species richness and community composition across the network sampling sites. We show that oversampling for species richness varied between ~20% and 400% at over half of studied areas, while some locations were undersampled by up to 50%. Multivariate error analysis also revealed that most of the localities were oversampled by several-fold for benthic community composition. From this analysis, we advocate for an unbalanced sampling approach to support field programs in the collection of high-quality data, where preliminary information is used to set the minimum required effort to generate robust values of diversity and composition on a site-to-site basis. As part of this recommendation, we provide statistical tools in the open-source R statistical software to aid researchers in implementing optimization strategies and expanding the geographic footprint or sampling frequency of regional biodiversity survey programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oceanography
Oceanography 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: First published in July 1988, Oceanography is the official magazine of The Oceanography Society. It contains peer-reviewed articles that chronicle all aspects of ocean science and its applications. In addition, Oceanography solicits and publishes news and information, meeting reports, hands-on laboratory exercises, career profiles, book reviews, and shorter, editor-reviewed articles that address public policy and education and how they are affected by science and technology. We encourage submission of short papers to the Breaking Waves section that describe novel approaches to multidisciplinary problems in ocean science.
期刊最新文献
Cooperative Learning in Oceanography Unpaid Internships Are a Barrier to Diverse and Equitable Recruitment in Marine Science Hot Vents Beneath an Icy Ocean: The Aurora Vent Field, Gakkel Ridge, Revealed Evaluating the Evolving Ocean Acidification Risk to Dungeness Crab: Time-Series Observations and Modeling on the Olympic Coast, Washington, USA Global Synthesis of the Status and Trends of Ocean Acidification Impacts on Shelled Pteropods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1