编者点评:乐队是一个四个字母的单词

B. Silvey
{"title":"编者点评:乐队是一个四个字母的单词","authors":"B. Silvey","doi":"10.1177/87551233221148297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I spend too much of my free time perusing the Band Directors Facebook Group. The group is (mostly) a terrific resource for instrumental music educators who are looking for advice about a variety of topics such as repertoire selection, dealing with administrators and caregivers, and classroom management strategies. Periodically, as is often the case with social media, someone will post a screed about something that they found terrible. Put more diplomatically, a “thought-provoking essay.” One of these appeared online after the November 2022 National Association for Music Education National Conference. Essentially, the author thought that many presenters at the conference were espousing that (a) general music approaches should be the primary approach to music education because ensembles are exclusionary and cost-prohibitive, (b) nontraditional music classes and ensembles should be the future of music education, and (c) competition is too much the focus of large ensemble performance. (If you want to read the comments related to this post, I suggest getting some popcorn and scheduling a good hour.) Having attended the conference, I did not believe that these topics were the primary focus of those who presented, but it did spark my interest as to why so many large ensemble directors become agitated when these ideas are circulated. Our world has turned in to one where we feel the need to win, resulting in an often-polarized society (Klein, 2020). As a result, the idea that “two things can be true at once” does not resonate with a large swath of the population. Because I help prepare undergraduates to become instrumental music educators and am a band director myself, I believe in the importance of the large ensemble as part of a holistic music education experience. (One thing is true.) However, I also believe that we have placed too much emphasis on secondary school large ensembles (e.g., funding and staffing, the exalted place of specific composers and their pieces as artifacts, the need for competitions to justify our importance, and a top-down approach to music teaching and learning). (Another thing is true.) I also understand how directors who have spent their careers positively affecting the lives of hundreds and thousands of students could see a perceived move away from the large ensemble as the central force in music education as detrimental or counterproductive. My encouragement to K–12 music teachers and university music education faculty members is to remember the axiom that “one size does not fit all.” I want to advance this idea briefly through the prism of the three viewpoints that were mentioned earlier:","PeriodicalId":75281,"journal":{"name":"Update (Music Educators National Conference (U.S.))","volume":" ","pages":"3 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comments from the Editor: Band Is a Four-Letter Word\",\"authors\":\"B. Silvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551233221148297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I spend too much of my free time perusing the Band Directors Facebook Group. The group is (mostly) a terrific resource for instrumental music educators who are looking for advice about a variety of topics such as repertoire selection, dealing with administrators and caregivers, and classroom management strategies. Periodically, as is often the case with social media, someone will post a screed about something that they found terrible. Put more diplomatically, a “thought-provoking essay.” One of these appeared online after the November 2022 National Association for Music Education National Conference. Essentially, the author thought that many presenters at the conference were espousing that (a) general music approaches should be the primary approach to music education because ensembles are exclusionary and cost-prohibitive, (b) nontraditional music classes and ensembles should be the future of music education, and (c) competition is too much the focus of large ensemble performance. (If you want to read the comments related to this post, I suggest getting some popcorn and scheduling a good hour.) Having attended the conference, I did not believe that these topics were the primary focus of those who presented, but it did spark my interest as to why so many large ensemble directors become agitated when these ideas are circulated. Our world has turned in to one where we feel the need to win, resulting in an often-polarized society (Klein, 2020). As a result, the idea that “two things can be true at once” does not resonate with a large swath of the population. Because I help prepare undergraduates to become instrumental music educators and am a band director myself, I believe in the importance of the large ensemble as part of a holistic music education experience. (One thing is true.) However, I also believe that we have placed too much emphasis on secondary school large ensembles (e.g., funding and staffing, the exalted place of specific composers and their pieces as artifacts, the need for competitions to justify our importance, and a top-down approach to music teaching and learning). (Another thing is true.) I also understand how directors who have spent their careers positively affecting the lives of hundreds and thousands of students could see a perceived move away from the large ensemble as the central force in music education as detrimental or counterproductive. My encouragement to K–12 music teachers and university music education faculty members is to remember the axiom that “one size does not fit all.” I want to advance this idea briefly through the prism of the three viewpoints that were mentioned earlier:\",\"PeriodicalId\":75281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Update (Music Educators National Conference (U.S.))\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Update (Music Educators National Conference (U.S.))\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233221148297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Update (Music Educators National Conference (U.S.))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233221148297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我花了太多的空闲时间浏览乐队总监Facebook群组。该小组(主要)是器乐教育工作者的绝佳资源,他们正在寻求有关曲目选择、与管理员和护理人员打交道以及课堂管理策略等各种主题的建议。像社交媒体上经常发生的那样,有人会定期发布他们觉得糟糕的事情。更具外交意味的是,一篇“发人深省的文章”。其中一篇在2022年11月全国音乐教育协会全国会议后出现在网上。从本质上讲,作者认为会议上的许多演讲者都支持:(a)一般的音乐方法应该是音乐教育的主要方法,因为合奏是排斥性的,成本高昂;(b)非传统的音乐课程和合奏应该是音乐教育的未来;(c)大型合奏表演过于注重竞争。(如果你想阅读与这篇文章相关的评论,我建议你吃点爆米花,安排一个好的时间。我们的世界已经变成了一个我们觉得有必要获胜的世界,导致了一个经常两极分化的社会(Klein,2020)。因此,“两件事可以同时成真”的想法并没有引起广大民众的共鸣。因为我帮助本科生做好成为器乐教育者的准备,而且我自己也是一名乐队总监,所以我相信大型合奏作为整体音乐教育体验的一部分的重要性。(有一点是正确的。)然而,我也认为我们过于强调中学大型合奏团(例如,资金和人员配备,特定作曲家及其作品作为文物的崇高地位,需要通过比赛来证明我们的重要性,以及自上而下的音乐教学方法)。(另一件事是真的。)我也明白,那些在职业生涯中对成百上千名学生的生活产生了积极影响的导演们,会认为脱离大型合奏团作为音乐教育的核心力量是有害的或适得其反的。我对K-12音乐教师和大学音乐教育教员的鼓励是记住“一刀切”这一公理。我想通过前面提到的三种观点来简要地推进这一想法:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comments from the Editor: Band Is a Four-Letter Word
I spend too much of my free time perusing the Band Directors Facebook Group. The group is (mostly) a terrific resource for instrumental music educators who are looking for advice about a variety of topics such as repertoire selection, dealing with administrators and caregivers, and classroom management strategies. Periodically, as is often the case with social media, someone will post a screed about something that they found terrible. Put more diplomatically, a “thought-provoking essay.” One of these appeared online after the November 2022 National Association for Music Education National Conference. Essentially, the author thought that many presenters at the conference were espousing that (a) general music approaches should be the primary approach to music education because ensembles are exclusionary and cost-prohibitive, (b) nontraditional music classes and ensembles should be the future of music education, and (c) competition is too much the focus of large ensemble performance. (If you want to read the comments related to this post, I suggest getting some popcorn and scheduling a good hour.) Having attended the conference, I did not believe that these topics were the primary focus of those who presented, but it did spark my interest as to why so many large ensemble directors become agitated when these ideas are circulated. Our world has turned in to one where we feel the need to win, resulting in an often-polarized society (Klein, 2020). As a result, the idea that “two things can be true at once” does not resonate with a large swath of the population. Because I help prepare undergraduates to become instrumental music educators and am a band director myself, I believe in the importance of the large ensemble as part of a holistic music education experience. (One thing is true.) However, I also believe that we have placed too much emphasis on secondary school large ensembles (e.g., funding and staffing, the exalted place of specific composers and their pieces as artifacts, the need for competitions to justify our importance, and a top-down approach to music teaching and learning). (Another thing is true.) I also understand how directors who have spent their careers positively affecting the lives of hundreds and thousands of students could see a perceived move away from the large ensemble as the central force in music education as detrimental or counterproductive. My encouragement to K–12 music teachers and university music education faculty members is to remember the axiom that “one size does not fit all.” I want to advance this idea briefly through the prism of the three viewpoints that were mentioned earlier:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Class Piano: A Review of Literature Feedback Methods in the Music Classroom: A Review of Literature The Role of Research in Music Education Master’s Programs: Examining Students’ Attitudes Fostering Trust in Music Classrooms: A Review of the Literature Undocumented Immigrant Status: Implications for Music Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1