Anit Bhattacharyya, Lily D Hopkinson, Paul S Nolet, John Srbely
{"title":"腰痛或颈痛患者压痛阈值的可靠性:一项系统综述","authors":"Anit Bhattacharyya, Lily D Hopkinson, Paul S Nolet, John Srbely","doi":"10.1177/20494637231196647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Low-back and neck pain affect a great number of individuals worldwide. The pressure pain threshold has the potential to be a useful quantitative measure of mechanical pain in a clinical setting, if it proves to be reliable in this population. The objectives of this systematic review are to: (1) analyze the literature evaluating the reliability of pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurements in the assessment of neck and low-back pain, (2) summarize the evidence from these studies, and (3) characterize the limitations of PPT measurement.</p><p><strong>Databases and data treatment: </strong>Relevant literature from PubMed and the Web of Science electronic databases were screened in a 3-step process according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Relevant studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) tool, and results of all studies were summarized and tabulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 922 citations identified, 11 studies were deemed relevant for critical appraisal, and 8 studies were deemed to have low risk-of bias. Intra-rater reliability, reported in all studies (<i>n</i> = 637) and inter-rater reliability, reported in 2 studies (<i>n</i> = 200) were consistently reported to be good to excellent (ICC 0.75-0.99 and ICC 0.81-0.90, respectively). Studies were also found to have significant variation in PPT measurement procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though intra- and inter-rater reliability was found to be high in all studies, the variation in PPT measurement protocols could affect validity and absolute reliability. As such, it is recommended that standard guidelines be developed for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Anit Bhattacharyya, Lily D Hopkinson, Paul S Nolet, John Srbely\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20494637231196647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Low-back and neck pain affect a great number of individuals worldwide. The pressure pain threshold has the potential to be a useful quantitative measure of mechanical pain in a clinical setting, if it proves to be reliable in this population. The objectives of this systematic review are to: (1) analyze the literature evaluating the reliability of pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurements in the assessment of neck and low-back pain, (2) summarize the evidence from these studies, and (3) characterize the limitations of PPT measurement.</p><p><strong>Databases and data treatment: </strong>Relevant literature from PubMed and the Web of Science electronic databases were screened in a 3-step process according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Relevant studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) tool, and results of all studies were summarized and tabulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 922 citations identified, 11 studies were deemed relevant for critical appraisal, and 8 studies were deemed to have low risk-of bias. Intra-rater reliability, reported in all studies (<i>n</i> = 637) and inter-rater reliability, reported in 2 studies (<i>n</i> = 200) were consistently reported to be good to excellent (ICC 0.75-0.99 and ICC 0.81-0.90, respectively). Studies were also found to have significant variation in PPT measurement procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though intra- and inter-rater reliability was found to be high in all studies, the variation in PPT measurement protocols could affect validity and absolute reliability. As such, it is recommended that standard guidelines be developed for clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642499/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637231196647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637231196647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
腰痛和颈部疼痛影响着全世界许多人。如果压痛阈值在这一人群中被证明是可靠的,那么它有可能成为临床环境中机械疼痛的有用定量测量。本系统综述的目的是:(1)分析评估颈部和腰痛中压痛阈值(PPT)测量可靠性的文献,(2)总结这些研究的证据,以及(3)描述PPT测量的局限性。PubMed和Web of Science电子数据库的相关文献根据纳入/排除标准分三步筛选。使用可靠性研究质量评估(QAREL)工具评估相关研究的偏倚风险,并将所有研究的结果汇总并制成表格。在确定的922篇引文中,11项研究被认为与批判性评价相关,8项研究被视为偏倚风险较低。在所有研究中报告的评分者内部可靠性(n=637)和在2项研究(n=200)中报告的评级者间可靠性一致报告为良好至优秀(ICC分别为0.75–0.99和0.81–0.90)。研究还发现PPT测量程序存在显著差异。尽管在所有研究中,评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性都很高,但PPT测量方案的变化可能会影响有效性和绝对可靠性。因此,建议制定临床使用的标准指南。
The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review.
Background and objective: Low-back and neck pain affect a great number of individuals worldwide. The pressure pain threshold has the potential to be a useful quantitative measure of mechanical pain in a clinical setting, if it proves to be reliable in this population. The objectives of this systematic review are to: (1) analyze the literature evaluating the reliability of pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurements in the assessment of neck and low-back pain, (2) summarize the evidence from these studies, and (3) characterize the limitations of PPT measurement.
Databases and data treatment: Relevant literature from PubMed and the Web of Science electronic databases were screened in a 3-step process according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Relevant studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) tool, and results of all studies were summarized and tabulated.
Results: Of 922 citations identified, 11 studies were deemed relevant for critical appraisal, and 8 studies were deemed to have low risk-of bias. Intra-rater reliability, reported in all studies (n = 637) and inter-rater reliability, reported in 2 studies (n = 200) were consistently reported to be good to excellent (ICC 0.75-0.99 and ICC 0.81-0.90, respectively). Studies were also found to have significant variation in PPT measurement procedures.
Conclusions: Though intra- and inter-rater reliability was found to be high in all studies, the variation in PPT measurement protocols could affect validity and absolute reliability. As such, it is recommended that standard guidelines be developed for clinical use.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.