不要拘泥于适用于问题委员会

Neriman POLAT ÇELTİKCİ, M. Atay
{"title":"不要拘泥于适用于问题委员会","authors":"Neriman POLAT ÇELTİKCİ, M. Atay","doi":"10.18070/erciyesiibd.883040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, independent auditors' perceptions towards audit quality are investigated with the Key Audit Matters (KAM) standard practice. For this reason, surveys were conducted to independent auditors who work actively in independent audit firms. Two scales developed by researcher were used in the applied surveys. The statements in the scales were prepared based on national and international literature. These scales are \"KAM Perception Scale\" and \"Quality (Quality Assurance System-QAS) Perception Scale\". First, factor analysis applied to the survey results in order to determine the extent of KAM and audit quality. Then, the data obtained were applied reliability analysis, correlation and regression analysis. The data were analyzed in the R program. In the research findings, it has been revealed that effective handling of KAM practices in risk assessment and especially in the risk response process, positively affects the audit quality within the scope of quality control activities.","PeriodicalId":53159,"journal":{"name":"Erciyes Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI (KDK) STANDARDI UYGULAMASI İLE BAĞIMSIZ DENETİM KALİTE İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA\",\"authors\":\"Neriman POLAT ÇELTİKCİ, M. Atay\",\"doi\":\"10.18070/erciyesiibd.883040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, independent auditors' perceptions towards audit quality are investigated with the Key Audit Matters (KAM) standard practice. For this reason, surveys were conducted to independent auditors who work actively in independent audit firms. Two scales developed by researcher were used in the applied surveys. The statements in the scales were prepared based on national and international literature. These scales are \\\"KAM Perception Scale\\\" and \\\"Quality (Quality Assurance System-QAS) Perception Scale\\\". First, factor analysis applied to the survey results in order to determine the extent of KAM and audit quality. Then, the data obtained were applied reliability analysis, correlation and regression analysis. The data were analyzed in the R program. In the research findings, it has been revealed that effective handling of KAM practices in risk assessment and especially in the risk response process, positively affects the audit quality within the scope of quality control activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Erciyes Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Erciyes Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.883040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erciyes Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.883040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这项研究中,独立审计师对审计质量的看法是根据关键审计事项(KAM)标准实践进行调查的。因此,对在独立审计公司积极工作的独立审计师进行了调查。研究人员开发的两个量表被用于应用调查。比额表中的说明是根据国家和国际文献编制的。这些量表是“KAM感知量表”和“质量(质量保证体系QAS)感知量表。首先,将因子分析应用于调查结果,以确定KAM准则的范围和审计质量。然后,对所得数据进行了可靠性分析、相关分析和回归分析。数据在R程序中进行了分析。研究结果表明,在风险评估中,特别是在风险应对过程中,有效处理KAM准则对质量控制活动范围内的审计质量产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI (KDK) STANDARDI UYGULAMASI İLE BAĞIMSIZ DENETİM KALİTE İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA
In this study, independent auditors' perceptions towards audit quality are investigated with the Key Audit Matters (KAM) standard practice. For this reason, surveys were conducted to independent auditors who work actively in independent audit firms. Two scales developed by researcher were used in the applied surveys. The statements in the scales were prepared based on national and international literature. These scales are "KAM Perception Scale" and "Quality (Quality Assurance System-QAS) Perception Scale". First, factor analysis applied to the survey results in order to determine the extent of KAM and audit quality. Then, the data obtained were applied reliability analysis, correlation and regression analysis. The data were analyzed in the R program. In the research findings, it has been revealed that effective handling of KAM practices in risk assessment and especially in the risk response process, positively affects the audit quality within the scope of quality control activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLARIN VE TURİZMİN ENERJİ GÜVENLİĞİNE ETKİSİ: SİNGAPUR ÜZERİNE EKONOMETRİK BİR İNCELEME AKILLI PERAKENDECİLİK: KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVE, BİLEŞENLER VE ZORLUKLAR BÜROKRASİ TEORİLERİ’NİN YÖNETİM PSİKOLOJİSİ BAĞLAMINDA TEORİK BİR TAHLİLİ ENTREPRENEURSHIP OPPORTUNITIES: SMART CITY AND DIGITALIZATION THE IMPACT OF MONETARY SHOCKS ON INFLATION IN SELECTED WEST ASIAN COUNTRIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1