课程知识作为响应式教学资源的个案研究

IF 2.3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Cognition and Instruction Pub Date : 2020-10-28 DOI:10.1080/07370008.2020.1832096
Amy D. Robertson, K. Gray, Clarissa E. Lovegren, Kathryn L. Killough, Scott T. Wenzinger
{"title":"课程知识作为响应式教学资源的个案研究","authors":"Amy D. Robertson, K. Gray, Clarissa E. Lovegren, Kathryn L. Killough, Scott T. Wenzinger","doi":"10.1080/07370008.2020.1832096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Responsive instruction—or instruction that foregrounds and takes up the disciplinary substance of student thinking—is both a hallmark of recent STEM education reforms and challenging to enact. This kind of instruction may be especially challenging in instructional contexts that mandate or rely on curriculum with set, structured learning trajectories for students. In this paper, we propose a new component of curricular knowledge—in particular, an understanding of the purposes of questions or sequences of questions in research-based instructional materials. We show that this kind of curricular knowledge supported the enactment of responsive instructional practices among one cohort of 14 undergraduate physics Learning Assistants, illustrating the relationship between curricular knowledge and responsive instruction. We document some of the key phases in and tools that supported the development of this cohort’s curricular knowledge, lending insight into how teacher educators might support the development of curricular knowledge in their own contexts.","PeriodicalId":47945,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Instruction","volume":"39 1","pages":"149 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07370008.2020.1832096","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Curricular Knowledge as a Resource for Responsive Instruction: A Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Amy D. Robertson, K. Gray, Clarissa E. Lovegren, Kathryn L. Killough, Scott T. Wenzinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07370008.2020.1832096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Responsive instruction—or instruction that foregrounds and takes up the disciplinary substance of student thinking—is both a hallmark of recent STEM education reforms and challenging to enact. This kind of instruction may be especially challenging in instructional contexts that mandate or rely on curriculum with set, structured learning trajectories for students. In this paper, we propose a new component of curricular knowledge—in particular, an understanding of the purposes of questions or sequences of questions in research-based instructional materials. We show that this kind of curricular knowledge supported the enactment of responsive instructional practices among one cohort of 14 undergraduate physics Learning Assistants, illustrating the relationship between curricular knowledge and responsive instruction. We document some of the key phases in and tools that supported the development of this cohort’s curricular knowledge, lending insight into how teacher educators might support the development of curricular knowledge in their own contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"149 - 180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07370008.2020.1832096\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1832096\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1832096","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要响应式教学——或突出并占据学生思维学科实质的教学——既是最近STEM教育改革的标志,也是实施起来的挑战。在要求或依赖于为学生提供固定、结构化学习轨迹的课程的教学环境中,这种教学可能特别具有挑战性。在本文中,我们提出了课程知识的一个新组成部分——特别是对研究性教学材料中问题或问题序列的目的的理解。我们发现,这类课程知识支持在一个由14名本科生物理学习助理组成的队列中实施响应式教学实践,说明了课程知识和响应式教学之间的关系。我们记录了支持这一群体课程知识发展的一些关键阶段和工具,深入了解教师教育工作者如何在自己的背景下支持课程知识的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Curricular Knowledge as a Resource for Responsive Instruction: A Case Study
Abstract Responsive instruction—or instruction that foregrounds and takes up the disciplinary substance of student thinking—is both a hallmark of recent STEM education reforms and challenging to enact. This kind of instruction may be especially challenging in instructional contexts that mandate or rely on curriculum with set, structured learning trajectories for students. In this paper, we propose a new component of curricular knowledge—in particular, an understanding of the purposes of questions or sequences of questions in research-based instructional materials. We show that this kind of curricular knowledge supported the enactment of responsive instructional practices among one cohort of 14 undergraduate physics Learning Assistants, illustrating the relationship between curricular knowledge and responsive instruction. We document some of the key phases in and tools that supported the development of this cohort’s curricular knowledge, lending insight into how teacher educators might support the development of curricular knowledge in their own contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Among education journals, Cognition and Instruction"s distinctive niche is rigorous study of foundational issues concerning the mental, socio-cultural, and mediational processes and conditions of learning and intellectual competence. For these purposes, both “cognition” and “instruction” must be interpreted broadly. The journal preferentially attends to the “how” of learning and intellectual practices. A balance of well-reasoned theory and careful and reflective empirical technique is typical.
期刊最新文献
Teacher Cultivation of Classroom Statistical Modeling Practice: A Case Study Learning Inside the School, but Outside the Curriculum: An Extreme Case of Interest-Driven Learning in Alternative STEAM Learning Infrastructure for Schools The Intertwining of Children’s Interests and Micro-Practices at a Science Museum: Case Study of Three Children The Problem With Perspective: Students’ and Teachers’ Reasoning About Credibility During Discussions of Online Sources Collaborative Troubleshooting in STEM: A Case Study of High School Students Finding and Fixing Code, Circuit and Craft Challenges in Electronic Textiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1