地球科学课程:通过学习分类法和成果教育的方法

Q1 Social Sciences Higher Education for the Future Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2347631119886403
Manulal P. Ram, K. Ajay, Gopinathan Nair A.
{"title":"地球科学课程:通过学习分类法和成果教育的方法","authors":"Manulal P. Ram, K. Ajay, Gopinathan Nair A.","doi":"10.1177/2347631119886403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning outcomes are inevitably to be declared by any university and educational institution at every level of their programmes. It should have a general scheme for all programmes regardless of the discipline specificities, individual courses or even independent instructional units. Such outcomes are stated at different levels based on the taxonomy of learning adopted in each scheme. People follow different learning taxonomies for stating course contents, designing the assessment items and measuring the attainment. In this work, revised Bloom’s taxonomy (Anderson and Krathwohl, 2001) has been adopted as a classic model to express different cognitive levels in outcome statements and assessment items. This has been demonstrated here based on an 80 credit postgraduate programme in geology offered by state universities and autonomous institutions. This article presents outcome statements and assessment items for three courses of the programme, namely (a) Biostratigraphy and Palaeontology, (b) Metamorphic Petrology and (c) Structural Geology, which can be ideal specimen for adopting the learning taxonomy and outcome-based education in any similar disciplines of educational programmes.","PeriodicalId":36834,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education for the Future","volume":"7 1","pages":"22 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2347631119886403","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geoscience Curriculum: Approach Through Learning Taxonomy and Outcome Based Education\",\"authors\":\"Manulal P. Ram, K. Ajay, Gopinathan Nair A.\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2347631119886403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning outcomes are inevitably to be declared by any university and educational institution at every level of their programmes. It should have a general scheme for all programmes regardless of the discipline specificities, individual courses or even independent instructional units. Such outcomes are stated at different levels based on the taxonomy of learning adopted in each scheme. People follow different learning taxonomies for stating course contents, designing the assessment items and measuring the attainment. In this work, revised Bloom’s taxonomy (Anderson and Krathwohl, 2001) has been adopted as a classic model to express different cognitive levels in outcome statements and assessment items. This has been demonstrated here based on an 80 credit postgraduate programme in geology offered by state universities and autonomous institutions. This article presents outcome statements and assessment items for three courses of the programme, namely (a) Biostratigraphy and Palaeontology, (b) Metamorphic Petrology and (c) Structural Geology, which can be ideal specimen for adopting the learning taxonomy and outcome-based education in any similar disciplines of educational programmes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education for the Future\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2347631119886403\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education for the Future\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631119886403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education for the Future","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631119886403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

任何大学和教育机构在其各个级别的课程中都不可避免地要宣布学习成果。它应该为所有课程制定一个通用计划,无论学科特点、个别课程甚至独立的教学单元如何。根据每个方案中采用的学习分类法,在不同级别上说明了这些结果。人们遵循不同的学习分类来陈述课程内容、设计评估项目和衡量成绩。在这项工作中,修订后的Bloom分类法(Anderson和Krathwohl,2001)被用作经典模型,以表达结果陈述和评估项目中的不同认知水平。这一点在国立大学和自治机构提供的80学分地质学研究生课程的基础上得到了证明。本文介绍了该课程三门课程的成果陈述和评估项目,即(a)生物地层学和古生物学、(b)变质岩石学和(c)结构地质学,这三门课程可以成为在任何类似学科的教育课程中采用学习分类学和基于成果的教育的理想样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geoscience Curriculum: Approach Through Learning Taxonomy and Outcome Based Education
Learning outcomes are inevitably to be declared by any university and educational institution at every level of their programmes. It should have a general scheme for all programmes regardless of the discipline specificities, individual courses or even independent instructional units. Such outcomes are stated at different levels based on the taxonomy of learning adopted in each scheme. People follow different learning taxonomies for stating course contents, designing the assessment items and measuring the attainment. In this work, revised Bloom’s taxonomy (Anderson and Krathwohl, 2001) has been adopted as a classic model to express different cognitive levels in outcome statements and assessment items. This has been demonstrated here based on an 80 credit postgraduate programme in geology offered by state universities and autonomous institutions. This article presents outcome statements and assessment items for three courses of the programme, namely (a) Biostratigraphy and Palaeontology, (b) Metamorphic Petrology and (c) Structural Geology, which can be ideal specimen for adopting the learning taxonomy and outcome-based education in any similar disciplines of educational programmes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education for the Future
Higher Education for the Future Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Reimagining English Language Teaching: Towards Developing a Heutagogical Framework The Use of Case Technology for the Formation of Information Competence for the Future Teachers of Mathematics The Content and Methodological Features of Professionally Oriented Training of Engineering Students in Higher Mathematics Higher Order Knowledge: The Challenge of Transmission Curriculum and Community with Research, Action and Service (CCBALwRAS), a Pedagogical Shift for Social Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1