{"title":"用统一方案建立强化治疗参与的安全性和稳定性:一个案例研究","authors":"M. Mian, B. Lin, J. M. Hormes, M. Earleywine","doi":"10.1177/1534650120952883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the vast array of empirically validated treatments for psychopathological problems, interventions still require considerable client resources for engagement and success. For clients lacking safety and stability outside of therapy, numerous barriers to treatment can prevent improvement and lead to disengagement. In such cases, therapists can seek to understand clients’ difficulties with safety and stability. Developing both rapport and the client’s problem-solving abilities can instill a sense of agency, keeping clients in treatment for better outcomes overall. This case study describes the modified application of the Unified Protocol following safety planning and crisis management. “Mary,” a 23-year old female, presented to a training clinic with fluctuating mood episodes, trauma symptoms, and problem substance use; pre, post, and routinely collected session data with clinical report indicate symptom improvement and increased treatment engagement following client gains in safety, employment, and housing. This case illustrates the importance of the therapeutic alliance in establishing client safety to effectively deliver a transdiagnostic treatment to address core mechanisms underlying emotion dysregulation.","PeriodicalId":46059,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Case Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"473 - 490"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1534650120952883","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing Safety and Stability for Enhanced Treatment Engagement With the Unified Protocol: A Case Study\",\"authors\":\"M. Mian, B. Lin, J. M. Hormes, M. Earleywine\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1534650120952883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the vast array of empirically validated treatments for psychopathological problems, interventions still require considerable client resources for engagement and success. For clients lacking safety and stability outside of therapy, numerous barriers to treatment can prevent improvement and lead to disengagement. In such cases, therapists can seek to understand clients’ difficulties with safety and stability. Developing both rapport and the client’s problem-solving abilities can instill a sense of agency, keeping clients in treatment for better outcomes overall. This case study describes the modified application of the Unified Protocol following safety planning and crisis management. “Mary,” a 23-year old female, presented to a training clinic with fluctuating mood episodes, trauma symptoms, and problem substance use; pre, post, and routinely collected session data with clinical report indicate symptom improvement and increased treatment engagement following client gains in safety, employment, and housing. This case illustrates the importance of the therapeutic alliance in establishing client safety to effectively deliver a transdiagnostic treatment to address core mechanisms underlying emotion dysregulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Case Studies\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"473 - 490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1534650120952883\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Case Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1534650120952883\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1534650120952883","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Establishing Safety and Stability for Enhanced Treatment Engagement With the Unified Protocol: A Case Study
Despite the vast array of empirically validated treatments for psychopathological problems, interventions still require considerable client resources for engagement and success. For clients lacking safety and stability outside of therapy, numerous barriers to treatment can prevent improvement and lead to disengagement. In such cases, therapists can seek to understand clients’ difficulties with safety and stability. Developing both rapport and the client’s problem-solving abilities can instill a sense of agency, keeping clients in treatment for better outcomes overall. This case study describes the modified application of the Unified Protocol following safety planning and crisis management. “Mary,” a 23-year old female, presented to a training clinic with fluctuating mood episodes, trauma symptoms, and problem substance use; pre, post, and routinely collected session data with clinical report indicate symptom improvement and increased treatment engagement following client gains in safety, employment, and housing. This case illustrates the importance of the therapeutic alliance in establishing client safety to effectively deliver a transdiagnostic treatment to address core mechanisms underlying emotion dysregulation.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Case Studies seeks manuscripts that articulate various theoretical frameworks. All manuscripts will require an abstract and must adhere to the following format: (1) Theoretical and Research Basis, (2) Case Introduction, (3) Presenting Complaints, (4) History, (5) Assessment, (6) Case Conceptualization (this is where the clinician"s thinking and treatment selection come to the forefront), (7) Course of Treatment and Assessment of Progress, (8) Complicating Factors (including medical management), (9) Managed Care Considerations (if any), (10) Follow-up (how and how long), (11) Treatment Implications of the Case, (12) Recommendations to Clinicians and Students, and References.