美国系统中立法体系和司法基础设施之间的竞争。与欧洲场景相比的效果和差异。

D. Liakopoulos
{"title":"美国系统中立法体系和司法基础设施之间的竞争。与欧洲场景相比的效果和差异。","authors":"D. Liakopoulos","doi":"10.5354/0718-4735.2019.53778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present investigation focuses on the analysis of competition between US laws, where the competitive system among the 50 States has been in force for more than a century, and aims to highlight areas of uniformity and differences with respect to the European model. Among the latter, particular weight is given to the absence of US federal corporate models, which goes hand in hand with the constant choice of specific states historically \"favorable\" to the establishment of corporate entities, such as Delaware, which are particularly appealing to individuals, also thanks to the establishment of sophisticated judicial infrastructures that see the presence of highly specialized courts, competent to settle disputes only in corporate matters.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"6 1","pages":"27-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPETITION BETWEEN LEGISLATIVE SYSTEMS AND JUDICIAL INFRASTRUCTURES IN THE US SYSTEM. EFFECTS AND DIFFERENCES COMPARED TO THE EUROPEAN SCENE.\",\"authors\":\"D. Liakopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.5354/0718-4735.2019.53778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present investigation focuses on the analysis of competition between US laws, where the competitive system among the 50 States has been in force for more than a century, and aims to highlight areas of uniformity and differences with respect to the European model. Among the latter, particular weight is given to the absence of US federal corporate models, which goes hand in hand with the constant choice of specific states historically \\\"favorable\\\" to the establishment of corporate entities, such as Delaware, which are particularly appealing to individuals, also thanks to the establishment of sophisticated judicial infrastructures that see the presence of highly specialized courts, competent to settle disputes only in corporate matters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"27-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2019.53778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2019.53778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本调查的重点是分析美国法律之间的竞争,50个国家之间的竞争制度已经实施了一个多世纪,旨在强调与欧洲模式相比的一致性和差异性。在后者中,特别重视美国联邦企业模式的缺失,这与不断选择历史上“有利于”建立企业实体的特定州密切相关,如特拉华州,这些州对个人特别有吸引力,还得益于建立了完善的司法基础设施,有高度专业化的法院,只负责解决公司事务中的纠纷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPETITION BETWEEN LEGISLATIVE SYSTEMS AND JUDICIAL INFRASTRUCTURES IN THE US SYSTEM. EFFECTS AND DIFFERENCES COMPARED TO THE EUROPEAN SCENE.
The present investigation focuses on the analysis of competition between US laws, where the competitive system among the 50 States has been in force for more than a century, and aims to highlight areas of uniformity and differences with respect to the European model. Among the latter, particular weight is given to the absence of US federal corporate models, which goes hand in hand with the constant choice of specific states historically "favorable" to the establishment of corporate entities, such as Delaware, which are particularly appealing to individuals, also thanks to the establishment of sophisticated judicial infrastructures that see the presence of highly specialized courts, competent to settle disputes only in corporate matters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
La sustracción de cosas corporales informes. El caso del agua, la electricidad y el gas Aproximaciones teóricas para una explicación de la violencia carcelaria interpersonal: un debate pendiente en el sistema penitenciario chileno Consideraciones acerca del tratamiento del error de prohibición en la jurisprudencia chilena ¿Es necesario un acuerdo en la coautoría? Una revisión crítica de acuerdo con la teoría de la acción El bien jurídico protegido como límite -aún posible- entre el derecho penal y el derecho administrativo sancionador: Reflexiones desde el derecho penal económico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1