复种、耕作和氮肥对土壤CO2和CH4排放的影响

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2023.108758
Jesús Fernández-Ortega , Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes , Carlos Cantero-Martínez
{"title":"复种、耕作和氮肥对土壤CO2和CH4排放的影响","authors":"Jesús Fernández-Ortega ,&nbsp;Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes ,&nbsp;Carlos Cantero-Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2023.108758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Double-cropping is increasingly embraced for its economic advantages in irrigated crops within the Ebro Valley region. However, the implications of this practice for soil carbon dioxide (CO</span><sub>2</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions remain poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the impact of legume-maize double-cropping on soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub><span><span> emissions and to identify optimal tillage systems and nitrogen fertilization rates for enhancing soil carbon budget. Conducted in Agramunt (NE Spain), the research transformed a long-term tillage and nitrogen fertilization field experiment initiated in 1996 under rainfed conditions. It transitioned into a maize monocrop system in 2015 and a diversification experiment in 2018. Maize monocrop was compared to a legume-maize double-cropping with two tillage systems (conventional tillage and no-tillage) and three mineral nitrogen fertilization rates (zero, medium and high). The legumes used were pea for grain (2019), </span>vetch<span> for green manure (2020) and vetch for forage (2021). The use of legumes in the double-cropping system had a significant impact on CO</span></span><sub>2</sub> fluxes. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the double-cropping ranged from 250 to 8070 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-C m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>, while in the monocropping, the fluxes were in the range of 150–5790 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-C m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup><span>. Due to the higher biomass production and extended crop cycle in the double-cropping, along with increased residue decomposition due to the higher amount of residue provided, the cumulative CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions were higher in the double-cropping. Within the double-cropping, the response of cumulative soil CO<sub>2</sub><span> emissions to tillage depended on the legume used and residue management. For legumes with a low nitrogen content, conventional tillage resulted in lower cumulative CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> emissions, while for legumes with a high nitrogen content, the lowest emissions were observed in the no-tillage system. The increased incorporation of crop residues in the combined approach of double-cropping and no-tillage led to a greater net ecosystem carbon budget, reaching 1960 kg C ha</span><sup>−1</sup>. However, the use of high or medium nitrogen fertilization rates did not have a significant impact on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions or the net ecosystem carbon budget. Cumulative soil CH<sub>4</sub><span> emissions were only affected by soil tillage in 2019 and 2021, with greater net CH</span><sub>4</sub> uptake under no-tillage compared with conventional tillage. This work underlines the importance of using legume-maize double-cropping together with no-tillage and N fertilization reduction to control the soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emission yields, while maintaining crop yields under Mediterranean conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"359 ","pages":"Article 108758"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double-cropping, tillage and nitrogen fertilization effects on soil CO2 and CH4 emissions\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Fernández-Ortega ,&nbsp;Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes ,&nbsp;Carlos Cantero-Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agee.2023.108758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Double-cropping is increasingly embraced for its economic advantages in irrigated crops within the Ebro Valley region. However, the implications of this practice for soil carbon dioxide (CO</span><sub>2</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions remain poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the impact of legume-maize double-cropping on soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub><span><span> emissions and to identify optimal tillage systems and nitrogen fertilization rates for enhancing soil carbon budget. Conducted in Agramunt (NE Spain), the research transformed a long-term tillage and nitrogen fertilization field experiment initiated in 1996 under rainfed conditions. It transitioned into a maize monocrop system in 2015 and a diversification experiment in 2018. Maize monocrop was compared to a legume-maize double-cropping with two tillage systems (conventional tillage and no-tillage) and three mineral nitrogen fertilization rates (zero, medium and high). The legumes used were pea for grain (2019), </span>vetch<span> for green manure (2020) and vetch for forage (2021). The use of legumes in the double-cropping system had a significant impact on CO</span></span><sub>2</sub> fluxes. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the double-cropping ranged from 250 to 8070 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-C m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>, while in the monocropping, the fluxes were in the range of 150–5790 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-C m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup><span>. Due to the higher biomass production and extended crop cycle in the double-cropping, along with increased residue decomposition due to the higher amount of residue provided, the cumulative CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions were higher in the double-cropping. Within the double-cropping, the response of cumulative soil CO<sub>2</sub><span> emissions to tillage depended on the legume used and residue management. For legumes with a low nitrogen content, conventional tillage resulted in lower cumulative CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> emissions, while for legumes with a high nitrogen content, the lowest emissions were observed in the no-tillage system. The increased incorporation of crop residues in the combined approach of double-cropping and no-tillage led to a greater net ecosystem carbon budget, reaching 1960 kg C ha</span><sup>−1</sup>. However, the use of high or medium nitrogen fertilization rates did not have a significant impact on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions or the net ecosystem carbon budget. Cumulative soil CH<sub>4</sub><span> emissions were only affected by soil tillage in 2019 and 2021, with greater net CH</span><sub>4</sub> uptake under no-tillage compared with conventional tillage. This work underlines the importance of using legume-maize double-cropping together with no-tillage and N fertilization reduction to control the soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emission yields, while maintaining crop yields under Mediterranean conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"volume\":\"359 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108758\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880923004176\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880923004176","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在埃布罗河谷地区,双季种植因其灌溉作物的经济优势而越来越受到欢迎。然而,这种做法对土壤二氧化碳(CO2)和甲烷(CH4)排放的影响仍知之甚少。本研究旨在评估豆类玉米双季种植对土壤CO2和CH4排放的影响,并确定提高土壤碳预算的最佳耕作制度和氮肥施用率。这项研究在阿格拉蒙特(西班牙东北部)进行,改变了1996年在降雨条件下开始的长期耕作和氮肥田间试验。它于2015年过渡到玉米单作系统,并于2018年进行多样化试验。将玉米单作与采用两种耕作制度(常规耕作和免耕)和三种矿物氮施肥率(零、中、高)的豆类玉米双季进行了比较。使用的豆类是用作谷物的豌豆(2019年)、用作绿肥的兽医(2020年)和用作饲料的兽医(2021年)。双季种植制度中豆类的使用对二氧化碳通量产生了重大影响。双季CO2排放量在250至8070 mg CO2-C m−2 d−1之间,而单作的通量在150至5790 mg CO2-C m−1之间。由于双季生物量产量较高,作物周期延长,加上提供的残渣量较高,残渣分解增加,双季累计二氧化碳排放量较高。在双季种植中,土壤CO2累积排放对耕作的反应取决于所使用的豆类和残留物管理。对于氮含量低的豆类,传统耕作导致二氧化碳累积排放量较低,而对于氮含量高的豆类,在免耕系统中观察到的排放量最低。在双季和免耕相结合的方法中,作物残留物的掺入增加了生态系统的净碳预算,达到1960公斤C ha−1。然而,高氮或中等氮施肥率的使用对二氧化碳排放或生态系统净碳预算没有显著影响。2019年和2021年,累积土壤CH4排放仅受土壤耕作的影响,与传统耕作相比,免耕下的CH4净吸收量更大。这项工作强调了在地中海条件下使用豆类玉米双季、免耕和减少氮肥的重要性,以控制土壤CO2和CH4排放量,同时保持作物产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Double-cropping, tillage and nitrogen fertilization effects on soil CO2 and CH4 emissions

Double-cropping is increasingly embraced for its economic advantages in irrigated crops within the Ebro Valley region. However, the implications of this practice for soil carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions remain poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the impact of legume-maize double-cropping on soil CO2 and CH4 emissions and to identify optimal tillage systems and nitrogen fertilization rates for enhancing soil carbon budget. Conducted in Agramunt (NE Spain), the research transformed a long-term tillage and nitrogen fertilization field experiment initiated in 1996 under rainfed conditions. It transitioned into a maize monocrop system in 2015 and a diversification experiment in 2018. Maize monocrop was compared to a legume-maize double-cropping with two tillage systems (conventional tillage and no-tillage) and three mineral nitrogen fertilization rates (zero, medium and high). The legumes used were pea for grain (2019), vetch for green manure (2020) and vetch for forage (2021). The use of legumes in the double-cropping system had a significant impact on CO2 fluxes. CO2 emissions in the double-cropping ranged from 250 to 8070 mg CO2-C m−2 day−1, while in the monocropping, the fluxes were in the range of 150–5790 mg CO2-C m−2 day−1. Due to the higher biomass production and extended crop cycle in the double-cropping, along with increased residue decomposition due to the higher amount of residue provided, the cumulative CO2 emissions were higher in the double-cropping. Within the double-cropping, the response of cumulative soil CO2 emissions to tillage depended on the legume used and residue management. For legumes with a low nitrogen content, conventional tillage resulted in lower cumulative CO2 emissions, while for legumes with a high nitrogen content, the lowest emissions were observed in the no-tillage system. The increased incorporation of crop residues in the combined approach of double-cropping and no-tillage led to a greater net ecosystem carbon budget, reaching 1960 kg C ha−1. However, the use of high or medium nitrogen fertilization rates did not have a significant impact on CO2 emissions or the net ecosystem carbon budget. Cumulative soil CH4 emissions were only affected by soil tillage in 2019 and 2021, with greater net CH4 uptake under no-tillage compared with conventional tillage. This work underlines the importance of using legume-maize double-cropping together with no-tillage and N fertilization reduction to control the soil CO2 and CH4 emission yields, while maintaining crop yields under Mediterranean conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Agricultural land use modulates responses of soil biota and multifunctionality to increased antibiotic pressures Temperate grasslands under climate extremes: Effects of plant diversity on ecosystem services Phosphorus leaching in high-P soils under maize silage and interseeding cover crop system Trade-offs and synergies of food-water-land benefits for crop rotation optimization in Northeast China Water and sediment regulation eluting and washland planting lead to nitrogen increase in the lower reaches of the Yellow River
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1