你已经接受了事实核查!检查社交媒体事实核查对错误信息传播的有效性

Ben Wasike
{"title":"你已经接受了事实核查!检查社交媒体事实核查对错误信息传播的有效性","authors":"Ben Wasike","doi":"10.1016/j.teler.2023.100090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using a random sample of active social media users (<em>N</em> = 1,156), this study examined the effectiveness of social media fact-checking against online misinformation sharing. Data indicates that these fact-checks are minimally effective in stopping the spread of misinformation on social media. Being aware of the fact-checks, being fact-checked, or even having content deleted from one's account were not deterrents to sharing misinformation. The fear of isolation was the strongest deterrent, suggesting that account freezes, suspensions, or bans were the most effective ways to curtail the spread of misinformation. The study contributes to research on fact-checking, to research on online surveillance, and to research on online expression and the spiral of silence theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101213,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"You've been fact-checked! Examining the effectiveness of social media fact-checking against the spread of misinformation\",\"authors\":\"Ben Wasike\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teler.2023.100090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using a random sample of active social media users (<em>N</em> = 1,156), this study examined the effectiveness of social media fact-checking against online misinformation sharing. Data indicates that these fact-checks are minimally effective in stopping the spread of misinformation on social media. Being aware of the fact-checks, being fact-checked, or even having content deleted from one's account were not deterrents to sharing misinformation. The fear of isolation was the strongest deterrent, suggesting that account freezes, suspensions, or bans were the most effective ways to curtail the spread of misinformation. The study contributes to research on fact-checking, to research on online surveillance, and to research on online expression and the spiral of silence theory.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics Reports\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503023000506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503023000506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用活跃社交媒体用户的随机样本(N=1156),检验了社交媒体事实核查对在线错误信息共享的有效性。数据表明,这些事实核查在阻止社交媒体上的错误信息传播方面收效甚微。意识到事实核查、被事实核查,甚至从自己的账户中删除内容,都不能阻止分享错误信息。对孤立的恐惧是最有力的威慑,这表明冻结、暂停或禁止账户是遏制错误信息传播的最有效方法。该研究有助于事实核查研究、在线监控研究、在线表达和沉默螺旋理论研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
You've been fact-checked! Examining the effectiveness of social media fact-checking against the spread of misinformation

Using a random sample of active social media users (N = 1,156), this study examined the effectiveness of social media fact-checking against online misinformation sharing. Data indicates that these fact-checks are minimally effective in stopping the spread of misinformation on social media. Being aware of the fact-checks, being fact-checked, or even having content deleted from one's account were not deterrents to sharing misinformation. The fear of isolation was the strongest deterrent, suggesting that account freezes, suspensions, or bans were the most effective ways to curtail the spread of misinformation. The study contributes to research on fact-checking, to research on online surveillance, and to research on online expression and the spiral of silence theory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on smart city construction in the context of public culture Multitasking Moose Migration: Examining media multimodality in slow-TV nature programming Factors influencing intentions to use QRIS: A two-staged PLS-SEM and ANN approach Copula entropy regularization transformer with C2 variational autoencoder and fine-tuned hybrid DL model for network intrusion detection Designing mobile-based tele dermatology for Indonesian clinic using user centred design: Quantitative and qualitative approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1