从童年到青年的社会经济地位和执行功能:来自智利圣地亚哥的证据

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 Medicine Advances in Life Course Research Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100546
Erin Delker , Sheila Gahagan , Raquel Burrows , Paulina Burrows-Correa , Patricia East , Betsy Lozoff , Estela Blanco
{"title":"从童年到青年的社会经济地位和执行功能:来自智利圣地亚哥的证据","authors":"Erin Delker ,&nbsp;Sheila Gahagan ,&nbsp;Raquel Burrows ,&nbsp;Paulina Burrows-Correa ,&nbsp;Patricia East ,&nbsp;Betsy Lozoff ,&nbsp;Estela Blanco","doi":"10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Optimizing cognitive development through early adulthood has implications for population health. This study aims to understand how socioeconomic position (SEP) across development relates to executive functioning. We evaluate three frameworks in life-course epidemiology – the sensitive period, accumulation, and social mobility hypotheses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants were young adults from Santiago, Chile who were studied from 6 months to 21 years. Family SEP was measured at ages 1 y, 10 y, and 16 y with the modified Graffar Index. Executive functioning was assessed at ages 16 y and 21 y by the Trail Making Test<span> Part B (Trails B). Analyses estimating 16 y and 21 y executive function involved 581 and 469 participants, respectively. Trails B scores were modeled as a function of SEP at 1 y, 10 y, and 16 y, as the total accumulation of disadvantage, and as change in SEP between 1 y and 10 y and between 10 y and 16 y.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants were low- to middle-income in infancy and, on average, experienced upwards mobility across childhood. Half of participants (58%) improved Trails B scores from 16 y and 21 y. Most (68%) experienced upward social mobility between infancy and 16 y. When examined independently, worse SEP measured at 10 y and 16 y related to worse (longer time to complete) Trails B scores at Age 21 but did not relate to the other outcomes. After mutual adjustment as a test of the sensitivity hypothesis, no SEP measure was independently related to any outcome. Testing the accumulation hypothesis, cumulative low SEP was associated with worse cognitive performance at 21 y (β = 3.6, p = 0.04). Results for the social mobility hypothesis showed no relation to cognitive scores or to change in cognitive scores. Comparing all hypotheses, SEP at 16 y explained the most variability in executive functioning at 21 y, providing support for the sensitive period hypothesis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results indicate that experiencing cumulatively low socioeconomic position from infancy to adolescence can have a negative impact on cognitive functioning in young adulthood. Findings also provide evidence in support of adolescence as a key developmental period during which SEP can most strongly impact cognitive functioning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47126,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Life Course Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic position and executive functioning from childhood to young adulthood: Evidence from Santiago, Chile\",\"authors\":\"Erin Delker ,&nbsp;Sheila Gahagan ,&nbsp;Raquel Burrows ,&nbsp;Paulina Burrows-Correa ,&nbsp;Patricia East ,&nbsp;Betsy Lozoff ,&nbsp;Estela Blanco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Optimizing cognitive development through early adulthood has implications for population health. This study aims to understand how socioeconomic position (SEP) across development relates to executive functioning. We evaluate three frameworks in life-course epidemiology – the sensitive period, accumulation, and social mobility hypotheses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants were young adults from Santiago, Chile who were studied from 6 months to 21 years. Family SEP was measured at ages 1 y, 10 y, and 16 y with the modified Graffar Index. Executive functioning was assessed at ages 16 y and 21 y by the Trail Making Test<span> Part B (Trails B). Analyses estimating 16 y and 21 y executive function involved 581 and 469 participants, respectively. Trails B scores were modeled as a function of SEP at 1 y, 10 y, and 16 y, as the total accumulation of disadvantage, and as change in SEP between 1 y and 10 y and between 10 y and 16 y.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants were low- to middle-income in infancy and, on average, experienced upwards mobility across childhood. Half of participants (58%) improved Trails B scores from 16 y and 21 y. Most (68%) experienced upward social mobility between infancy and 16 y. When examined independently, worse SEP measured at 10 y and 16 y related to worse (longer time to complete) Trails B scores at Age 21 but did not relate to the other outcomes. After mutual adjustment as a test of the sensitivity hypothesis, no SEP measure was independently related to any outcome. Testing the accumulation hypothesis, cumulative low SEP was associated with worse cognitive performance at 21 y (β = 3.6, p = 0.04). Results for the social mobility hypothesis showed no relation to cognitive scores or to change in cognitive scores. Comparing all hypotheses, SEP at 16 y explained the most variability in executive functioning at 21 y, providing support for the sensitive period hypothesis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results indicate that experiencing cumulatively low socioeconomic position from infancy to adolescence can have a negative impact on cognitive functioning in young adulthood. Findings also provide evidence in support of adolescence as a key developmental period during which SEP can most strongly impact cognitive functioning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Life Course Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Life Course Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040260823000217\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Life Course Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040260823000217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景优化成年早期的认知发展对人群健康有影响。本研究旨在了解整个发展过程中的社会经济地位(SEP)与执行功能之间的关系。我们评估了生命过程流行病学的三个框架——敏感期、积累和社会流动假设。方法参与者是来自智利圣地亚哥的年轻人,他们接受了6个月至21岁的研究。在1岁、10岁和16岁时用改良的Graffar指数测量家庭SEP。执行功能在16岁和21岁时通过试验B部分(试验B)进行评估。估计16岁和21岁执行功能的分析分别涉及581名和469名参与者。轨迹B得分被建模为1岁、10岁和16岁时SEP的函数,作为劣势的总积累,以及1岁至10岁以及10岁至16岁之间SEP的变化。一半的参与者(58%)从16岁到21岁提高了轨迹B的分数。大多数人(68%)在婴儿期至16岁之间经历了向上的社会流动。独立检查时,在10岁和16岁时测得的SEP较差与21岁时较差(完成时间较长)的Trails B评分有关,但与其他结果无关。在对敏感性假设进行相互调整后,没有SEP测量与任何结果独立相关。检验累积假说,累积低SEP与21岁时的认知表现较差有关(β=3.6,p=0.04)。社会流动假说的结果显示,与认知得分或认知得分变化无关。比较所有假设,16岁时的SEP解释了21岁时执行功能的最大可变性,为敏感期假设提供了支持。结论研究结果表明,从婴儿期到青春期经历累积的低社会经济地位会对青年期的认知功能产生负面影响。研究结果还提供了证据,支持青春期是SEP对认知功能影响最大的关键发育期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Socioeconomic position and executive functioning from childhood to young adulthood: Evidence from Santiago, Chile

Background

Optimizing cognitive development through early adulthood has implications for population health. This study aims to understand how socioeconomic position (SEP) across development relates to executive functioning. We evaluate three frameworks in life-course epidemiology – the sensitive period, accumulation, and social mobility hypotheses.

Methods

Participants were young adults from Santiago, Chile who were studied from 6 months to 21 years. Family SEP was measured at ages 1 y, 10 y, and 16 y with the modified Graffar Index. Executive functioning was assessed at ages 16 y and 21 y by the Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B). Analyses estimating 16 y and 21 y executive function involved 581 and 469 participants, respectively. Trails B scores were modeled as a function of SEP at 1 y, 10 y, and 16 y, as the total accumulation of disadvantage, and as change in SEP between 1 y and 10 y and between 10 y and 16 y.

Results

Participants were low- to middle-income in infancy and, on average, experienced upwards mobility across childhood. Half of participants (58%) improved Trails B scores from 16 y and 21 y. Most (68%) experienced upward social mobility between infancy and 16 y. When examined independently, worse SEP measured at 10 y and 16 y related to worse (longer time to complete) Trails B scores at Age 21 but did not relate to the other outcomes. After mutual adjustment as a test of the sensitivity hypothesis, no SEP measure was independently related to any outcome. Testing the accumulation hypothesis, cumulative low SEP was associated with worse cognitive performance at 21 y (β = 3.6, p = 0.04). Results for the social mobility hypothesis showed no relation to cognitive scores or to change in cognitive scores. Comparing all hypotheses, SEP at 16 y explained the most variability in executive functioning at 21 y, providing support for the sensitive period hypothesis.

Conclusions

Results indicate that experiencing cumulatively low socioeconomic position from infancy to adolescence can have a negative impact on cognitive functioning in young adulthood. Findings also provide evidence in support of adolescence as a key developmental period during which SEP can most strongly impact cognitive functioning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Life Course Research
Advances in Life Course Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Advances in Life Course Research publishes articles dealing with various aspects of the human life course. Seeing life course research as an essentially interdisciplinary field of study, it invites and welcomes contributions from anthropology, biosocial science, demography, epidemiology and statistics, gerontology, economics, management and organisation science, policy studies, psychology, research methodology and sociology. Original empirical analyses, theoretical contributions, methodological studies and reviews accessible to a broad set of readers are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Childhood poverty trajectories and trajectories of healthcare contacts in adolescence and young adulthood Complex nexus: Economic development, rural-to-urban migration, and transition to adulthood in China Editorial Board How the size and structure of egocentric networks change during a life transition The long-term consequences of school suspension and expulsion on depressive symptoms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1