创建一个“规划应急服务水平”框架——灵丹妙药,还是对打靶练习有用的东西?

R. Mowll , J. Becker , L. Wotherspoon , C. Stewart , D. Johnston , D. Neely
{"title":"创建一个“规划应急服务水平”框架——灵丹妙药,还是对打靶练习有用的东西?","authors":"R. Mowll ,&nbsp;J. Becker ,&nbsp;L. Wotherspoon ,&nbsp;C. Stewart ,&nbsp;D. Johnston ,&nbsp;D. Neely","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>‘Planning Emergency Levels of Service’ (PELOS) are service delivery goals for infrastructure providers during and after an emergency event. These goals could be delivered through the existing infrastructure (e.g., pipes, lines, cables), or through other means (trucked water or the provision of generators). This paper describes how an operationalised framework of PELOS for the Wellington region, New Zealand was created, alongside the key stakeholders. We undertook interviews and workshops with critical infrastructure entities to create the framework. Through this process we found five themes that informed the context and development of the PELOS framework: interdependencies between critical infrastructure, the need to consider the vulnerabilities of some community members, emergency planning considerations, stakeholders’ willingness to collaborate on this research/project and the flexibility/adaptability of the delivery of infrastructure services following a major event. These themes are all explored in this paper. This research finds that the understanding of the hazardscape and potential outages from hazards is critical and that co-ordination between key stakeholders is essential to create such a framework. This paper may be used to inform the production of PELOS frameworks in other localities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating a ‘planning emergency levels of service’ framework – a silver bullet, or something useful for target practice?\",\"authors\":\"R. Mowll ,&nbsp;J. Becker ,&nbsp;L. Wotherspoon ,&nbsp;C. Stewart ,&nbsp;D. Johnston ,&nbsp;D. Neely\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcns.2023.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>‘Planning Emergency Levels of Service’ (PELOS) are service delivery goals for infrastructure providers during and after an emergency event. These goals could be delivered through the existing infrastructure (e.g., pipes, lines, cables), or through other means (trucked water or the provision of generators). This paper describes how an operationalised framework of PELOS for the Wellington region, New Zealand was created, alongside the key stakeholders. We undertook interviews and workshops with critical infrastructure entities to create the framework. Through this process we found five themes that informed the context and development of the PELOS framework: interdependencies between critical infrastructure, the need to consider the vulnerabilities of some community members, emergency planning considerations, stakeholders’ willingness to collaborate on this research/project and the flexibility/adaptability of the delivery of infrastructure services following a major event. These themes are all explored in this paper. This research finds that the understanding of the hazardscape and potential outages from hazards is critical and that co-ordination between key stakeholders is essential to create such a framework. This paper may be used to inform the production of PELOS frameworks in other localities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resilient Cities and Structures\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resilient Cities and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741623000315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resilient Cities and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741623000315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“规划紧急服务水平”(PELOS)是基础设施提供商在紧急事件期间和之后的服务交付目标。这些目标可以通过现有的基础设施(如管道、线路、电缆)或其他方式(卡车运水或提供发电机)实现。本文描述了新西兰惠灵顿地区PELOS的运作框架是如何与主要利益相关者一起创建的。我们与关键基础设施实体进行了访谈和研讨会,以创建该框架。通过这一过程,我们发现了五个主题,这些主题为PELOS框架的背景和发展提供了信息:关键基础设施之间的相互依赖性、考虑一些社区成员脆弱性的必要性、应急规划考虑因素、,利益相关者在该研究/项目上合作的意愿,以及重大事件后基础设施服务交付的灵活性/适应性。本文对这些主题进行了探讨。这项研究发现,了解危险环境和潜在的危险中断至关重要,关键利益相关者之间的协调对于创建这样一个框架至关重要。本文可用于为其他地区的PELOS框架的生产提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creating a ‘planning emergency levels of service’ framework – a silver bullet, or something useful for target practice?

‘Planning Emergency Levels of Service’ (PELOS) are service delivery goals for infrastructure providers during and after an emergency event. These goals could be delivered through the existing infrastructure (e.g., pipes, lines, cables), or through other means (trucked water or the provision of generators). This paper describes how an operationalised framework of PELOS for the Wellington region, New Zealand was created, alongside the key stakeholders. We undertook interviews and workshops with critical infrastructure entities to create the framework. Through this process we found five themes that informed the context and development of the PELOS framework: interdependencies between critical infrastructure, the need to consider the vulnerabilities of some community members, emergency planning considerations, stakeholders’ willingness to collaborate on this research/project and the flexibility/adaptability of the delivery of infrastructure services following a major event. These themes are all explored in this paper. This research finds that the understanding of the hazardscape and potential outages from hazards is critical and that co-ordination between key stakeholders is essential to create such a framework. This paper may be used to inform the production of PELOS frameworks in other localities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated knowledge graphs for complex systems (AutoGraCS): Applications to management of bridge networks Uncovering implicit Seismogenic associated regions towards promoting urban resilience Building Stock and Emission Models for Jakarta Key networks to create disaster resilient Smart Cities Mission: A case for remodeling India's Smart Cities Mission to include disaster resilience Landslide-oriented disaster resilience evaluation in mountainous cities: A case study in Chongqing, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1