钢筋混凝土结构抗震加固干预措施评估

Naveen Avulapalle , Rajaram Chenna , Jayaprakash Vemuri
{"title":"钢筋混凝土结构抗震加固干预措施评估","authors":"Naveen Avulapalle ,&nbsp;Rajaram Chenna ,&nbsp;Jayaprakash Vemuri","doi":"10.1016/j.ghm.2023.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Destruction of reinforced concrete (RC) structures, particularly non-ductile RC structures, in recent earthquakes demonstrate their vulnerability under lateral forces generated in an earthquake. Despite the extensive literature on the subject and the wide variety of strengthening techniques available, there is no consensus on the efficiency of these techniques in improving the seismic performance of RC structures. In this study, a five-storeyed RC-framed building is considered to evaluate its seismic performance through static non-linear pushover analysis. To examine the effect of various cases encountered in practice, the pushover analysis is carried out on the RC frame for various cases, i.e. a bare RC frame, an RC frame with masonry infills but with an open ground storey, and RC frames with shear walls with a variety of thicknesses and steel reinforcement ratios. Further, to investigate the effect of retrofitting, the RC frame is strengthened using local jacketing and bracings. From the results, it is observed that the initial stiffness and base shear of masonry infilled RC frame with an open ground storey exhibit an increase of 2.6%, and 19%, respectively, as compared to the bare frame. The use of shear walls increases the initial stiffness and base shears, and they increase by 6–14% and 8–20%, respectively, with an increase in the reinforcement ratio in the shear wall. Retrofitting with the use of both diagonal bracings causes the base shear to increase by a factor of 7.7 as compared to that of the open ground storey. Finally, the probability of damage to the RC frame in all cases was compared using seismic fragility curves.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100580,"journal":{"name":"Geohazard Mechanics","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 194-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of seismic retrofitting interventions in reinforced concrete structures\",\"authors\":\"Naveen Avulapalle ,&nbsp;Rajaram Chenna ,&nbsp;Jayaprakash Vemuri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ghm.2023.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Destruction of reinforced concrete (RC) structures, particularly non-ductile RC structures, in recent earthquakes demonstrate their vulnerability under lateral forces generated in an earthquake. Despite the extensive literature on the subject and the wide variety of strengthening techniques available, there is no consensus on the efficiency of these techniques in improving the seismic performance of RC structures. In this study, a five-storeyed RC-framed building is considered to evaluate its seismic performance through static non-linear pushover analysis. To examine the effect of various cases encountered in practice, the pushover analysis is carried out on the RC frame for various cases, i.e. a bare RC frame, an RC frame with masonry infills but with an open ground storey, and RC frames with shear walls with a variety of thicknesses and steel reinforcement ratios. Further, to investigate the effect of retrofitting, the RC frame is strengthened using local jacketing and bracings. From the results, it is observed that the initial stiffness and base shear of masonry infilled RC frame with an open ground storey exhibit an increase of 2.6%, and 19%, respectively, as compared to the bare frame. The use of shear walls increases the initial stiffness and base shears, and they increase by 6–14% and 8–20%, respectively, with an increase in the reinforcement ratio in the shear wall. Retrofitting with the use of both diagonal bracings causes the base shear to increase by a factor of 7.7 as compared to that of the open ground storey. Finally, the probability of damage to the RC frame in all cases was compared using seismic fragility curves.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geohazard Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 194-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geohazard Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949741823000195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohazard Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949741823000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在最近的地震中,钢筋混凝土(RC)结构,特别是非延性RC结构的破坏表明它们在地震产生的侧向力下的脆弱性。尽管关于这一主题的大量文献和各种各样的加固技术可供使用,但这些技术在提高RC结构抗震性能方面的效率并没有达成共识。本文以一栋五层rc框架建筑为研究对象,通过静力非线性推覆分析对其抗震性能进行评价。为了检验实践中遇到的各种情况的影响,对各种情况下的RC框架进行了推覆分析,即裸RC框架,砌体填充但开放地面层的RC框架,以及具有各种厚度和钢筋配筋率的剪力墙的RC框架。此外,为了研究改造的效果,RC框架使用局部护套和支撑进行加固。结果表明,与裸框架相比,地面开放层砌筑混凝土框架的初始刚度和基础剪力分别增加2.6%和19%。随着剪力墙配筋率的增加,初始刚度和基础剪力分别增加了6-14%和8-20%。与开放的地面层相比,使用两个对角支撑的改造使基础剪力增加了7.7倍。最后,利用地震易损性曲线对所有情况下RC框架的损伤概率进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of seismic retrofitting interventions in reinforced concrete structures

Destruction of reinforced concrete (RC) structures, particularly non-ductile RC structures, in recent earthquakes demonstrate their vulnerability under lateral forces generated in an earthquake. Despite the extensive literature on the subject and the wide variety of strengthening techniques available, there is no consensus on the efficiency of these techniques in improving the seismic performance of RC structures. In this study, a five-storeyed RC-framed building is considered to evaluate its seismic performance through static non-linear pushover analysis. To examine the effect of various cases encountered in practice, the pushover analysis is carried out on the RC frame for various cases, i.e. a bare RC frame, an RC frame with masonry infills but with an open ground storey, and RC frames with shear walls with a variety of thicknesses and steel reinforcement ratios. Further, to investigate the effect of retrofitting, the RC frame is strengthened using local jacketing and bracings. From the results, it is observed that the initial stiffness and base shear of masonry infilled RC frame with an open ground storey exhibit an increase of 2.6%, and 19%, respectively, as compared to the bare frame. The use of shear walls increases the initial stiffness and base shears, and they increase by 6–14% and 8–20%, respectively, with an increase in the reinforcement ratio in the shear wall. Retrofitting with the use of both diagonal bracings causes the base shear to increase by a factor of 7.7 as compared to that of the open ground storey. Finally, the probability of damage to the RC frame in all cases was compared using seismic fragility curves.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Optimization design method of 2D+3D slope shape for landslide prevention in open-pit coal mine Stability prediction of roadway surrounding rock using INGO-RF Leveraging artificial neural networks for robust landslide susceptibility mapping: A geospatial modeling approach in the ecologically sensitive Nilgiri District, Tamil Nadu Prediction of coal and gas outburst hazard using kernel principal component analysis and an enhanced extreme learning machine approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1