对Ẓāhir和Bāṭ伊本·哈尔顿的《穆卡迪玛的历史》

0 ANTHROPOLOGY Sociology Lens Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI:10.1111/johs.12397
Lilian Abou-Tabickh
{"title":"对Ẓāhir和Bāṭ伊本·哈尔顿的《穆卡迪玛的历史》","authors":"Lilian Abou-Tabickh","doi":"10.1111/johs.12397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay offers a new interpretation of the terms <i>ẓāhir</i> and <i>bāṭin</i> in <i>Al</i>-<i>Muqaddima</i> based on Ibn Khaldun's philosophy of language and rhetorical style. It shows that the figurative phrase <i>fī bāṭinihi</i>, followed by the term <i>naẓar</i>, implies that <i>bāṭin</i> is where historians should look to verify their information. On this reading, <i>bāṭin</i> denotes human association and its “essential conditions”. The terms also imply that there is reason in the <i>bāṭin</i> of history. Polities are at the core of history and its study, and politics requires reason to conduct. In this context, <i>bāṭin</i> is the content and substance of history, which refers to political organization and the range of rational actions required for the management of society. The <i>ẓāhir</i> of history, on the other hand, refers to the expression where the conditions of speech need to conform to the conditions in human association. This interpretation underscores the role of choice in <i>Al-Muqaddima</i> and challenges the determinism prevalent in the secondary literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Reading of the Ẓāhir and Bāṭin of History in Al-Muqaddima by Ibn Khaldun\",\"authors\":\"Lilian Abou-Tabickh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/johs.12397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This essay offers a new interpretation of the terms <i>ẓāhir</i> and <i>bāṭin</i> in <i>Al</i>-<i>Muqaddima</i> based on Ibn Khaldun's philosophy of language and rhetorical style. It shows that the figurative phrase <i>fī bāṭinihi</i>, followed by the term <i>naẓar</i>, implies that <i>bāṭin</i> is where historians should look to verify their information. On this reading, <i>bāṭin</i> denotes human association and its “essential conditions”. The terms also imply that there is reason in the <i>bāṭin</i> of history. Polities are at the core of history and its study, and politics requires reason to conduct. In this context, <i>bāṭin</i> is the content and substance of history, which refers to political organization and the range of rational actions required for the management of society. The <i>ẓāhir</i> of history, on the other hand, refers to the expression where the conditions of speech need to conform to the conditions in human association. This interpretation underscores the role of choice in <i>Al-Muqaddima</i> and challenges the determinism prevalent in the secondary literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology Lens\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology Lens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/johs.12397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Lens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/johs.12397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章对这些术语作了新的解释ẓāhir和bāṭ在Al-Muqaddima中,基于伊本·哈尔顿的语言哲学和修辞风格。这表明比喻短语fībāṭinihi,后面跟着naẓar,意味着bāṭ历史学家应该在这里核实他们的信息。在这种解读中,bāṭin表示人的联想及其“必要条件”。这些术语还暗示了bāṭ在历史上。政治是历史及其研究的核心,政治需要理性。在这方面,bāṭin是历史的内容和实质,是指管理社会所需的政治组织和理性行动的范围。这个ẓ另一方面,历史的āhir是指言语条件需要符合人类交往条件的表达。这种解释强调了选择在《圣战》中的作用,并挑战了二级文学中普遍存在的决定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A New Reading of the Ẓāhir and Bāṭin of History in Al-Muqaddima by Ibn Khaldun

This essay offers a new interpretation of the terms ẓāhir and bāṭin in Al-Muqaddima based on Ibn Khaldun's philosophy of language and rhetorical style. It shows that the figurative phrase fī bāṭinihi, followed by the term naẓar, implies that bāṭin is where historians should look to verify their information. On this reading, bāṭin denotes human association and its “essential conditions”. The terms also imply that there is reason in the bāṭin of history. Polities are at the core of history and its study, and politics requires reason to conduct. In this context, bāṭin is the content and substance of history, which refers to political organization and the range of rational actions required for the management of society. The ẓāhir of history, on the other hand, refers to the expression where the conditions of speech need to conform to the conditions in human association. This interpretation underscores the role of choice in Al-Muqaddima and challenges the determinism prevalent in the secondary literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Sociological and Political Origins in IBN Khaldun's State Theory Making “Enemies”: Industry-State Subterfuge and US Fair Trade Practices Towards Non-Market Economies Since 1960 Public Discourse on the Israel-Hamas War 2023: A Comparative Analysis of Lithuania and the United Kingdom A Global Phenomenology of Whiteness: Turkey, Europe and Institutional Global Racism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1