{"title":"回应：大规模仲裁的不同方法，以及对州和联邦法院实践的影响","authors":"Maximilian Zorn","doi":"10.1002/alt.22002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mass arbitration has emerged following efforts by corporate employers to safeguard the enforceability of their employment and consumer arbitration provisions, and plaintiffs’ moves to pursue individual arbitration remedies in the face of court-backed mandatory employment arbitration programs that prohibit court cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":100074,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","volume":"41 6","pages":"87-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Response: Divergent Approaches to Mass Arbitration, and the Effect on Practice in State and Federal Courts\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Zorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alt.22002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mass arbitration has emerged following efforts by corporate employers to safeguard the enforceability of their employment and consumer arbitration provisions, and plaintiffs’ moves to pursue individual arbitration remedies in the face of court-backed mandatory employment arbitration programs that prohibit court cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"volume\":\"41 6\",\"pages\":\"87-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.22002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.22002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Response: Divergent Approaches to Mass Arbitration, and the Effect on Practice in State and Federal Courts
Mass arbitration has emerged following efforts by corporate employers to safeguard the enforceability of their employment and consumer arbitration provisions, and plaintiffs’ moves to pursue individual arbitration remedies in the face of court-backed mandatory employment arbitration programs that prohibit court cases.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
