没有不可能数据的可变重要性

IF 7.4 1区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1146/annurev-statistics-040722-045325
Masayoshi Mase, Art B. Owen, Benjamin B. Seiler
{"title":"没有不可能数据的可变重要性","authors":"Masayoshi Mase, Art B. Owen, Benjamin B. Seiler","doi":"10.1146/annurev-statistics-040722-045325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most popular methods for measuring importance of the variables in a black-box prediction algorithm make use of synthetic inputs that combine predictor variables from multiple observations. These inputs can be unlikely, physically impossible, or even logically impossible. As a result, the predictions for such cases can be based on data very unlike any the black box was trained on. We think that users cannot trust an explanation of the decision of a prediction algorithm when the explanation uses such values. Instead, we advocate a method called cohort Shapley, which is grounded in economic game theory and uses only actually observed data to quantify variable importance. Cohort Shapley works by narrowing the cohort of observations judged to be similar to a target observation on one or more features. We illustrate it on an algorithmic fairness problem where it is essential to attribute importance to protected variables that the model was not trained on.Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, Volume 11 is March 2024. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.","PeriodicalId":48855,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application","volume":"16 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variable Importance Without Impossible Data\",\"authors\":\"Masayoshi Mase, Art B. Owen, Benjamin B. Seiler\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-statistics-040722-045325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most popular methods for measuring importance of the variables in a black-box prediction algorithm make use of synthetic inputs that combine predictor variables from multiple observations. These inputs can be unlikely, physically impossible, or even logically impossible. As a result, the predictions for such cases can be based on data very unlike any the black box was trained on. We think that users cannot trust an explanation of the decision of a prediction algorithm when the explanation uses such values. Instead, we advocate a method called cohort Shapley, which is grounded in economic game theory and uses only actually observed data to quantify variable importance. Cohort Shapley works by narrowing the cohort of observations judged to be similar to a target observation on one or more features. We illustrate it on an algorithmic fairness problem where it is essential to attribute importance to protected variables that the model was not trained on.Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, Volume 11 is March 2024. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-040722-045325\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-040722-045325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在黑箱预测算法中,最常用的测量变量重要性的方法是使用综合输入,该输入结合了来自多个观测值的预测变量。这些输入可能不太可能,物理上不可能,甚至逻辑上不可能。因此,对此类案件的预测可以基于与黑匣子训练的数据非常不同的数据。我们认为,当解释使用这些值时,用户不能信任预测算法的决策解释。相反,我们提倡一种叫做队列沙普利(cohort Shapley)的方法,它以经济博弈论为基础,只使用实际观察到的数据来量化变量的重要性。队列Shapley的工作原理是缩小在一个或多个特征上被判断为与目标观察相似的观察队列。我们在一个算法公平问题上说明了这一点,在这个问题上,必须将模型未训练的受保护变量的重要性归因于此。预计《统计年鉴及其应用》第11卷的最终在线出版日期为2024年3月。修订后的估计数请参阅http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Variable Importance Without Impossible Data
The most popular methods for measuring importance of the variables in a black-box prediction algorithm make use of synthetic inputs that combine predictor variables from multiple observations. These inputs can be unlikely, physically impossible, or even logically impossible. As a result, the predictions for such cases can be based on data very unlike any the black box was trained on. We think that users cannot trust an explanation of the decision of a prediction algorithm when the explanation uses such values. Instead, we advocate a method called cohort Shapley, which is grounded in economic game theory and uses only actually observed data to quantify variable importance. Cohort Shapley works by narrowing the cohort of observations judged to be similar to a target observation on one or more features. We illustrate it on an algorithmic fairness problem where it is essential to attribute importance to protected variables that the model was not trained on.Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, Volume 11 is March 2024. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application publishes comprehensive review articles focusing on methodological advancements in statistics and the utilization of computational tools facilitating these advancements. It is abstracted and indexed in Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Inspec.
期刊最新文献
Models and Rating Systems for Head-to-Head Competition A Review of Reinforcement Learning in Financial Applications Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Survival Data Infectious Disease Modeling Empirical Likelihood in Functional Data Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1