尼日利亚西南部土壤物理力学性质在不同耕作和种植制度下的变化

Funke Florence Akinola , Johnson Toyin Fasinmirin , Olawale Olugbenga Olanrewaju , Babatunde Sunday Ewulo , Idowu Ezekiel Olorunfemi
{"title":"尼日利亚西南部土壤物理力学性质在不同耕作和种植制度下的变化","authors":"Funke Florence Akinola ,&nbsp;Johnson Toyin Fasinmirin ,&nbsp;Olawale Olugbenga Olanrewaju ,&nbsp;Babatunde Sunday Ewulo ,&nbsp;Idowu Ezekiel Olorunfemi","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable agricultural strategies such as conservation agriculture (CA) and integrated land management are required to mitigate land degradation and food insecurity. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of different cropping systems: sole sorghum (SOR), sole cowpea (COW), sole soybean (SOY), sorghum-cowpea intercrop (SC), and sorghum-soybean intercrop (SS); and tillage practices: conventional tillage (CT), no tillage (NT), and compacted no till (NTc) on physical and mechanical properties of an Alfisol in Southwestern Nigeria. The experimental layout comprised a split plot design accommodating the 3 tillage and 5 cropping systems in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Undisturbed soil samples were collected from 0 to 15 ​cm, and 15–30 ​cm soil layers for the determination of soil bulk density (BD), total porosity (TP), and unconfined compressive strength (<em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub>). The results showed that bulk density was lower, while total porosity was higher under intercrops than monocrops in all the tillage treatments. Conventional tillage had the least BD compared to no tillage and compacted no till plots. Soil vane shear strength (Ʈ) and unconfined compressive strength (<em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub>) were generally lower under the intercrops than the sole sorghum plots. Averaged over the two soil depths, the mean soil <em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub> of SS intercrop was 1.28 times lower than the mean soil <em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub> of SOR but was 1.06 times higher than the mean soil <em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub> of SOY. SC intercrop had a 14.20% and a 9.15% lower average soil <em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub> than SOR and COW in 2019. Unconfined compressive strength and vanes shear strength significantly positively correlated with BD and negatively with TP, organic carbon (OC), organic matter (OM), and total nitrogen (N) in both cropping years. The research demonstrates that farming approaches that integrate soil cover preservation and minimal soil disturbance with diverse cropping systems improve soil physical and mechanical behavior.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in soil physical and mechanical properties under different tillage and cropping systems in alfisol soil of southwestern Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Funke Florence Akinola ,&nbsp;Johnson Toyin Fasinmirin ,&nbsp;Olawale Olugbenga Olanrewaju ,&nbsp;Babatunde Sunday Ewulo ,&nbsp;Idowu Ezekiel Olorunfemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sustainable agricultural strategies such as conservation agriculture (CA) and integrated land management are required to mitigate land degradation and food insecurity. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of different cropping systems: sole sorghum (SOR), sole cowpea (COW), sole soybean (SOY), sorghum-cowpea intercrop (SC), and sorghum-soybean intercrop (SS); and tillage practices: conventional tillage (CT), no tillage (NT), and compacted no till (NTc) on physical and mechanical properties of an Alfisol in Southwestern Nigeria. The experimental layout comprised a split plot design accommodating the 3 tillage and 5 cropping systems in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Undisturbed soil samples were collected from 0 to 15 ​cm, and 15–30 ​cm soil layers for the determination of soil bulk density (BD), total porosity (TP), and unconfined compressive strength (<em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub>). The results showed that bulk density was lower, while total porosity was higher under intercrops than monocrops in all the tillage treatments. Conventional tillage had the least BD compared to no tillage and compacted no till plots. Soil vane shear strength (Ʈ) and unconfined compressive strength (<em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub>) were generally lower under the intercrops than the sole sorghum plots. Averaged over the two soil depths, the mean soil <em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub> of SS intercrop was 1.28 times lower than the mean soil <em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub> of SOR but was 1.06 times higher than the mean soil <em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub> of SOY. SC intercrop had a 14.20% and a 9.15% lower average soil <em>q</em><sub><em>u</em>f</sub> than SOR and COW in 2019. Unconfined compressive strength and vanes shear strength significantly positively correlated with BD and negatively with TP, organic carbon (OC), organic matter (OM), and total nitrogen (N) in both cropping years. The research demonstrates that farming approaches that integrate soil cover preservation and minimal soil disturbance with diverse cropping systems improve soil physical and mechanical behavior.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farming System\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farming System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

需要可持续农业战略,如保护性农业和综合土地管理,以缓解土地退化和粮食不安全。本研究旨在研究不同种植制度的影响:高粱(SOR)、豇豆(COW)、大豆(SOY)、高粱-豇豆间作(SC)和高粱-大豆间作(SS);以及耕作实践:常规耕作(CT)、免耕(NT)和压实免耕(NTc)对尼日利亚西南部Alfisol物理和机械性能的影响。试验布局包括一个分块设计,以三次重复的随机完全块设计容纳3种耕作和5种种植系统。0至15日采集了未扰动土壤样本​厘米和15-30​cm土层,用于测定土壤容重(BD)、总孔隙度(TP)和无侧限抗压强度(quf)。结果表明,在所有耕作处理中,间作土壤容重较低,总孔隙度较高。与免耕和压实免耕相比,常规耕作的BD最少。间作下的土壤叶片剪切强度(Ʈ)和无侧限抗压强度(quf)通常低于单独的高粱地。在两个土壤深度上平均,SS间作的平均土壤质量是SOR平均土壤质量的1.28倍,但比SOY平均土壤质量高1.06倍。2019年,SC间作的平均土壤质量比SOR和COW分别低14.20%和9.15%。无侧限抗压强度和叶片剪切强度与BD呈正相关,与TP、有机碳(OC)、有机质(OM)和总氮(N)呈负相关。研究表明,将土壤覆盖保护和最小土壤干扰与不同种植制度相结合的耕作方法可以改善土壤的物理和力学行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in soil physical and mechanical properties under different tillage and cropping systems in alfisol soil of southwestern Nigeria

Sustainable agricultural strategies such as conservation agriculture (CA) and integrated land management are required to mitigate land degradation and food insecurity. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of different cropping systems: sole sorghum (SOR), sole cowpea (COW), sole soybean (SOY), sorghum-cowpea intercrop (SC), and sorghum-soybean intercrop (SS); and tillage practices: conventional tillage (CT), no tillage (NT), and compacted no till (NTc) on physical and mechanical properties of an Alfisol in Southwestern Nigeria. The experimental layout comprised a split plot design accommodating the 3 tillage and 5 cropping systems in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Undisturbed soil samples were collected from 0 to 15 ​cm, and 15–30 ​cm soil layers for the determination of soil bulk density (BD), total porosity (TP), and unconfined compressive strength (quf). The results showed that bulk density was lower, while total porosity was higher under intercrops than monocrops in all the tillage treatments. Conventional tillage had the least BD compared to no tillage and compacted no till plots. Soil vane shear strength (Ʈ) and unconfined compressive strength (quf) were generally lower under the intercrops than the sole sorghum plots. Averaged over the two soil depths, the mean soil quf of SS intercrop was 1.28 times lower than the mean soil quf of SOR but was 1.06 times higher than the mean soil quf of SOY. SC intercrop had a 14.20% and a 9.15% lower average soil quf than SOR and COW in 2019. Unconfined compressive strength and vanes shear strength significantly positively correlated with BD and negatively with TP, organic carbon (OC), organic matter (OM), and total nitrogen (N) in both cropping years. The research demonstrates that farming approaches that integrate soil cover preservation and minimal soil disturbance with diverse cropping systems improve soil physical and mechanical behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the performance of biobased, recovered nitrogen fertilizers in European cropping systems using modelling Multicriteria assessment of recently implemented conservation agriculture cropping systems across farmers’ plots in northwestern Cambodia How has scientific literature addressed crop planning at farm level: A bibliometric-qualitative review Spatiotemporal variation of crop diversification across Eastern Indo Gangetic plains of South Asia Perennial rice – An alternative to the ‘one-sow, one-harvest’ rice production: Benefits, challenges, and future prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1