借记卡交换费监管的实证分析——来自巴西的证据

Daniel Tavares de Castro , Emerson Erik Schmitz , Monique de Abreu Azevedo
{"title":"借记卡交换费监管的实证分析——来自巴西的证据","authors":"Daniel Tavares de Castro ,&nbsp;Emerson Erik Schmitz ,&nbsp;Monique de Abreu Azevedo","doi":"10.1016/j.latcb.2022.100078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents an empirical analysis of the introduction, in October 2018, of maximum thresholds (“caps”) on debit card interchange fees for domestic payment cards in Brazil. We investigate the behavior of card issuers’ revenues from debit and credit card interchange fees, the merchant discount rate (MDR) of debit transactions, debit and credit card usage, and debit card scheme fees paid by card issuers and acquirers after the cap. We find a gradual and increasing reduction in the MDR, from 6.0% in 2018Q4 to 22.8% in 2020Q1. Additionally, we observe a statistically significant difference between debit and credit card MDR in 2019Q4 and 2020Q1. The cap reduces card issuers’ earnings from the debit card interchange fee proportionally to the cut but does not affect similar revenues from credit cards. Overall, there is no evidence that the regulation of the debit card interchange fee changes the dynamics of debit card usage or that it changes debit card scheme fees.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100867,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical analysis of debit card interchange fee regulation: Evidence from Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Tavares de Castro ,&nbsp;Emerson Erik Schmitz ,&nbsp;Monique de Abreu Azevedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.latcb.2022.100078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents an empirical analysis of the introduction, in October 2018, of maximum thresholds (“caps”) on debit card interchange fees for domestic payment cards in Brazil. We investigate the behavior of card issuers’ revenues from debit and credit card interchange fees, the merchant discount rate (MDR) of debit transactions, debit and credit card usage, and debit card scheme fees paid by card issuers and acquirers after the cap. We find a gradual and increasing reduction in the MDR, from 6.0% in 2018Q4 to 22.8% in 2020Q1. Additionally, we observe a statistically significant difference between debit and credit card MDR in 2019Q4 and 2020Q1. The cap reduces card issuers’ earnings from the debit card interchange fee proportionally to the cut but does not affect similar revenues from credit cards. Overall, there is no evidence that the regulation of the debit card interchange fee changes the dynamics of debit card usage or that it changes debit card scheme fees.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Journal of Central Banking\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Journal of Central Banking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666143822000321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666143822000321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对2018年10月巴西国内支付卡借记卡交换费最高限额(“上限”)的引入进行了实证分析。我们调查了发卡机构的借记卡和信用卡交换费收入、借记交易的商户折扣率(MDR)、借记卡和贷记卡使用情况,以及发卡机构和收单机构在上限后支付的借记卡计划费用的行为。我们发现MDR从2018年第四季度的6.0%逐渐下降到2020年第一季度的22.8%。此外,我们在2019Q4和2020Q1观察到借记卡和信用卡MDR之间存在统计学显著差异。该上限按比例减少了发卡机构从借记卡交换费中获得的收入,但不影响信用卡的类似收入。总体而言,没有证据表明对借记卡交换费的监管改变了借记卡使用的动态,也没有证据表明它改变了借记卡计划费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An empirical analysis of debit card interchange fee regulation: Evidence from Brazil

This paper presents an empirical analysis of the introduction, in October 2018, of maximum thresholds (“caps”) on debit card interchange fees for domestic payment cards in Brazil. We investigate the behavior of card issuers’ revenues from debit and credit card interchange fees, the merchant discount rate (MDR) of debit transactions, debit and credit card usage, and debit card scheme fees paid by card issuers and acquirers after the cap. We find a gradual and increasing reduction in the MDR, from 6.0% in 2018Q4 to 22.8% in 2020Q1. Additionally, we observe a statistically significant difference between debit and credit card MDR in 2019Q4 and 2020Q1. The cap reduces card issuers’ earnings from the debit card interchange fee proportionally to the cut but does not affect similar revenues from credit cards. Overall, there is no evidence that the regulation of the debit card interchange fee changes the dynamics of debit card usage or that it changes debit card scheme fees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The loan puzzle in Mexico Brazilian economy in the 2000’s: A tale of two recessions The effect of financial inclusion on economic and social indicators in Mexico Mitigating policies for pollutant emissions in a DSGE for the Brazilian economy Climate change and technology adoption with a large informal sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1