衡量支付系统中失败参与者的影响

Ronald Heijmans , Froukelien Wendt
{"title":"衡量支付系统中失败参与者的影响","authors":"Ronald Heijmans ,&nbsp;Froukelien Wendt","doi":"10.1016/j.latcb.2023.100106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Large banks and critical financial market infrastructures (FMIs) that are not able to fulfill their payment obligations, for example following a bankruptcy or cyber-attack, can be a source of financial instability and contagion in the financial system. This paper develops a composite risk indicator to evaluate the criticality of participants in a large value payment system network, combining liquidity risk (i.e. size of incoming and outgoing payments) and systemic impact or interconnections between network participants in one approach. It is applied, as a proof of concept, to the TARGET2 payment system that links banks and FMIs in a tight network of interdependencies. We find that the most critical participants in TARGET2 are other payment systems (large value and retail) because of the underlying gross size of their payment flows. Some banks may be critical, but this is mainly due to their interconnectedness with other TARGET2 participants. Central counterparties and central securities depositories are less critical to the payment system. Our findings can be used by (1) financial stability experts to evaluate the impact of a failing critical participant in the financial system, and (2) central banks in their role as payment system operator and overseer. Besides, it feeds into policy discussions on payment system access, oversight, and crisis management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100867,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the impact of a failing participant in payment systems\",\"authors\":\"Ronald Heijmans ,&nbsp;Froukelien Wendt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.latcb.2023.100106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Large banks and critical financial market infrastructures (FMIs) that are not able to fulfill their payment obligations, for example following a bankruptcy or cyber-attack, can be a source of financial instability and contagion in the financial system. This paper develops a composite risk indicator to evaluate the criticality of participants in a large value payment system network, combining liquidity risk (i.e. size of incoming and outgoing payments) and systemic impact or interconnections between network participants in one approach. It is applied, as a proof of concept, to the TARGET2 payment system that links banks and FMIs in a tight network of interdependencies. We find that the most critical participants in TARGET2 are other payment systems (large value and retail) because of the underlying gross size of their payment flows. Some banks may be critical, but this is mainly due to their interconnectedness with other TARGET2 participants. Central counterparties and central securities depositories are less critical to the payment system. Our findings can be used by (1) financial stability experts to evaluate the impact of a failing critical participant in the financial system, and (2) central banks in their role as payment system operator and overseer. Besides, it feeds into policy discussions on payment system access, oversight, and crisis management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Journal of Central Banking\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Journal of Central Banking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666143823000273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666143823000273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无法履行支付义务的大型银行和关键金融市场基础设施(FMI),例如在破产或网络攻击后,可能是金融系统中金融不稳定和传染的根源。本文开发了一个综合风险指标来评估大价值支付系统网络中参与者的关键性,将流动性风险(即传入和传出支付的规模)和系统影响或网络参与者之间的相互联系结合在一起。作为概念验证,它被应用于TARGET2支付系统,该系统将银行和FMI连接在一个紧密的相互依赖网络中。我们发现,TARGET2中最关键的参与者是其他支付系统(大额和零售),因为它们的支付流的潜在总规模。一些银行可能持批评态度,但这主要是由于它们与其他TARGET2参与者的相互联系。中央交易对手和中央证券托管机构对支付系统的重要性较低。我们的研究结果可供(1)金融稳定专家用来评估金融系统中一个失败的关键参与者的影响,以及(2)中央银行作为支付系统运营商和监督者的角色。此外,它还参与了有关支付系统访问、监督和危机管理的政策讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring the impact of a failing participant in payment systems

Large banks and critical financial market infrastructures (FMIs) that are not able to fulfill their payment obligations, for example following a bankruptcy or cyber-attack, can be a source of financial instability and contagion in the financial system. This paper develops a composite risk indicator to evaluate the criticality of participants in a large value payment system network, combining liquidity risk (i.e. size of incoming and outgoing payments) and systemic impact or interconnections between network participants in one approach. It is applied, as a proof of concept, to the TARGET2 payment system that links banks and FMIs in a tight network of interdependencies. We find that the most critical participants in TARGET2 are other payment systems (large value and retail) because of the underlying gross size of their payment flows. Some banks may be critical, but this is mainly due to their interconnectedness with other TARGET2 participants. Central counterparties and central securities depositories are less critical to the payment system. Our findings can be used by (1) financial stability experts to evaluate the impact of a failing critical participant in the financial system, and (2) central banks in their role as payment system operator and overseer. Besides, it feeds into policy discussions on payment system access, oversight, and crisis management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The loan puzzle in Mexico Brazilian economy in the 2000’s: A tale of two recessions The effect of financial inclusion on economic and social indicators in Mexico Mitigating policies for pollutant emissions in a DSGE for the Brazilian economy Climate change and technology adoption with a large informal sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1