与儿童和青少年接触:为卫生资源和干预措施的开发提供信息的研究中的参与性方法和方法的系统综述

IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Adolescent Research Review Pub Date : 2022-02-03 DOI:10.1007/s40894-022-00181-w
Kate Freire, Rod Pope, Kate Jeffrey, Kristen Andrews, Melissa Nott, Tricia Bowman
{"title":"与儿童和青少年接触:为卫生资源和干预措施的开发提供信息的研究中的参与性方法和方法的系统综述","authors":"Kate Freire,&nbsp;Rod Pope,&nbsp;Kate Jeffrey,&nbsp;Kristen Andrews,&nbsp;Melissa Nott,&nbsp;Tricia Bowman","doi":"10.1007/s40894-022-00181-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In research, participatory approaches involve engaging in the research <i>with</i> people and empower co-researchers to have a voice. The aim of this review was to synthesize the methods and approaches used to enable children, adolescents, and families to be involved in a participatory approach in research conducted to inform development of health resources and interventions aimed at children and adolescents. Key databases were searched systematically using key word and subject heading searches and included studies were appraised for both methodological quality and sufficiency of reporting of their participatory approach. Findings were synthesized using a critical narrative approach. Among 26 eligible studies, commonly reported participatory approaches involved community-based participatory research, codesign, participatory design, coproduction, and user-centred design. A need was identified to involve co-researchers more in the later stages of participatory approaches. Most studies were of low to moderate methodological quality. A wide variety of methods and activities were used in the studies to enable children to participate in the research, but few studies provided sufficient evidence of their participatory approach. This review concludes that reporting of participatory approaches might benefit from the guidelines that acknowledge the dual nature of participatory approaches as both a research method and an approach that enables action and change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45912,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Research Review","volume":"7 3","pages":"335 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40894-022-00181-w.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging with Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Participatory Methods and Approaches in Research Informing the Development of Health Resources and Interventions\",\"authors\":\"Kate Freire,&nbsp;Rod Pope,&nbsp;Kate Jeffrey,&nbsp;Kristen Andrews,&nbsp;Melissa Nott,&nbsp;Tricia Bowman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40894-022-00181-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In research, participatory approaches involve engaging in the research <i>with</i> people and empower co-researchers to have a voice. The aim of this review was to synthesize the methods and approaches used to enable children, adolescents, and families to be involved in a participatory approach in research conducted to inform development of health resources and interventions aimed at children and adolescents. Key databases were searched systematically using key word and subject heading searches and included studies were appraised for both methodological quality and sufficiency of reporting of their participatory approach. Findings were synthesized using a critical narrative approach. Among 26 eligible studies, commonly reported participatory approaches involved community-based participatory research, codesign, participatory design, coproduction, and user-centred design. A need was identified to involve co-researchers more in the later stages of participatory approaches. Most studies were of low to moderate methodological quality. A wide variety of methods and activities were used in the studies to enable children to participate in the research, but few studies provided sufficient evidence of their participatory approach. This review concludes that reporting of participatory approaches might benefit from the guidelines that acknowledge the dual nature of participatory approaches as both a research method and an approach that enables action and change.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adolescent Research Review\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"335 - 354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40894-022-00181-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adolescent Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-022-00181-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-022-00181-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在研究中,参与式方法涉及与人一起参与研究,并赋予联合研究人员发言权。本次审查的目的是综合用于使儿童、青少年和家庭能够参与研究的方法和方法,为开发针对儿童和青少年的卫生资源和干预措施提供信息。使用关键词和主题标题搜索系统地搜索了关键数据库,并对纳入的研究的方法论质量和参与方法报告的充分性进行了评估。研究结果采用批判性叙述方法进行综合。在26项符合条件的研究中,通常报告的参与式方法包括基于社区的参与式研究、代码设计、参与式设计、联合制作和以用户为中心的设计。已确定有必要让联合研究人员更多地参与参与性方法的后期阶段。大多数研究的方法学质量低至中等。研究中使用了各种各样的方法和活动,使儿童能够参与研究,但很少有研究提供充分的证据证明他们的参与方法。本次审查的结论是,参与性方法的报告可能受益于承认参与性方法作为一种研究方法和一种能够采取行动和变革的方法的双重性质的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Engaging with Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Participatory Methods and Approaches in Research Informing the Development of Health Resources and Interventions

In research, participatory approaches involve engaging in the research with people and empower co-researchers to have a voice. The aim of this review was to synthesize the methods and approaches used to enable children, adolescents, and families to be involved in a participatory approach in research conducted to inform development of health resources and interventions aimed at children and adolescents. Key databases were searched systematically using key word and subject heading searches and included studies were appraised for both methodological quality and sufficiency of reporting of their participatory approach. Findings were synthesized using a critical narrative approach. Among 26 eligible studies, commonly reported participatory approaches involved community-based participatory research, codesign, participatory design, coproduction, and user-centred design. A need was identified to involve co-researchers more in the later stages of participatory approaches. Most studies were of low to moderate methodological quality. A wide variety of methods and activities were used in the studies to enable children to participate in the research, but few studies provided sufficient evidence of their participatory approach. This review concludes that reporting of participatory approaches might benefit from the guidelines that acknowledge the dual nature of participatory approaches as both a research method and an approach that enables action and change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Adolescent Research Review
Adolescent Research Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Adolescent Research Review publishes articles that review important contributions to the understanding of adolescence.  The Review draws from the many subdisciplines of developmental science, psychological science, education, criminology, public health, medicine, social work, and other allied disciplines that address the subject of youth and adolescence. The editors are especially interested in articles that bridge gaps between disciplines or that focus on topics that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.  Reviews must be cutting edge and comprehensive in the way they advance science, practice or policy relating to adolescents.
期刊最新文献
Adolescent Social Media Use and Emotional Intelligence: A Systematic Review LGBTQ+  Youth Identity Disclosure Processes: A Systematic Review A Systematic Review of the Facilitators and Barriers to Help-Seeking for Self-Harm in Young People: A Systems Thinking Perspective Key Components and Content of Effective Evidence-Based Digital Prevention Programs for Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Umbrella Review The Role of Organized Activities in Supporting Youth Social Capital Development: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1