Padraic Rocliffe, Brendan O’Keeffe, Liam Walsh, Michalis Stylianou, James Woodforde, Luis García-González, Wesley O’Brien, Tara Coppinger, Ian Sherwin, Patricia Mannix-McNamara, Ciaran MacDonncha
{"title":"典型学校体育、体育活动和体育活动对青少年体育活动行为的影响:系统文献综述","authors":"Padraic Rocliffe, Brendan O’Keeffe, Liam Walsh, Michalis Stylianou, James Woodforde, Luis García-González, Wesley O’Brien, Tara Coppinger, Ian Sherwin, Patricia Mannix-McNamara, Ciaran MacDonncha","doi":"10.1007/s40894-022-00200-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Typical school provision of physical education, physical activity and sports, which reflects the response to national curriculum, resource base and ethos of schools, may impact adolescent physical activity behaviors. This impact has not been considered in systematic literature reviews to date. The Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, PsychINFO, ERIC and MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant literature (2000–2022) on adolescents aged 12–18 years in secondary schools. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including eight cross-sectional, three longitudinal and two cluster randomized control trials. Included studies contributed 84 reported effects. Physical activity behavior was the most frequently reported outcome (n = 52), 48% of which were non-significant, 29% significantly positive, 10% significantly negative and 13% demonstrated a positive or negative trend but with no test of significance. Evidence was also found to support an impact on meeting physical activity guidelines (62.5% significantly positive effects) and in reducing sedentary behavior, particularly in girls.Notwithstanding considerable heterogeneity in the data paralleled with methodological limitations, presented evidence supports the positive impact of typical school provision of physical education, physical activity and sports on adolescent physical activity behaviors.</p><p>A structured protocol for this systematic literature review was registered on the International Prospective register of Systematic Reviews (ID number CRD42021200767).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45912,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Research Review","volume":"8 3","pages":"359 - 385"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Typical School Provision of Physical Education, Physical Activity and Sports on Adolescent Physical Activity Behaviors: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Padraic Rocliffe, Brendan O’Keeffe, Liam Walsh, Michalis Stylianou, James Woodforde, Luis García-González, Wesley O’Brien, Tara Coppinger, Ian Sherwin, Patricia Mannix-McNamara, Ciaran MacDonncha\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40894-022-00200-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Typical school provision of physical education, physical activity and sports, which reflects the response to national curriculum, resource base and ethos of schools, may impact adolescent physical activity behaviors. This impact has not been considered in systematic literature reviews to date. The Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, PsychINFO, ERIC and MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant literature (2000–2022) on adolescents aged 12–18 years in secondary schools. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including eight cross-sectional, three longitudinal and two cluster randomized control trials. Included studies contributed 84 reported effects. Physical activity behavior was the most frequently reported outcome (n = 52), 48% of which were non-significant, 29% significantly positive, 10% significantly negative and 13% demonstrated a positive or negative trend but with no test of significance. Evidence was also found to support an impact on meeting physical activity guidelines (62.5% significantly positive effects) and in reducing sedentary behavior, particularly in girls.Notwithstanding considerable heterogeneity in the data paralleled with methodological limitations, presented evidence supports the positive impact of typical school provision of physical education, physical activity and sports on adolescent physical activity behaviors.</p><p>A structured protocol for this systematic literature review was registered on the International Prospective register of Systematic Reviews (ID number CRD42021200767).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adolescent Research Review\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"359 - 385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adolescent Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-022-00200-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-022-00200-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
典型的学校提供体育教育、体育活动和体育项目,反映了对国家课程、资源基础和学校风气的响应,可能会影响青少年的体育活动行为。到目前为止,系统的文献综述还没有考虑到这种影响。在Web of Science、SPORTDiscus、PsychINFO、ERIC和MEDLINE数据库中搜索了关于12-18岁中学青少年的相关文献(2000-2002)。13项研究符合纳入标准,包括8项横断面试验、3项纵向试验和2项分组随机对照试验。纳入的研究报告了84种影响。体育活动行为是最常报告的结果(n = 52),其中48%无显著性,29%显著阳性,10%显著阴性,13%表现出阳性或阴性趋势,但无显著性检验。研究还发现,有证据支持对满足体育活动指南(62.5%的显著积极影响)和减少久坐行为的影响,尤其是对女孩。尽管数据存在相当大的异质性,同时也存在方法上的局限性,但现有证据支持典型的学校体育教育、体育活动和体育对青少年体育活动行为的积极影响。该系统文献综述的结构化方案已在国际前瞻性系统综述登记册(ID号CRD42021200767)上登记。
The Impact of Typical School Provision of Physical Education, Physical Activity and Sports on Adolescent Physical Activity Behaviors: A Systematic Literature Review
Typical school provision of physical education, physical activity and sports, which reflects the response to national curriculum, resource base and ethos of schools, may impact adolescent physical activity behaviors. This impact has not been considered in systematic literature reviews to date. The Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, PsychINFO, ERIC and MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant literature (2000–2022) on adolescents aged 12–18 years in secondary schools. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including eight cross-sectional, three longitudinal and two cluster randomized control trials. Included studies contributed 84 reported effects. Physical activity behavior was the most frequently reported outcome (n = 52), 48% of which were non-significant, 29% significantly positive, 10% significantly negative and 13% demonstrated a positive or negative trend but with no test of significance. Evidence was also found to support an impact on meeting physical activity guidelines (62.5% significantly positive effects) and in reducing sedentary behavior, particularly in girls.Notwithstanding considerable heterogeneity in the data paralleled with methodological limitations, presented evidence supports the positive impact of typical school provision of physical education, physical activity and sports on adolescent physical activity behaviors.
A structured protocol for this systematic literature review was registered on the International Prospective register of Systematic Reviews (ID number CRD42021200767).
期刊介绍:
Adolescent Research Review publishes articles that review important contributions to the understanding of adolescence. The Review draws from the many subdisciplines of developmental science, psychological science, education, criminology, public health, medicine, social work, and other allied disciplines that address the subject of youth and adolescence. The editors are especially interested in articles that bridge gaps between disciplines or that focus on topics that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries. Reviews must be cutting edge and comprehensive in the way they advance science, practice or policy relating to adolescents.